they’re the two most popular military
franchises ever created welcome to
watchmojo.com and in this showdown EA’s
Battlefield franchise goes head-to-head
with Activision’s Call of Duty series
only one can emerge victorious let the
battle begin round one single-player
campaign starting off our showdown is
the story driven campaign sections of
the Call of Duty and Battlefield
installments this is the section that
should always deliver the goods in terms
of memorable characters cinematic events
and gripping single-player experiences
while we are huge fans of the team
dynamic and characters in the
battlefield bad company series which
debuted in 2008 the rest of the
Battlefield series have completely
lacked similar personality or focus
opting for multiplayer like Mo’s filled
with AI BOTS on top of this the
single-player additions to the
Battlefield series have always felt like
an attempt to mimic the campaign’s of
its competitor and as such have fallen a
bit short Call of Duty on the other hand
has always been legendary for its
thrilling Hollywood inspired moments and
set pieces the recent additions of
identifiable characters and story has
been the result of the call of duty
series putting us in the role of
countless memorable soldiers making the
campaign sections of this franchise the
clear winner as a result the first point
goes to call of duty round 2 gameplay
and innovation from historical battles
in the past to modern warfare both
series have continued to adapt and
change for their audiences they have
also consistently borrowed popular
innovations from one another often
improving on them in the process from
the get-go battlefield has always
delivered via killer gameplay while Call
of Duty posted tighter gunplay that
being said recent battlefield games have
vastly improved upon their weapon
mechanics while keeping their vehicles
and scale because of this we’re going to
have to give battlefield the win the
score is now tied with one point each
round three graphics in this respect
Call of Duty has always delivered
visually stunning games but the limits
of its aging graphics engine has always
forced the series to focus on much
smaller environments and linear gameplay
as such good-looking though they may be
the past five iterations of the series
have yet to deliver a massively improved
visual experience
on the other hand battlefield cleans up
by showcasing much bigger landscapes and
an eye for large-scale details as a
result it continues to push the limits
of what technology can do and succeeds
in providing the most visually realistic
warfare experience the recent additions
even let you destroy elements of the
terrain thanks to their signature
frostbite engine because of this
battlefield jumps ahead by a score of
two to one round four instruments of
destruction having studied actual
military Arsenal’s both game franchises
share many similarities Call of Duty may
lack vehicles but that series has always
been better geared towards infantry
combat even though battlefields
vehicular edge is compelling to some
others feel as if their use is a bit
cheap this is reflected in the fact that
many PC servers often feature no vehicle
maps call of duty office better weapon
models and more interchangeable
accessories giving it a slight advantage
in this field due to this Call of Duty
regains its footing to cause another
draw round 5 multiplayer both are
incredibly popular for their focus on
online multiplayer
although Call of Duty continues to lag
behind the features offered by its
competitors this ranges from its
relatively small maps to total lack of
vehicles sure it tries to mix things up
a bit by providing gun and ability perks
but players are often left feeling like
the only surefire strategy is either to
rush opponents or camp out until an easy
kill presents itself interestingly one
of the most thrilling features is its
recent addition of the zombie survival
mode which is single handedly wide in
the appeal of the franchise despite this
lack of a horror themed mode battlefield
has always offered a much larger theater
of war for their players to stomp around
him the squad spawning mechanics coupled
with the greater emphasis on each
class’s supporting roles allows for much
more complex strategic possibilities and
of course battlefield fully incorporates
vehicles these add yet another layer to
the already deep strategic roster that
battlefield brings to the table and as
such propel disfranchise to multiplayer
dominance it also gives battlefield the
nod pushing its score over the edge to
claim victory the winner
battlefield series you ever asked
yourself on this part of the world gets
so double the
I just work here Dave it was a tough
fight while we loved both series
battlefield takes the top spot in this
showdown while call of duty follows a
more Rambo like cinematic approach
towards warfare the Battlefield
franchise has managed to deliver a
grander sense of scale where it counts
says you and what army what I just
always want to say that
franchises ever created welcome to
watchmojo.com and in this showdown EA’s
Battlefield franchise goes head-to-head
with Activision’s Call of Duty series
only one can emerge victorious let the
battle begin round one single-player
campaign starting off our showdown is
the story driven campaign sections of
the Call of Duty and Battlefield
installments this is the section that
should always deliver the goods in terms
of memorable characters cinematic events
and gripping single-player experiences
while we are huge fans of the team
dynamic and characters in the
battlefield bad company series which
debuted in 2008 the rest of the
Battlefield series have completely
lacked similar personality or focus
opting for multiplayer like Mo’s filled
with AI BOTS on top of this the
single-player additions to the
Battlefield series have always felt like
an attempt to mimic the campaign’s of
its competitor and as such have fallen a
bit short Call of Duty on the other hand
has always been legendary for its
thrilling Hollywood inspired moments and
set pieces the recent additions of
identifiable characters and story has
been the result of the call of duty
series putting us in the role of
countless memorable soldiers making the
campaign sections of this franchise the
clear winner as a result the first point
goes to call of duty round 2 gameplay
and innovation from historical battles
in the past to modern warfare both
series have continued to adapt and
change for their audiences they have
also consistently borrowed popular
innovations from one another often
improving on them in the process from
the get-go battlefield has always
delivered via killer gameplay while Call
of Duty posted tighter gunplay that
being said recent battlefield games have
vastly improved upon their weapon
mechanics while keeping their vehicles
and scale because of this we’re going to
have to give battlefield the win the
score is now tied with one point each
round three graphics in this respect
Call of Duty has always delivered
visually stunning games but the limits
of its aging graphics engine has always
forced the series to focus on much
smaller environments and linear gameplay
as such good-looking though they may be
the past five iterations of the series
have yet to deliver a massively improved
visual experience
on the other hand battlefield cleans up
by showcasing much bigger landscapes and
an eye for large-scale details as a
result it continues to push the limits
of what technology can do and succeeds
in providing the most visually realistic
warfare experience the recent additions
even let you destroy elements of the
terrain thanks to their signature
frostbite engine because of this
battlefield jumps ahead by a score of
two to one round four instruments of
destruction having studied actual
military Arsenal’s both game franchises
share many similarities Call of Duty may
lack vehicles but that series has always
been better geared towards infantry
combat even though battlefields
vehicular edge is compelling to some
others feel as if their use is a bit
cheap this is reflected in the fact that
many PC servers often feature no vehicle
maps call of duty office better weapon
models and more interchangeable
accessories giving it a slight advantage
in this field due to this Call of Duty
regains its footing to cause another
draw round 5 multiplayer both are
incredibly popular for their focus on
online multiplayer
although Call of Duty continues to lag
behind the features offered by its
competitors this ranges from its
relatively small maps to total lack of
vehicles sure it tries to mix things up
a bit by providing gun and ability perks
but players are often left feeling like
the only surefire strategy is either to
rush opponents or camp out until an easy
kill presents itself interestingly one
of the most thrilling features is its
recent addition of the zombie survival
mode which is single handedly wide in
the appeal of the franchise despite this
lack of a horror themed mode battlefield
has always offered a much larger theater
of war for their players to stomp around
him the squad spawning mechanics coupled
with the greater emphasis on each
class’s supporting roles allows for much
more complex strategic possibilities and
of course battlefield fully incorporates
vehicles these add yet another layer to
the already deep strategic roster that
battlefield brings to the table and as
such propel disfranchise to multiplayer
dominance it also gives battlefield the
nod pushing its score over the edge to
claim victory the winner
battlefield series you ever asked
yourself on this part of the world gets
so double the
I just work here Dave it was a tough
fight while we loved both series
battlefield takes the top spot in this
showdown while call of duty follows a
more Rambo like cinematic approach
towards warfare the Battlefield
franchise has managed to deliver a
grander sense of scale where it counts
says you and what army what I just
always want to say that
Please follow and like us: