[Music]
[Applause]
[Music]
[Applause]
[Music]
and me my goal tonight is to
to convince you that there is not only
people who are nice but also the
farmers all farmers the
world
in fact ten thousand years of
enough world farmers
he develops new systems the
meadow that you see there next to the
farm is the pastures and since milan and
so generations between generations the
farmers perfect their system
in a century
on average it increases by 10% the
food production and that’s
very well
and then in the 20th century is a revolution
a revolution that started
exactly one hundred years ago what a hundred years ago
we developed the first hybrid corn
a plant capable of assimilating a lot
of synthetic nitrogen of chemical azov
but for which it is necessary to use
pesticides and false insecticides
mechanized and thanks to this news
plants
in 40 years, we have tripled
global grain production tripled
and so actually this production
world cereal
it was a very good news we
found in a situation where in fact
we could on the one hand ensure
well-being of farmers on the other hand
provide consumers with food
abundant and cheap and finally
give food to the 4 billion
people who have joined our planet
during the twentieth century so the
news was extraordinary
so extraordinary that today
a Canadian farmer alone can
feed 5000 people today in
a texas farm where there are seven thousand
cows produced 150 thousand liters of
milk that too it may not tell you
a hundred and fifty thousand liters
milk in fact that’s what you’re going
consume in this room during the
next four years in texas have
healthy product in a day so it’s a
extraordinary model
it is a revolution it was called
this revolution the green revolution is
what this revolution has concerned all
the farmers of the world
but no it concerned especially the
northern farmers
and asia farmers today
80% of the farmers in the world are
farmers who work on
small areas less than two hectares
who works by hand with one or
as you see here
these little farmers can not
feed thousands of people they
feed a dozen people on
therefore finds himself in a situation where
to the north we produce on average by
nobody
a thousand times more than what
produces a southern farmer
you imagine the inequality that has
installed between north and south
in addition to the technological miracle of the 20th
century has become an ecological disaster
today farmers complicity
for their productivity
at the end of the twentieth century they are accused
of all the evils he rules the crime
1 they destroy our health it spoils
our water they make disappear the
biodiversity decision trajectory
twentieth century had not taken into account
environmental impacts and
today there is one thing on which
everyone agrees that is that
this trajectory is not the right one
for agriculture we have to find
another way because this way he
is not sustainable in the 21st century
given the climatic problems seen the
limitation of resources
ok so what do we do we will
look for another model and fortunately
we found another model this other
model
it actually comes from the south and peasants from
south and bears a very beautiful name he
is called agroecology agroecology
does that mean what the name says
means doing farming and in
same time of ecology it means
unlike the model of the twentieth century
no longer master nature but be
the ally of nature work
together imitate the natural systems
like here in the case of
agroforestry try to profit at
maximum services that we can
provide nature and this is a model that
works it’s a model that has been
defined at the very beginning there is a
thirty years in california which is
arrival in europe there are 10
with other researchers we have been
fascinated by this model have come
add NGOs civil society
today every year 1000 people
are united under the banner of a
project called agroecology
inaction it’s a model that even
convinced of the ministers it must be done
including the French Minister
stéphane farming the foll that has it
does a project for France so it’s
really a promising trajectory
for agriculture and yet I’m going
not tell you about this model am not
tell you about this model because ten
years after actually the consumption of
pesticides in France increased by 13%
ten years after very few farmers or
adopt the model of agroecology
so how is it possible that we have a
model that works and that no one
adopt it
in fact it’s because farmers
today are no longer able to
operate their systems
they no longer have decision-making power
is not they who decide prices this
is not they who decide what they
produce and so they are completely
dependent on a system that is dominated
on the one hand by agrochemicals
and on the other hand by the firms of
agrifood and for better you
make it clear I’m going to take two
examples it may be faster
and more fun for you first
example that concerns wheat all the
world knows the wheat and when you
think of the wheat automatically you
think of the pines wheat-flour-bread sin
trilogy that goes back to childhood did
part of our culture and our
knowledge today in Wallonia at
produced one million seven hundred thousand
tons of wheat 1 million 700 thousand tons
wheat what are we doing with this wheat
have made bread and well not actually
today in Wallonia we make bread
only with 9% of wheat with 9% of our
cereals makes bread 9% while so
we wanted to be self-sufficient
should use 28 % of our grain
to make bread then what do we do
with others 91 1% with others 91
1% actually made food for
animals mostly biofuels
especially here close to biot years and this
which remains of the remaining 13%
ex thus bears the choice that the system has
done with respect to cereals this is
not to devote them to manufacturing
of a food but it is the dispatcher
between its different uses
with the consequence that today a
Walloon farmer could feed
thousand people but in reality he does not
feeds that 200 it’s not his will
it’s the will of the system because in
more on this side a little aberrant of
the use of cereals
the farmer himself when he brings his
tipper it is unable to
know where she will finish if he goes
finish in a bread or in a bio
fuel
I promised you two examples on
second example I’m going to take
it is the milk issue that makes it the
milk to be a breeder and dairy producer
it’s really a very hard job to be
dairy farmer and producer
it’s really a very hard job each
day of the year you must truce to
cows morning evening every day even the
Christmas but November 11
you owe it to the cows and when the
end of the year dairy farmers
do their accounts
on average they did not gain anything from
everything and the years when prices are
bad on the world market because
it’s the global market that determines
the prices they may even have lost from
money and so they worked all
a year every day of the year and
they did not win anything at the end of this
year so how is it possible that he
continues but in fact they continue
thanks to you thanks to you because you
are the magicians who allow them to
continue to make milk you are
magicians because you give each
of you every European gives 100
euros per year for agricultural policy
common and its 100 euros per year they are
there to encourage agriculture and so
in fact the dairy farmers they
earn their living only in Wallonia
on basis and subsidies 100 % of their
income is a subsidy
if we extrapolate on a European scale
41 % of the income of all
farmers in europe it’s subsidy
we see the system in which we are
so well it was known zhi thanks to this
agricultural policy to more products
in addition to milk it’s great
product even so much
when you know more what to do with it and so
we have to export it we export to
Africa and now we start to
export it to China then alone and
I found them the European one
export I found them at callas at
burkina faso where I was this week and
welcoming European milk arrive
good he made quite a way first
we have a dryer to turn it
in beam then he made 5000 km in
boat to get to dakar then to
dakar 2300 kilometers to get to
kaya by the truck and when he gets to
create one is it useful and sold 45
cents per liter 45 cents per liter
this is the price at which samba diop that
you see here we’ll put the picture that
that he is smiling but he a little the
balls because he 45 saint of the liter
that’s the price at which he buys the milk
to local producers
he still has to transform it the
distribute them distribute in a
little plastic pocket like that and
give a little bit more money to
wholesalers his milk he sells it
70% in the market at 75 on the market
you imagine that today because we
on milk product in europe on
impoverishes and prevents the development
dairies in the south
we are in a paradoxical situation where
unlike what you are doing
sometimes believe to produce more does not allow
not feeding the planet
today has plenty to feed
all of the people who live
on earth
but the big problem is that
part of the peasants the planet are among
the poorest and suffer from hunger
and his peasants they are killed by a
system that actually export their
surplus to their country and prevents the
development of their sector so if
you want to remember one thing it’s more
we produce in the north the more we impoverish the
South
that’s it the real equation is so and
that’s not the farmers’ will
from the north who are dependent on subsidies
it is surely not the will
southern farmers in party
farmers from the north and south they
are in competition
they are opposed to each other without
that he never wanted
they are a bit like players from
clickair you say to cork I believe some
eqiiaire players who are in the process of
to be fixed on bars etc have done
play against each other by letting
to fall any solidarity between
agriculture they are put in
competition and so we’re in a
pretty hopeless situation
I had been told before you came
to do a smart tennis
saleh in inspiring mom i’m not
sure I ‘ve inspired you so far
I have the impression that you are
desperate and so he will stay me five
minutes actually conceals to try
to convince you that we have a role to
play around that and that we can
get to develop another vision of
the farmer one of our vision of
agriculture
another model I’m not going much
you talk about solutions because we
the technical solutions they exist
the trajectories
agroforestry I’ve already talked about
others the short circuits
organic farming are really
promising trajectories but you
understand it the problem is not
so much to have solutions
the problem is that these solutions are
set up in society
so the first thing to say is that
oil-based agriculture
we have good news agriculture
which I told you about at the beginning
based on oil and p6
of insecticides she took for 50
anyway she will disappear
because we do not have the resources to
maintain this type of agriculture
the whole question today is to
know how we are going to make the transition
between this model that has no none
future and a new model that’s it
question today
so in fact we are a little lost knows
not how to do when you are lost
there are two possible strategies
the first is to start walking
are you saying I’m going to find my
way one moment or another it’s a
little strategy to observe one who
today develops new
models without really knowing about that
the horizon he is heading
on my side I chose to
specialize in the discussion of this
horizon in scenarios for the future
with my team we have established
scenarios that shows that in Wallonia
we could in 2050 feed on base
of a model where there is 40% agriculture
biological and the rest is in
respectful agriculture
the environment
what we actually do is we
establishes card species
which allows to see where we should go there
there was a map that was available it was
that of the green revolution
but this card she is now
surpassed she us in the world brought us
at the top of the mountains
but today we know that she
leads to a precipice so you have to
open new paths and its
new trajectories
we can build them around three
great principles and for each of these
principles
you have a role to play first
principle is changing the goal
always produce more have a
food always cheaper it’s
impossible it is a path that
nowhere
what to do is to produce better
and pay the right price
we know then some models get
developed
I talked about short circuits
local organic farming
so we have models that work
but it remains on a very small scale and
often they are perceived as
models to privilege and that’s
maybe a little bit true then the other
solution is to challenge yourself to
change goals not a title
individual but as a society
in fact we are in a society where
we are watered with advertising or our
consumer choice in particular
are totally conditioned
I told you earlier that
farmers did not know what we
was making their wheat but you know you
where does it come from the wheat that was in your
bread this morning do you know how it is
possible that we offer you to you
pizzas at 3 euros
it seems logical to you that we can
make a pizza for 3 euros
we do not know and so the first step
if we want to change the objectives it is
to ask the systems over
transparency to question
individually collectively on the
how the system works
today and departing from saint de
set new goals for the system
this is the first step
the second principle that I propose to you
it’s about changing the target
today the ages are going to employ a
rather Brussels word farmers
they are a bit like a gaulle peak calf
they are the target
all the attacks the farmers on
accuses them of poisoning us for being
disregard of animal welfare
they are asked to stop using
pesticides as if farmers
were autonomous
in fact if today we use
pesticides including potato
it’s because we decided to export 85
% Belgian potatoes it’s not a
choice of farmers that’s a choice
of a society and so the second thing
to do is change the target
I think there is no hope if the
agriculture society then oppose
there are farmers who really are
pioneers who have developed
new systems
with that we enjoy talking but the
others often despises them often
the cartoons I think the second
step is to reconcile the majority
farmers with society
why the majority farmers because
that the majority of farmers in
daily he works with nature and
so they want to have
more agro-ecological systems and if they
do not do it it’s not bad
will or by incompetence but that’s
because they are in a points system
separate the over- indebtedness stuck by
the models that are imposed on them and so if
we members of civil society we
we did not reconcile with
farmers
we will never be able to get out of
the impasse in which we put the
green revolution
the third and last principle is
a principle it is a principle that
it was going to surprise you
I saw three years ago a film this movie
you may have seen it too
it’s called tomorrow when out of
movie I was angry I was angry
because in this film we were told
during 20 minutes of agriculture during
20 minutes we’ve seen initiatives from
small local initiatives and we have not seen
no farmer or farmer none
farmer neither north nor south
how can we talk about agriculture if
we do not talk about farmers so me
I have nothing against small
solutions
small initiatives they are very
nice she explores
new trajectories
but to make believe that stars of
reconverted cinema you feed us
it’s a little naive what we
feed and feed tomorrow those
farmers of today and tomorrow
and so I propose you this is
maybe to participate in small steps
it’s nice but at the same time to try
to see wide to see big to try
set to change system
which we and the farmers
are stuck
it will seem impossible to you
will say but our words are not coming
not small scale
how do you want us to go
arrives at large scale well I you
give an example that really gave me
of hope at the beginning of this year
morocco citizens and we do not know
the origin of the movement and locating decided
to boycott the largest group
global dairy and two weeks after
a few weeks after they have
started this boycott
the boss of this big group who wins
several million euros a year
elsewhere came to morocco and to negotiate
with the Moroccans by promising them
more local agriculture and a
agriculture more respectful of prices
give to producers
so I think it’s possible I
think there’s way to see the ark and
so if we have more agriculture
transparent more systems
transparent a reconciliation a
new announcement the farmers and
that we take the problem to great
ladder
I think there is a future for
agriculture anyway it’s a
need
a billion people today on
the planet live from agriculture
and it is with them and not against them that
we must build together a
new agriculture an agriculture that
is more just an agriculture that is
more sustainable an agriculture that is
most beautiful thank you
[Applause]
[Music]
[Applause]
[Music]
[Applause]
[Music]
and me my goal tonight is to
to convince you that there is not only
people who are nice but also the
farmers all farmers the
world
in fact ten thousand years of
enough world farmers
he develops new systems the
meadow that you see there next to the
farm is the pastures and since milan and
so generations between generations the
farmers perfect their system
in a century
on average it increases by 10% the
food production and that’s
very well
and then in the 20th century is a revolution
a revolution that started
exactly one hundred years ago what a hundred years ago
we developed the first hybrid corn
a plant capable of assimilating a lot
of synthetic nitrogen of chemical azov
but for which it is necessary to use
pesticides and false insecticides
mechanized and thanks to this news
plants
in 40 years, we have tripled
global grain production tripled
and so actually this production
world cereal
it was a very good news we
found in a situation where in fact
we could on the one hand ensure
well-being of farmers on the other hand
provide consumers with food
abundant and cheap and finally
give food to the 4 billion
people who have joined our planet
during the twentieth century so the
news was extraordinary
so extraordinary that today
a Canadian farmer alone can
feed 5000 people today in
a texas farm where there are seven thousand
cows produced 150 thousand liters of
milk that too it may not tell you
a hundred and fifty thousand liters
milk in fact that’s what you’re going
consume in this room during the
next four years in texas have
healthy product in a day so it’s a
extraordinary model
it is a revolution it was called
this revolution the green revolution is
what this revolution has concerned all
the farmers of the world
but no it concerned especially the
northern farmers
and asia farmers today
80% of the farmers in the world are
farmers who work on
small areas less than two hectares
who works by hand with one or
as you see here
these little farmers can not
feed thousands of people they
feed a dozen people on
therefore finds himself in a situation where
to the north we produce on average by
nobody
a thousand times more than what
produces a southern farmer
you imagine the inequality that has
installed between north and south
in addition to the technological miracle of the 20th
century has become an ecological disaster
today farmers complicity
for their productivity
at the end of the twentieth century they are accused
of all the evils he rules the crime
1 they destroy our health it spoils
our water they make disappear the
biodiversity decision trajectory
twentieth century had not taken into account
environmental impacts and
today there is one thing on which
everyone agrees that is that
this trajectory is not the right one
for agriculture we have to find
another way because this way he
is not sustainable in the 21st century
given the climatic problems seen the
limitation of resources
ok so what do we do we will
look for another model and fortunately
we found another model this other
model
it actually comes from the south and peasants from
south and bears a very beautiful name he
is called agroecology agroecology
does that mean what the name says
means doing farming and in
same time of ecology it means
unlike the model of the twentieth century
no longer master nature but be
the ally of nature work
together imitate the natural systems
like here in the case of
agroforestry try to profit at
maximum services that we can
provide nature and this is a model that
works it’s a model that has been
defined at the very beginning there is a
thirty years in california which is
arrival in europe there are 10
with other researchers we have been
fascinated by this model have come
add NGOs civil society
today every year 1000 people
are united under the banner of a
project called agroecology
inaction it’s a model that even
convinced of the ministers it must be done
including the French Minister
stéphane farming the foll that has it
does a project for France so it’s
really a promising trajectory
for agriculture and yet I’m going
not tell you about this model am not
tell you about this model because ten
years after actually the consumption of
pesticides in France increased by 13%
ten years after very few farmers or
adopt the model of agroecology
so how is it possible that we have a
model that works and that no one
adopt it
in fact it’s because farmers
today are no longer able to
operate their systems
they no longer have decision-making power
is not they who decide prices this
is not they who decide what they
produce and so they are completely
dependent on a system that is dominated
on the one hand by agrochemicals
and on the other hand by the firms of
agrifood and for better you
make it clear I’m going to take two
examples it may be faster
and more fun for you first
example that concerns wheat all the
world knows the wheat and when you
think of the wheat automatically you
think of the pines wheat-flour-bread sin
trilogy that goes back to childhood did
part of our culture and our
knowledge today in Wallonia at
produced one million seven hundred thousand
tons of wheat 1 million 700 thousand tons
wheat what are we doing with this wheat
have made bread and well not actually
today in Wallonia we make bread
only with 9% of wheat with 9% of our
cereals makes bread 9% while so
we wanted to be self-sufficient
should use 28 % of our grain
to make bread then what do we do
with others 91 1% with others 91
1% actually made food for
animals mostly biofuels
especially here close to biot years and this
which remains of the remaining 13%
ex thus bears the choice that the system has
done with respect to cereals this is
not to devote them to manufacturing
of a food but it is the dispatcher
between its different uses
with the consequence that today a
Walloon farmer could feed
thousand people but in reality he does not
feeds that 200 it’s not his will
it’s the will of the system because in
more on this side a little aberrant of
the use of cereals
the farmer himself when he brings his
tipper it is unable to
know where she will finish if he goes
finish in a bread or in a bio
fuel
I promised you two examples on
second example I’m going to take
it is the milk issue that makes it the
milk to be a breeder and dairy producer
it’s really a very hard job to be
dairy farmer and producer
it’s really a very hard job each
day of the year you must truce to
cows morning evening every day even the
Christmas but November 11
you owe it to the cows and when the
end of the year dairy farmers
do their accounts
on average they did not gain anything from
everything and the years when prices are
bad on the world market because
it’s the global market that determines
the prices they may even have lost from
money and so they worked all
a year every day of the year and
they did not win anything at the end of this
year so how is it possible that he
continues but in fact they continue
thanks to you thanks to you because you
are the magicians who allow them to
continue to make milk you are
magicians because you give each
of you every European gives 100
euros per year for agricultural policy
common and its 100 euros per year they are
there to encourage agriculture and so
in fact the dairy farmers they
earn their living only in Wallonia
on basis and subsidies 100 % of their
income is a subsidy
if we extrapolate on a European scale
41 % of the income of all
farmers in europe it’s subsidy
we see the system in which we are
so well it was known zhi thanks to this
agricultural policy to more products
in addition to milk it’s great
product even so much
when you know more what to do with it and so
we have to export it we export to
Africa and now we start to
export it to China then alone and
I found them the European one
export I found them at callas at
burkina faso where I was this week and
welcoming European milk arrive
good he made quite a way first
we have a dryer to turn it
in beam then he made 5000 km in
boat to get to dakar then to
dakar 2300 kilometers to get to
kaya by the truck and when he gets to
create one is it useful and sold 45
cents per liter 45 cents per liter
this is the price at which samba diop that
you see here we’ll put the picture that
that he is smiling but he a little the
balls because he 45 saint of the liter
that’s the price at which he buys the milk
to local producers
he still has to transform it the
distribute them distribute in a
little plastic pocket like that and
give a little bit more money to
wholesalers his milk he sells it
70% in the market at 75 on the market
you imagine that today because we
on milk product in europe on
impoverishes and prevents the development
dairies in the south
we are in a paradoxical situation where
unlike what you are doing
sometimes believe to produce more does not allow
not feeding the planet
today has plenty to feed
all of the people who live
on earth
but the big problem is that
part of the peasants the planet are among
the poorest and suffer from hunger
and his peasants they are killed by a
system that actually export their
surplus to their country and prevents the
development of their sector so if
you want to remember one thing it’s more
we produce in the north the more we impoverish the
South
that’s it the real equation is so and
that’s not the farmers’ will
from the north who are dependent on subsidies
it is surely not the will
southern farmers in party
farmers from the north and south they
are in competition
they are opposed to each other without
that he never wanted
they are a bit like players from
clickair you say to cork I believe some
eqiiaire players who are in the process of
to be fixed on bars etc have done
play against each other by letting
to fall any solidarity between
agriculture they are put in
competition and so we’re in a
pretty hopeless situation
I had been told before you came
to do a smart tennis
saleh in inspiring mom i’m not
sure I ‘ve inspired you so far
I have the impression that you are
desperate and so he will stay me five
minutes actually conceals to try
to convince you that we have a role to
play around that and that we can
get to develop another vision of
the farmer one of our vision of
agriculture
another model I’m not going much
you talk about solutions because we
the technical solutions they exist
the trajectories
agroforestry I’ve already talked about
others the short circuits
organic farming are really
promising trajectories but you
understand it the problem is not
so much to have solutions
the problem is that these solutions are
set up in society
so the first thing to say is that
oil-based agriculture
we have good news agriculture
which I told you about at the beginning
based on oil and p6
of insecticides she took for 50
anyway she will disappear
because we do not have the resources to
maintain this type of agriculture
the whole question today is to
know how we are going to make the transition
between this model that has no none
future and a new model that’s it
question today
so in fact we are a little lost knows
not how to do when you are lost
there are two possible strategies
the first is to start walking
are you saying I’m going to find my
way one moment or another it’s a
little strategy to observe one who
today develops new
models without really knowing about that
the horizon he is heading
on my side I chose to
specialize in the discussion of this
horizon in scenarios for the future
with my team we have established
scenarios that shows that in Wallonia
we could in 2050 feed on base
of a model where there is 40% agriculture
biological and the rest is in
respectful agriculture
the environment
what we actually do is we
establishes card species
which allows to see where we should go there
there was a map that was available it was
that of the green revolution
but this card she is now
surpassed she us in the world brought us
at the top of the mountains
but today we know that she
leads to a precipice so you have to
open new paths and its
new trajectories
we can build them around three
great principles and for each of these
principles
you have a role to play first
principle is changing the goal
always produce more have a
food always cheaper it’s
impossible it is a path that
nowhere
what to do is to produce better
and pay the right price
we know then some models get
developed
I talked about short circuits
local organic farming
so we have models that work
but it remains on a very small scale and
often they are perceived as
models to privilege and that’s
maybe a little bit true then the other
solution is to challenge yourself to
change goals not a title
individual but as a society
in fact we are in a society where
we are watered with advertising or our
consumer choice in particular
are totally conditioned
I told you earlier that
farmers did not know what we
was making their wheat but you know you
where does it come from the wheat that was in your
bread this morning do you know how it is
possible that we offer you to you
pizzas at 3 euros
it seems logical to you that we can
make a pizza for 3 euros
we do not know and so the first step
if we want to change the objectives it is
to ask the systems over
transparency to question
individually collectively on the
how the system works
today and departing from saint de
set new goals for the system
this is the first step
the second principle that I propose to you
it’s about changing the target
today the ages are going to employ a
rather Brussels word farmers
they are a bit like a gaulle peak calf
they are the target
all the attacks the farmers on
accuses them of poisoning us for being
disregard of animal welfare
they are asked to stop using
pesticides as if farmers
were autonomous
in fact if today we use
pesticides including potato
it’s because we decided to export 85
% Belgian potatoes it’s not a
choice of farmers that’s a choice
of a society and so the second thing
to do is change the target
I think there is no hope if the
agriculture society then oppose
there are farmers who really are
pioneers who have developed
new systems
with that we enjoy talking but the
others often despises them often
the cartoons I think the second
step is to reconcile the majority
farmers with society
why the majority farmers because
that the majority of farmers in
daily he works with nature and
so they want to have
more agro-ecological systems and if they
do not do it it’s not bad
will or by incompetence but that’s
because they are in a points system
separate the over- indebtedness stuck by
the models that are imposed on them and so if
we members of civil society we
we did not reconcile with
farmers
we will never be able to get out of
the impasse in which we put the
green revolution
the third and last principle is
a principle it is a principle that
it was going to surprise you
I saw three years ago a film this movie
you may have seen it too
it’s called tomorrow when out of
movie I was angry I was angry
because in this film we were told
during 20 minutes of agriculture during
20 minutes we’ve seen initiatives from
small local initiatives and we have not seen
no farmer or farmer none
farmer neither north nor south
how can we talk about agriculture if
we do not talk about farmers so me
I have nothing against small
solutions
small initiatives they are very
nice she explores
new trajectories
but to make believe that stars of
reconverted cinema you feed us
it’s a little naive what we
feed and feed tomorrow those
farmers of today and tomorrow
and so I propose you this is
maybe to participate in small steps
it’s nice but at the same time to try
to see wide to see big to try
set to change system
which we and the farmers
are stuck
it will seem impossible to you
will say but our words are not coming
not small scale
how do you want us to go
arrives at large scale well I you
give an example that really gave me
of hope at the beginning of this year
morocco citizens and we do not know
the origin of the movement and locating decided
to boycott the largest group
global dairy and two weeks after
a few weeks after they have
started this boycott
the boss of this big group who wins
several million euros a year
elsewhere came to morocco and to negotiate
with the Moroccans by promising them
more local agriculture and a
agriculture more respectful of prices
give to producers
so I think it’s possible I
think there’s way to see the ark and
so if we have more agriculture
transparent more systems
transparent a reconciliation a
new announcement the farmers and
that we take the problem to great
ladder
I think there is a future for
agriculture anyway it’s a
need
a billion people today on
the planet live from agriculture
and it is with them and not against them that
we must build together a
new agriculture an agriculture that
is more just an agriculture that is
more sustainable an agriculture that is
most beautiful thank you
[Applause]
[Music]
Please follow and like us: