Press "Enter" to skip to content

The Retirement Gap | Kevin Bracker | TEDxPittsburgStateUniversity


so recently there is a little study put

together by the World Economic Forum and

they found some good news and some bad

news the good news is life expectancies

are increasing and we’re all living a

little bit longer

it’s what’s bad news life expectancies

are increasing and we’re all living a

little bit longer so why is that bad

news it has to do with what we call the

retirement gap and the retirement gap is

the difference between how much we need

for retirement and how much we have

available for retirement and in 2015 the

World Economic Forum estimated that the

retirement gap in the US was about

twenty eight trillion dollars based on

the population at that time that works

out to a little under $90,000 for every

man woman and child in the United States

now not only is that number large but

its global and it’s growing so that by

2050 the World Economic Forum estimates

that the global retirement gap will hit

400 trillion dollars the US alone will

account for 137 trillion dollars of that

amount based on population forecasts for

2050 that works out to a little over

three hundred thousand dollars per

person in the United States so why do we

have a retirement gap the answer is

twofold one we’re not saving enough into

our retirement safety net Social

Security is facing challenges so if we

look at the personal savings rate in the

fourth quarter of 2017

it was a mere 2.4 percent that’s a third

lowest on record since the 1950s

according to the Federal Reserve and

because of that we have people getting

close to retirement without enough money

saved in their retirement accounts so in

2013 the average family with the head of

household in the 55 to 64 age group

bracket had just over $100,000 saved for

retirement that’s not nearly enough to

last through a potentially 25 plus year

retirement

unfortunately this chart actually

overstates how well-prepared we are

because this is looking at families with

retirement accounts and about 40% of the

population in the u.s. does not have

retirement accounts when we factor that

in the average family with the head of

household in that 55 to 64 age group

bracket those closest to retirement they

have less than one year’s income

available for retirement not only that

but our retirement safety net Social

Security is facing challenges

specifically the retirement trust fund

is expected to be depleted by 2035 at

that point Social Security is going to

be bringing in enough income to pay

about 77 percent of the promised

benefits so what can we do about this

one thing is to start saving earlier if

we take two hypothetical individuals

let’s call Tom and Jerry Tom gonna start

saving at age 23 he wants to retire at

62 so he’s got 39 years to go and tell

retirement he’s gonna save two hundred

dollars per month he anticipates he’ll

earn about an 8% rate of return Jerry on

the other hand he’s got some other

things going on he’s got some debts to

pay down first he’s probably not gonna

get started until he’s closer to 35 at

that point he’ll have 27 years until

retirement he’s not too worried he says

hey Tom’s only got 50 percent more time

than I do so if I save 50% more I’ll

catch up right wrong

Jerry needs to save five hundred and

sixty three dollars a month almost three

times as much to catch up with Tom at

retirement at age 62

so if starting to save early is so

powerful why don’t more of us do it the

answer is because it’s difficult to save

when our incomes are low and expenses

are high in young people today typically

do not have high incomes they also face

higher expenses a lot of college

graduates graduate significant amount of

student loans younger people tend to be

earning families buying houses all those

expenses start to add up also saving

early can look like a fool’s game early

on and what I mean by that is

compounding interest has kind of a

snowball effect it starts out very slow

and really builds power over time so if

we look at Tom over his first ten years

he’s saving $200 a month after that ten

years he’ll have contributed twenty four

thousand dollars to his retirement fund

and he’s going to earn about twelve

thousand six hundred dollars in

investment income over that time compare

that to his last four months in his last

four months have put away another $800

but earn about fifteen thousand dollars

in retirement income so if you look up

this chart back here you can see that

first ten years the yellow bar is how

much tom is contributing the blue bar is

how much he has after that ten years the

entir yellow bar is still contribution

blue bar is how much we have and that

red bar is all the investment income so

early on it can get very frustrating to

save for retirement cuz it doesn’t look

like anything’s happening if you stick

to it makes a difference over time

another challenge we face is that

markets are smarter than we are

if you look at professional mutual fund

managers these people are intelligent

they’re well-educated they have lots of

resources at their disposal and their

job is to find attractive investment

opportunities if anybody can outperform

the market it should be these guides so

how well do they do the answer is not

very well

professional mutual fund managers over

three to five year windows tend to

underperform the market about 80 percent

of the time so if these professional

mutual fund managers can’t outperform

the market what does that mean for the

rest of us

the answer is it’s even worse if you

compare the performance of individuals

investing in mutual funds to the mutual

funds they’re investing in

expect those numbers to be pretty close

they’re not mutual funds earned a

staggering 3.5 percent a year higher

returns than the individuals investing

in those funds how does that happen why

does that make sense

the answer has to do with market timing

investors tend to want to buy stocks and

they’re confident in those companies

they’re confident in the economy and

unfortunately at that time stock prices

tend to be high on stock prices go up

stock prices go down if you’ve been

watching the financial markets over the

last couple weeks you’ve definitely seen

that sometimes when they go down people

tend to invest more by the dip and that

can be a good strategy however sometimes

markets go down and then they go down

and then they go down and finally at

some point people hit their maximum

amount of emotional and financial pain

they say I don’t trust the markets

anymore get me out I can’t handle this

and they sell their stocks

unfortunately that usually is about the

time that markets are bottoming out now

a lot of times people will come back to

the stock market but they don’t do that

until they’re comfortable again and

they’re not comfortable until stock

prices have risen 30 40 50 percent or

more so instead of buying low and

selling high what we tend to do is just

the opposite buy high and sell low now

I’ve just talked about mutual funds and

mutual funds really are a great

investment tool they provide efficient

diversification they save you from

spending your weekends reading annual

reports and analyzing financial

statements and all that other fun stuff

unfortunately mutual funds are not free

and the expenses associated with mutual

funds our primary reason why

professional mutual fund managers

underperform the market the two major

expenses faced by investors in mutual

funds are an expense ratio and a low

charge an expense ratio is a small

percentage of assets taken out on an

annual basis designed to cover the funds

expenses and allow the fun to earn a

profit these expenses can range from as

low as about 0.15 percent a year

to over one percent a year typically at

the low end we’re looking at passively

managed index funds at the high end

we’re looking at smaller actively

managed funds the other primary expense

with mutual funds is called a low charge

that’s a sales commission charged

upfront every time you put new money

into the mutual fund those can range

from as low as 0% what we call a no load

fund all the way up to a little over 8%

now these expenses are not that dramatic

on a year-to-year basis however over a

thirty to forty year window of saving

for retirement they can end up costing

investors anywhere from $40,000 to over

three hundred and fifty thousand dollars

of their retirement assets how do you

stay at that smaller end focus on those

passively managed index funds remember

the professional mutual fund managers

typically don’t out form the market so

there’s no reason to pay for performance

that you’re not going to get now another

leakage to our investment returns is

taxes every dollar that we pay in taxes

is the dollar less that we have in our

pocket at retirement fortunately there

are several tax advantage savings plans

out there designed for retirement one of

the most popular is a 401k plan 401k

plans are offered through your employer

and they usually provide some sort of

match maybe fifty percent are a hundred

percent the most common match right now

is a one to one basis for every dollar

you contribute your employer is gonna

match that with one percent I mean

another dollar

now on these 401k plans usually there’s

limits to how much of that match you can

get maybe it’s five percent six percent

of your income not every employer offers

a 401k plan however individuals can also

take advantage of tax sheltered accounts

called individual retirement accounts

they provide a lot of the same tax

benefits but you don’t get that employer

match now there are two basic structures

for individual retirement account some

401k plans

the first is what we call a traditional

IRA our traditional 401k plan they have

a front loaded tax benefit which means

you get a tax break when you make a

contribution and your money is going to

compound tax-free while it’s in that

fund so you’re not paying taxes on

interest income dividend income capital

gains and that’s gonna allow your money

to grow faster unfortunately once you

retire and start taking money out of a

traditional IRA our traditional 401k the

IRS is going to consider that at income

and they’re gonna tax that the

alternative is a Roth IRA Roth IRAs and

Roth 401k plans have a back loaded tax

benefit so you no longer get a tax break

on your initial contribution however the

money is still going to compound

tax-free so you’re not losing money to

taxes while it’s in that fund and then

when you go to take money out in

retirement every dollar you take out is

yours to keep the IRS does not tax

withdraws from a Roth IRA Roth 401k plan

now there are limits to how much you can

contribute to these tax sheltered plans

that’s $5,500 for an IRA 18,500 for a

401k plan per year how powerful are

these tax sheltered plans

the answer is amazingly powerful your

benefit is going to vary based on how

much you save how long you’re saving

what rate of return you earn what tax

bracket you’re in there’s lots of moving

parts however in one hypothetical

example of an individual with a 25 year

retirement window they were able to

generate an extra twelve hundred to over

twenty-five hundred dollars a month in

retirement income the biggest benefit

coming from the 401k plan due to that

employer contribution now while these

plans are very powerful unfortunately

not everybody has the opportunity to

participate according to the Bureau of

Labor Statistics only about sixty

percent of people are covered by 401k

plans by their employer and only about

forty percent of people participate in

now I’ve been talking about individual

strategies there are also a couple of

systemic fixes we can make to try to

reduce that retirement gap one of those

is education the key measure of how well

people make financial decisions is

something called financial literacy and

there is a relatively short six question

multiple choice true/false quiz that has

been given across the United States for

a number of years to try to measure

financial literacy and the results are

not encouraging the national average is

a little over three out of those six

questions three point one three on

average correct now I’m giving this talk

in the state of Kansas Kansans you can

take a little bit of pride in your

performance you outperform the national

average we still only get three point

three three out of those six questions

right so if we can do a better job of

creating financial education that can

help people make better decisions and

reduce that retirement gap another thing

that we can do to improve the situation

are called behavioral nudges there’s a

field of finance that looks at how

people make psychological mistakes over

and over again and because we are aware

of these psychological mistakes we can

design the system to reduce those and

those are called nudges one of the

problems with 401k plans is most of the

time they’re set up as an opt-in plan

which means when you get hired in

addition to meeting all your co-workers

meeting your boss learning about all the

benefits package oh by the way take some

time and fill out this 401k plan okay

there’s so much going on a lot of people

are like I’ll get to that in a couple

months couple months becomes a couple

years and before long they’ve forgotten

about the 401k plan so a 2001 study said

what if we flip that around instead of

having people opt in let’s have them opt

out we’re gonna automatically enroll

people when they get hired I’m not gonna

force anybody to participate if they

want to get out they can do that so you

can opt out we’re just going to set the

default setting to have you

automatically and

all that make a difference the answer is

yes it increased participation rates

from a little over thirty five percent

to about eighty five percent more than

doubling the number of people

participating in 401k plans

another problem with 401k plans is

people don’t save enough saving rates

are low reason a lot of people start

401k plans when they’re younger we

talked about the problems of saving

while you’re younger and they say you

know what I’ll just put a little bit in

now and then I’ll increase that over

time unfortunately that doesn’t happen

usually we leave it where it is over a

long period of time so a 2004 study said

what if we get people to sign an

agreement that we’re gonna automatically

raise they’re saving rate over a fixed

number of years will that make a

difference the answer again is yes

dramatically it increased savings rates

from about three and a half percent to

almost fourteen percent over a matter of

a few years

so these nudges can not only double

participation rates they can triple part

our savings rates if we can institute

these individual strategies and these

systemic fixes we can have people making

better financial decisions reduce the

retirement gap and how more people end

up with a happy retirement thank you [Applause]

Please follow and like us: