Press "Enter" to skip to content

What could be better than glocalization? | David Randall | TEDxKingstonUponThames


[Applause]

okay so we I think we find ourselves I’m

sure you’ll agree with me in a period of

time where there is a shift in the

tectonic plate your light of history

we’ve had them before from a European

perspective they’ve happened quite often

they happen they happen at a 30 or 40

year interval we had during the First

World War the Russian Revolution he had

the depression after that we had another

war and the iron curtain came down in

the 1980s the end of the 1980s the Iron

Curtain went back up again and now we

find ourselves in another of those

periods in history which is very

disturbing and of course a great deal of

pain and anguish but can we do something

can’t will we as as Europeans as members

of the world and the emerge from this

stronger and better remains to be seen I

want to talk about globalization why

because I think as an individual is

interested in sustainable communities

I’m keen to debunk some of the

scapegoats if you like o our current

that become political dichotomy one of

which i think is globalization another

is the role of organizations and of

cooperation and I want to see what might

be a better method of disrupting the

status quo and building it again so that

it is better so let me go into a little

bit of detail first about globalization

so globalization occurred in two waves

in modern times the first wave was from

1820 through to about 1914 driven by by

technology by fast travel around the

world and the second wave occurred run

about this time so this is a 90 end of

the 1950s where air travel made the

exchange of goods and service

is very very quick indeed so this

particular song came out 1958 and if you

listen to the words we get a bit of a

musical interlude you’ll see you’ll get

a sense of the optimism of the time so

[Music]

remember a couple of countries there

were mentioned India was mentioned and

Peru was mentioned so if you if you

chart the success or otherwise of

globalization India ISM is one of those

countries that’s benefited enormously

gdp per capita is up there’s an emerging

middle class in India China is another

country but there are losers there were

losses in this phenomenon countries like

countries in some countries in Africa

and some in South America where poverty

is not it has not improved particularly

so you got if you take Haru as an

example because Peru was mentioned it so

by in 1971 so you rolled on a few years

from when Frank Sinatra was saying in

his hole in the UK almost everybody

that’s ninety-one percent of households

had the television set whereas in a

country like Peru which is mid-table you

know in terms of GDP per capita only one

in five have so by this time already

particularly in this second wave of

globalization which brought with it not

just the exchange of goods and services

with the exchange of ideas and people

could see how poor they were there came

an awareness that there was in equal

theatre world and the Peruvians found a

voice to this guy this is gustavo

gutierrez and he said that the poor are

a byproduct of the system in which we

live and for which we are responsible he

didn’t say but what she you are

responsible he was writing this in the

practical theology of liberation in 1971

his point being there is a systemic

failure to to spread wealth evenly

around the world and that inequality is

systemized systematize if you take

another perspective on globalization

globalization is not about dumping ideas

and other people this general gentleman

is Roland Robertson and he was writing a

sociologist he wrote in 1992 that

globalization is particular eyes as well

as is a particular izing as well as

univer universalizing phenomenon so you

could take something like rock and roll

you can you can broadcast it to japan

and what you get back is something

completely different he even to the

level of you know cultivating rice in a

paddy field so that might be a new

technology for one culture or other but

you know the next door paddy field might

be cultivated in a completely different

way so we shouldn’t be considering

globalization as a yes as a wave if you

like of a foreign culture invading other

culture that was his point these

cultural icons are popular right round

the world yes they they might be

emanating from a single point actually

the second time Beyonce you do today and

also Schwarzenegger but they are popular

there they’re loved and there they

utilized and they’re also integrated

into cultures in a way that’s not

negative at all our very own our very

own a cultural hero I hope this isn’t an

image of how our esteem

yeah as Britain’s is going to gain it’s

going to be perceived world widen in the

coming years so what are we going to do

to improve our lot this is Nick stern he

was called next term when when I was at

University anyway now he’s Lord Nicholas

there however he took t-took he one of

the positive aspects of globalization

which is that we can make decisions

about climate change and he asked people

to be you know in the policy community

deliberate and to provide clear

direction for new development investment

and inclusive growth he said that

development banks were absolutely

critical are there enough of those

development bank resources around not

just to cope with climate change but to

implement policy in other directions as

well this is Nobel laureate and

economist Joseph Stiglitz what he had to

say particularly in the context of

neoliberalism which is again something

not to be confused with globalization

neoliberalism is about you know opening

up trade making decisions about terrace

and barriers and that kind of thing what

he was saying that the problem that

we’re facing is that economic

globalization has outpaced political

globalization and according to stiglitz

we need more we need to act more

cooperatively we don’t have overarching

decision making so rolling back on

cooperative structures is not something

that stiglitz would advocate this is

Nigel Cameron we’ve had a lecture

already today about robotics artificial

intelligence what Cameron is saying is

that we got to embrace technology he’s a

futurist he’s got a Washington think

tank and he talks about technological

unemployment that is coming down the

road Attis this is something that we’re

going to embrace because it’s going to

be good we’re going to take however any

casualties there are in the road on

Rose today and we’re going to reduce it

to next to nothing it’s a good thing

there are already tractors in the course

of production that can take the labor

out of farm work because they can fully

autonomous you may have seen an

advertiser area showcase on the TV

recently but again just like Stieglitz

just like stern it’s the policymakers

that we’ve got the tape that have to

take the lead in coping with

technological unemployment Cameron says

that we’ve got to establish the consider

technology is just offering us tools we

have to establish the frameworks within

who was going to do this wonderful work

of established owners frameworks and

exploiting those tools there’s the

public sector and there’s a private

sector there’s a top-down policymaker

policy led agenda and there’s the

empowerment of brave people doing things

from the bottom up so if we take the

first example of how the public sector

can can disrupt I think this is in

recent memory one of the best examples

so long came john major in the late

1990s had a look at our performance in

atlanta in 1996 what we’ve got just one

gold medal and decided to completely

change the nature British sport it was

enabled through through two things

really one of which was funding through

the National Lottery and the other was a

selection process in which only a

limited number of sports were were

funded but funded at a very high level

at a level that enabled us to jump from

you know just one gold medal in 96 to

you know recently we came second in the

world with twenty seven gold medals it’s

a transformational change that will

achieve from the top down but what about

bottom-up changes who the other who the

rainmakers that are going to change our

lives and there are lessons from history

about how if we’re not careful we put

obstacles in the way of people and we

need to remove those obstacles this is

marie curie and obstacles she faced was

she yes as a woman she faced

discrimination there was in the case of

the second person there which is tommy

software the obstacle he felt was a

backlash from the establishment against

his success as an aircraft manufacturer

he was actually put out of business at

the end of world war one by a government

that was jealous of the money that he

made and they taxed it all back from him

it actually made him bankrupt so he had

to reinvent himself under the under the

Hawker label later on and the third

example this is this beefy guy is almost

unrecognizable that’s Richard Branson

what happened to Richard Branson in the

1990s were actually started Virgin

Atlantic was that the venn establishment

which was British Airways they didn’t

they were jealous of his success they

were unable to compete and they

attempted to put him out of business by

stealing passenger lists approaching

those people and trying to and try to

get the prom and they were they were

fined and Julie Julie reprimanded by the

cause but these people faced opposition

from the establishment which shouldn’t

be there another feature if you like of

a successful bottom-up transformational

disruptive change is that people can

this should be pigeonholed into just one

one approach this is Octavia Hill who as

well as being a social reformer she had

other interests as well so she was the

co-founder of a national trust and she

also brought about each who almost

invented really social work so she was a

polymer and you know she worked across

disciplines the same with Lord Michael

Young in the middle as well as

establishing that consumers association

which he was also found during the open

university as well of another number of

other initiatives and this is terence

conran at the end there and terence

conran as well as being a wonderful

designer he had to invent his own route

to market which was the habitats doors

because he couldn’t get retailers to

take his innovative design you know

changes and innovations that can take

place that do have a transformation

whole fake arm examples like you see you

see there so this is a housing

development I took place in bordesley

and West Birmingham run by the accord

Housing Association and they dealt with

two issues they dealt with unemployment

because they’ve taken 11 unemployed men

sorry and they’ve given them they’ve

given them

housing through self build so they

actually trained him to build those

houses and they’re now living in the

next example is a very good example of a

disruptive approach to dealing with the

proper dimension which was to provide

housing for people in a very safe

environment that is at the same time

stimulating so these are elderly people

that’s on the top left is place called

hoga we just outside on down and on the

bottom right is within Shore just

outside Bristol and these are dementia

villages with a very holistic approach

to looking after people that gives them

both the freedom to interact freely in

their sort of a non care environment but

at the same time it is a safe

environment don’t have their needs met

and then finally this is an example of a

very good work work space development

down in Hastings which has been run by

so this is an organization sorry White

Rock neighborhood ventures led by jess

Steele who some of you might know

through an organization called locality

and what they’ve established through the

development trust and they now know that

that no one can throw them out and as

jess steel has said the way to take

action if you’re serious about

community-based development is to buy

property to take it off the market which

they’ve done success very successfully

down there in down in Hastings through

the vehicle their development trust so

to sum up change is definitely required

now as back never before we need

transformational people and we need

transformational policies and we need to

remove the barriers to change that

individuals experience from that from

that from the bottom are but also

barriers that governments face to change

because

haven’t got cooperative structures so we

need those channels for people to work

together so you do have overarching

decision-making so you can make changes

on things like climate change and you

can mitigate the effects with

technological unemployment etc and we

need to operate on the small as well as

the large scale which is why I like

people like you and me we have a role to

play in this and i always think we

should we should wishes we should wish

ourselves good luck in overcoming fear

and adopting the strategies to bet to be

the best we can hi grandma [Applause]

Please follow and like us: