Press "Enter" to skip to content

Experimentation for Progress | Toshi Nakamura | TEDxYerevanSalon


hi so imagine that you are a head of a

development organization and many of you

actually are indeed and so you are

listening to a pitch from three

different teams and the idea that they

are pitching for is an effective support

package for the poor to be able to

increase their income and the first team

says that you should invest in cows

because cows generates very high return

on investment but second team says that

no no no actually issue give cash

because with cash the poor can make

their own decisions on what to invest

and the third group says well actually

you should invest in chickens because

you can reach even more people with the

same amount of money that you’re

providing for cows for example so how do

you decide this I think is a very

important question for all of us because

we want to make a maximum impact in a

very very effective manner so a sensible

answer might be to say that well let’s

compare these options and see which one

would generate the highest return on

investment and based on that you will

make a decision

it sounds no-brainer right but are we as

testing and comparing different options

with evidence oh let’s call

experimentation doesn’t seem to happen

all that often in the development sector

but if you think about it

experimentation is everywhere we humans

want to understand how the world works

and we want to understand how we can get

the result that we want and take an

example

this is my sixth year old daughter and

she often conducts an experiment so she

will come to me and ask a questions like

this can I watch something on my on my

iPad and if I say no she would go to her

mother and asked the exact same question

to see if she would get the most

satisfactory answer

so through this experiment she’s

figuring out how she can get what she

wants an experimentation seems to be

also a commonplace in the business

sector so suppose that you are renewing

your company’s website in a big way and

before you make a huge investment you

might want to compare right so this

design a generated this percentage of

the click rate and the other design

created generated even higher click

rates so based on this test you might

want to make a decision on which one you

want to invest in so this

experimentation is a commonplace in

business and in our everyday life

but it does not seems to be the norm in

the development sector and this is

despite the fact that there’s so much at

stake in the development sector because

it touches the lives and well-being of

so many people in living in a very

difficult conditions and I must admit

that I myself was not thinking about

experiment until recently so the large

development programs are often designed

without really comparing different

options and without really looking at

the evidence and the reason for this

might be because of the way that

planning and funding process are set up

so funders often ask the recipient

organization to spell out all the

detailed activities for the next four

years and there is also a cumbersome

grant amendment process if you want to

change the project design which is quite

but the good news is that this is

starting to change there is more and

more interest in experimentation and

evidence-based decisions and pioneering

work is being done by institutions such

as MIT is j-pal or innovations for

poverty action so this is an example so

out of a 2,400 candidates to become a

community health workers 300 were

recruited through two different methods

and one recruiting message emphasize the

social incentive so basically if you

join this community health workers group

you will be able to serve the community

so it’s a social incentive and the other

group was recruited through more of a

carrier incentive so if you join this

community health workers group you

actually can develop your own skills and

after a year a study was conducted and

compared this the performance of these

two groups of community health workers

what they found was that those who were

recruited through the carrier incentive

messages performed a lot better

they organized 30% more a household

visit and they also organized twice as

many community meetings compared to its

counterpart now some of the

practitioners here may ask right this is

quite important but we are doers we are

not researchers so what do we do I think

the answer lies in a lean

experimentation so let me rewind a bit

seven years ago I left the United

Nations and then started my own

organization called Kopernik and

Kopernik is named after Nicholas

Copernicus who himself was very fond of

experimentation and just like he changed

the way that we see the world we wanted

to

the changed the way that development

assistance is delivered and one of the

things that we have been doing is to

distribute a very simple yet

life-changing technologies to the poor

in the last mile so technology such as

clean cookstoves or water filters or

solar lights and these are distributed

through a sales agent that we recruit

and train and after a while we notice

that there is a huge difference in terms

of the sales performance among the sales

agent and we wanted to find out what is

contributing to that because we wanted

to reach more people in a more effective

way so we took a sample of a

high-performing sales agent and compared

against the general overall sales agent

and we looked at the things like gender

or age or the previous background in

business and none of these were

differentiating between the high

performing sales agent and an ordinary

sales agent but when we looked at the

mobility we found an interesting

correlations so those agent who have

easy access to motorbike was selling

twice as limited as many technologies

compared to those without access to the

motorbike so through this very simple

experiment we changed our recruitment

strategies of the sales agent and this

took us only three days of our staff

time another experiment that another

example of a lean experimentation we

conduct is around grain storage

this is sorghum which is the fifth

common a most common grain in the world

and this is becoming quite popular in

eastern part of Indonesia

where many of our activities are

concentrated around and this becomes

very popular because it grows without

much water so it’s appropriate for the

dry area and it’s very very nutritious

but the challenge is that after the

harvest farmers typically stores these

grains in a very simple bag like this

this is just a wooden plastic bags and

soon this grain will be infested with

weevils and up to 70% of the grain is

eaten up so it is a huge waste of

resources and also a huge loss of

potential income for these smallholder

farmers so we wanted to do something

about it and we did some quick research

and found that maize has a very same

issue and some organizations are

advocating for an airtight or hermetic

storage method and we were not sure if

the same solution would work with

sorghum because it’s after all it’s a

different grain so we wanted to test if

this hermetic storage indeed in

decreases the number of weevils the idea

of the hermetic storage is that you you

basically limit the flow of oxygen so

eventually the weevil will run out of

oxygen so they will die and when they

die of course they will stop eating the

grain so we did this experiment so we

had this bag of sorghum in a traditional

bag and the other one is contain use the

hermetic bag inside the traditional box

so it’s double double is sealed and this

each contained 25 kilogram of solvent

grain and we put them side-by-side for

three months and literally we go back

every month and have three scoops out of

and then spread it and then literally

count the number of weevils by hand and

after three months as expected this

traditional bag was infested with

weevils there are close to 400 weevils

it took a long time to count and while

this hermetic bag had less than a third

of the weevils now this is not a perfect

solution but it is reducing the number

of weevils significantly and this

experimentation costs less than $2,000

for us so I’m sharing these very

seemingly mundane and simple examples

because I believe that even a complex

development programs can be broken down

into simple activities and then can be

tested through lean experimentation so

the message today is that we should be

doing more of experimentation be it

rigorous or lean and really trying to

find a smart solutions that really work

and if we do that collectively soon we

will be able to achieve the sustainable

development goals more effectively and

we will also be able to answer the

question of which one it is cows cash or

chickens that are most effective in

increasing the income of the poor thank

you [Applause]

Please follow and like us: