Press "Enter" to skip to content

Le vrai du faux | Camille Srour | TEDxIESEGLille


you are all liars
you as I myself also
does not exclude the lot all we
liars in a completed experiment
1996 was even a psychologist
Set the frequency with which we
climbed it had asked its
Students keep a kind of diary
intimate and 10 listed daily
the number of lies he uttered
the results take us we take
would all mean two lies
per day per person
we are all liars so well
Sure there a lie and lie
there is a fundamental difference between
tell his wife that he is true to
taken a few kilos since season
beaches mixing honey you to make sure
you have not taken a gram and another
side lie shamelessly on his CV
claiming to have a diploma
we would have never gotten reality
it is precisely elsewhere in
these situations with high stakes they
whether professional or personal
yet it is the financial
important to know the detect
lie but there is a problem the
Lying and its detection for
majority of them is a box
black
we understand that it happens things
this has an influence that this has a
impact but it is unclear how in
How and by what processes
I actually all offers
just tonight is to take a
look at this black box to open
all this black box and go
see what’s going on inside
but not immediately
before claiming detect
effectively falsehood must first
I understand how you all a
we do it all in life
everyday to fool others
there are 14 fashion manseau and ten of
them his loud speech and will the
discover together tonight
the first mode lies
you all know this is the omission
the omission is when for all
honest should include
information but we forget
advantageously ed you
very late dinner friends you
call and you tell them I
really sorry I had many
a lot of work that’s why I
I’m late coming in all this
very true you fail
just said that when you
even found time to go through
home before you started
this is an example commission comes
then the answer is elective
maybe a little less known the
elective answer is little
you are asked in several issues
a single sentence and you
choose to answer only one
of them that where of course you
can answer the truth is still
released in nightclub last night is
that you were in you were to smile
mague go to you and you answer
listen I’m a bit fed up with all
these charges every time I
go outside
no I was not actually in mag
you were sowing the
falsification Now I linger
not too over by a lie
Excellence is when just
you a story of all
rooms double causality is more
This precisely double
emotional causality this time
it is when you feel
emotion
you admit feeling this emotion
but you lie about the cause of this
feeling
you join a friend for a drink
glass
she seems worried worried
you wonder what’s wrong
and she tells you this is the job I
worries at work in reality it
just passed medical examinations and
it has not sufficiently digest
information to talk openly
with you while on a register more
Now light the fake syrup said that
it’s a way of lies that I love
lot because they require a bit
more daring irony the pit is
When you exaggerate the Pellemans
or about the tone so the other
says that you are necessarily
joking gentlemen from
beginning of your relationship with your
campaign you’ve ever had
suspicions about his loyalty and tonight
you decide once and for the
confront you wrong it is that you
a lover you see someone else go
You can say to you and then your
companion looks you straight in the
eyes without blinking and it tells you
yes yes darling you all
including
yes I have a lover and even as I
see every week when thou
then displacement responses as
beware that you euphemistic
now the euphemism is a bit
one pours irony in the pit
pit irony is exaggerated in the About
understatement
is tenuous the new employee has
make its arrival in your team
job
after a few weeks
you formed an opinion about it
you find pedantic autun short you
hate and yet each
Once one asks you to his
subject and they ask you how you
hear him answering
invariably I get along with him
without that’s the fact that the soul
sion is interpreted now here
there are on the wrong
interpretation of his remarks by
the other to deceive
you may be like me that old
friend who has long sought his way
in life but there it is today
he found it is defined as
painter and besides you
invites his first exhibition
you arrive you look
three paintings there is nothing to do
you have never seen anything so ugly
and your friend just happens to
moment and look a bit anxious you
then calls out in what is said to you
and to avoid offending the desired
Alain said I have no words
I really not expecting that and
the restarts delighted with what he took as
a compliment played the game about words
widely used by politicians
and also the case in history
Perhaps the best known is that of
the case in 1998 to Monica Levinsky
burst in the United States and the Bill
Clinton concluded one of its
television appearances by the words
following
I have not had sex with
this woman Monica Levinsky and later
when the material evidence were
accumulated against him and that he had
testify before a grand jury
it is forbidden as follows
for him there was no relationship
sex with Monica Lewinsky as
it was she who had committed an act
So for him it had not been
sex with her in his
definition
then this is a good example but not
frankly more compelling game
Leskiw the words now is
just when you
question and answering side
the plate you’re the jargon
it also trata gene is very
used by politicians
and finally much indignation is also
a kind of skins but this time
an emotional dimension is added
a moral dimension month – you dare
accuse me of that which hath no shame
indignity
So there lies modes
verbal one comes to see but
once you have seen it all
still remains the question to a
million dollars is what can the
detect
is what we can detect these votes
Live lies there is a way
reliable to do and elsewhere
that our intuitions are worth our first
impressions
Is what can be relied upon or is this
it would change the method and
all TV series like
Lie to me mentalist terms of
truth in it because it works
in real life
or is it the contrary, it is the
Piper then I prefer announced
immediately detect deception is
an extremely complicated task
in real life it is as if
we decide the veracity of
person playing coin
because studies are formal one
detected and indistinguishable better
lies and truths in 54% of
cases and 54%
from a statistical point of view this is
no different from the random level
level of luck so then me
request for agreement but it is
still not a reliable sign that
someone is lying and you know all the
background
Unfortunately, there is no in pool
that light up very above the
head of a person every time
she’s lying there is not
equivalent to pinocchio nose
lengthen and inevitably each
new mans actually voted
when we want to seriously evaluate the
credibility of a statement
must be observed all behaviors
his interlocutor behavior
verbal and nonverbal verbal parra
but tonight I would like to already
already you to leave with
verbal techniques that will enable you
far better detect deception
This technique is actually two
principles that my colleagues have
affectionately called the two
Relief principles I repeat
again and again and the first principle
it’s the next person does lie
it may seem simple but person
wants can lie preferred
exaggerated the facts and stretch
truth rather than from a
big fat lie by falsifying
The second principle is that each
think exactly what it says is no longer
2 and I mean not just the
same direction and that bet because it will make
it is really a bet that people
mean what they say they say
the truth
but we will not make any deduction
their response it may seem
perhaps rather simplistic but it is
one can even analyze what is
considered the biggest lie
the French state with both
principles and I mean plays
illegal
controlled during Mitterrand
seven years of his five years earlier
we will look at the extract and apply
all these principles mobilize
listen maria the entity group
eco system here and I
personally I read one
Room is also very surprised that you
open discussion of these things
follow thought we were when she
fell shallows Monday on the pack
septaine interruption make it there
Service is no quota the elysée
there can not be any
I know not how it’s done elsewhere
Listens but it was the
costs which would have been requested by the
countering the cell well elysée
not sure the concerts we fall asleep a little
more but I do not intend confesses
nothing allows it to meet
your questions
What can we see in this
extract is there any elements
clues that could leave
think that there is more in the realm
what the French President
wanted to admit me, well I
am interested in two sentences
are actually the only ones where the
President responds directly to
accusations that are made of him
the first elysée not listen to anything he
No listening system here
I personally have never read
one of them costs nothing to elysée
this stage there is an ambiguity about
model is what it means to
meaning restricts the residence of the head of
state or in a broader sense
the executive as a whole
François Mitterrand is not want
not lie
he applies our first principle is
spontaneously includes the answer in the
next sentence he says there is no
listened to here ie system
the elysée refers to
residence of the head of the state he adds
then this is even more interesting
and I personally have never
read only the words I
personally serve a priori
nothing in this sentence if one reads the
sentence by removing it and give
I have never read a single
yet according to our second principle
everyone thinks exactly what it says
François Mitterrand is the included
they make sense to him that is
we will believe
we will do what it actually bet that
personally never read a
but only so far we do not go in
deduce that he never ordered the
we will not infer either that we
has ever reported gasoline
possible plays
and then finally when he says I do
have ever read one the art of reading
also is interesting since it assumes
it presupposes that we know under what
format are reported Listens me
it is not obvious I do not know
that necessarily plays are not
reported on their audio formats but
a form of registration
we continue there is no service
listening to elysée can not there
to have
I do not know indeed how
made plays, I do not know
also how to listen to my one fact
choice so awesome we are in
Leskiw quintessential François
mitterrand remember do not want
lie and so he produced this response
me and besides I think any
now I doubt that Francois
Mitterrand himself technically wise
making plays but so far it
can not conclude that we
would not then ordered tonight was
could give the impression that opposes and
sincere people liars
but there are no people still
dishonest
on one side and the other people
always honest there is not a
side bluffers and smoothies
and talkers and scam
and the other inserts the
irreproachable good Samaritans
all we share this duality
we all turn a bit
flattering a little liar or really
sincere finally all we want
but obviously not true person
would be ready to deliver the back of his
constantly thinking and it is
normal
what interests me basically it is
to better detect lies
in the most critical situations
appeal for witnesses to a kidnapping
Security police interrogation
when notice even people can
be in play then yes detect
Lying is a very difficult task
difficult even seen but
ie should be safe
signed give up and accept
finally he must first give
his trust in someone and then
we’ll see if later it must
remove or otherwise become a little
cynical a little paranoid and began
almost on principle to doubt all
each in all circumstances that
I propose that this is not only
more trust anyone but
rather a scientific approach
regain confidence in his own
judgment
[Applause]
Please follow and like us: