[Music]
joaquin is a name of the neighborhood
Mexican
that has many animals
He has taken a lot of love and among them
is the mare cinnamon
this mare has taken a very loving
special because it leads us to happen to
who are we a little empathetic that
we love animals but in this
moment he is very worried
because the federal authority of the
ranching has ordered that I killed your
mare
and has ordered it to consider that
has the disease that represents a
risk to public health
the scenario is not very good because
normally until a tree when they go
when they find a disease what
kill cut it
and very naturally this is how the
animals too
but joaquin does not give up and
decides to go to the amparo trial
this corresponds to a court
whose rapporteur interprets the constitution
politics of mexico in its article 1 that
it means
to human rights in the sense
that when good
falls on a living being
you can not order his death
simply
as a preventive measure but
abounds in this and says that the rights
humans per se transcend the life of
other beings regardless of their species
this is incredible that happens
in a country like mexico but it’s
happening and the strength of society
In fact, the rights of the
animals are not something new in mexico
since the 19th century
We were vanguard with Belisario
Dominguez with Benito Juarez
subsequently started carranza to such
level that in 1871 the penal code already
sanctioned the mistreatment of animals and
all the
shows with animals was considered
that while man could eat or
dress with them
remember 19th century today there are a lot
more alternatives
it was not conceivable that someone would
enjoy with the suffering and the
death
had to spend a few decades to
what
will start with timid laws first in
the 40s in the state of mexico in the
80s in the city of Mexico and
subsequently in other entities in
shy cities and it seemed that
legislator wanted to justify himself
it said we protect the animals for being
useful to man he could not understand the
legislator who deserved respect in
function of its intrinsic value as
living beings
for me this started being me very
little
why
my empathy was somehow natural
to see how all the puppies in the
skinny streets
but something that marked me in a very
special everything took my father to see
once closed
this for me a real shock I do not
I could understand what I saw in my eyes and
course
the look and the laments of that
little animal that was unable to make him
hurt anyone
it marked me
he left me an assignment
to do something
there years after taste to put in
spectacular against emails from all
in front of that place
being a law student what is not
could understand from my teachers or the
legislators is that they seemed the same
a stone or a chair that a being with
brain with eyes with legs with his
ability to get closer and away from
what he likes to return sacred
it gives terror
they forgot even that we
we belong to the same kingdom as all
we are animals
and they forgot the examples so
important in other nations
in progress to protect the new
hands
you have the transcendence of this new
vision of the judicial power of the
federation
when I founded medea more than 21 years ago
the Mexican association for rights
of the animals I decided to put this
name of animal rights to challenge
to the thinking of colleagues lawyers
many of them still sting
to think that we are not this kind of
demigods
that we are not above others
by the mere fact of being
Of course I was also interested in doing
an interdisciplinary team work
to put the professionals to
service of this cause not be
improvising this is something very serious that
it has to do with the environment and it has
what to see above all with social peace
what we are looking for is that these
were respected that mentality
will change and that will work with the
laws for them
within the learning that I went
getting in the middle because obviously
there was this same question of doing
team but especially looking
results for us did not matter
that we achieve a protective law of
animals if it did not reach
an animal
we could not celebrate a law if we did not
we were celebrating that we had
removed the suffering to a being
the law of course also requires
policies of instruments that make it
easy to apply and where to take
the animals how to rescue them and that
have a good destination
and the tenacity of course it’s going to be
a very important weapon so that we do not
let’s drop and move on
the resolution
and you can see the magistrate there
responsible name of a very high position
of an enormous simplicity and that since
then
he saw with that clarity of mind the
transcendence of human rights to
through the principle of progressivity of
these what what it means is that the
human rights are protecting more and more
to all beings vulnerable to all
those discriminated against and here we are
talking about discrimination by
species and had this sharpness to see that
this principle allowed to reach the
of different species
also the constitution speaks of the medium
suitable environment for our health and
development and that allows us to fight the
right that we have empaths and
sensitive not to be suffering from the
savages that exist on the street
openly like the pamplonadas or
know what happens inside intramurals in a
trace for example
the moral circle has expanded the
moral circle is now demonstrated
also that has permeated the
authorities of the highest level to
have this sentence because we
we compare
to the issue of slavery with what you
occurs to non-human animals from
then the arguments are very similar
there is talk that the other the vulnerable is
that the one at our mercy is a
to be without a soul without rights
but in reality the only thing that they are
doing is defending his disability
to get on each other’s feet with
the legs are the other’s hooves and their
business of course the reality of the
humans leads us to imagine that
it would be a pig
and to be
in a box inside a truck
we will be a little eyes and visualize
that push us with other little pigs up
that we lose strength we lose the
breath
and our extremities vanish and
we are drowning of our own
excrement
we would settle for a law or a
smile of a deputy what we want
is to be out of there the same thing happens
with a bull when he is in the middle of
he rolls and is being tortured receives
harpoon spears
knives
he is not interested in someone saying
there that is an art
all he wants is to be free and
stepping on the grass
without empaths we would like
we can answer it all easily
there are enough laws today
so that the animals had a
much better life but they are not
applying are not serving is
necessary to make more laws clear that no
what we need is to focus on the
effective application of these as in what
that if it’s worth to legislate is in
matter of education we have to break
many schemes because we keep seeing
chickens as egg factories or
Little pigs like chops
he can remember that all of them
they feel they have needs
what we need for the laws to be
they are applying in reality
Of course they change the profiles of
the authorities there have to be people
that is healthy psychologically that is
able to put himself in the place of
others and have the preparation
adequate to know of rights
animals
we have some unpleasant tendencies
in what has been happening in the country
on animal protection
this has become a lot in fashion
we see celebrity characters
thus taking a fame
to legislators also as a gain
politics
but we should approach the
examples of true effectiveness when
a society as a whole both
authorities like the citizens themselves
have been very successful in defending
the animals and the case is
medellín-colombia I really invite you to
that they go there is enviable neither
Europeans have that protection to
animals and the only thing that has generated is
Have a beautiful city with a lot
peace is a huge change
I have a dream that I’m going to talk about
little bit at the end about the ombudsman
national that I think we need
as a citizen link so that the
things change and of course the academy
It is also an example of a trend
what is happening at the international level
with chairs for the rights of the
animal public shelters because the
people have to be carrying a
government work and do so
well with love towards animals without
torture them
and as the fusion function used to say
that is successful with both
public as well as private institutions in
the parts of the world is essential
Of course if the law matters from
then it is this that regulates both
universal values such as the morality of a
epoch in a given place and from
then empathy shows her the one
exists between rulers and governed is
which it sets the limits for the
selfish do not do not put their reason to be
the true application inhibits the
violence because it is exemplary we talk about
the exemplarity of the penalties of course
there must also be mechanisms of
rehabilitation of both the victims
as victimizers that does not serve
bring a subject to jail if not
they have psychological treatment and
psychiatric
of course educate we need to educate
how do i see the future
Of course empathy has to be
what governs us we have put
many times barriers to protect us
but the truth is that we need to be
in the place of others
the way to find peace will be to
through putting ourselves in the place of the other
and treat it like the golden rule says
of ethics as we would like to be
treated everyone
nowadays the
that there are infamous slaughterhouses although there
laws that prohibit this mistreatment but not
there are inspectors who monitor him
from the government
this is allowed consumption both
we as individuals go little to
little thinking about what we consume that
be free of animals and you do not have to
do it immediately I invite you to
one day a week do not eat meat with that
they will help a lot
and of course the government should have
tax incentives for industries or
Business
that use 0 animals in their processes
productive
of course he also observed an efficiency
legal has to fight the
impunity of nothing serves that there are laws
that did not apply before they come
new ones that do not apply either
and of course then that the voice is heard
of a national animal defender
preferably autonomous that is that
body with professionals who can
to change the public policies that
establish links and protocols
necessary for it to be applied with
all effectiveness the law and that animals
can be rescued
it’s in our hands
that we stop being what defined
arthur schopenhauer as hell in
that we have converted humans this
land for the animals we will be
ourselves and nothing we
who change this situation thanks
[Applause]
joaquin is a name of the neighborhood
Mexican
that has many animals
He has taken a lot of love and among them
is the mare cinnamon
this mare has taken a very loving
special because it leads us to happen to
who are we a little empathetic that
we love animals but in this
moment he is very worried
because the federal authority of the
ranching has ordered that I killed your
mare
and has ordered it to consider that
has the disease that represents a
risk to public health
the scenario is not very good because
normally until a tree when they go
when they find a disease what
kill cut it
and very naturally this is how the
animals too
but joaquin does not give up and
decides to go to the amparo trial
this corresponds to a court
whose rapporteur interprets the constitution
politics of mexico in its article 1 that
it means
to human rights in the sense
that when good
falls on a living being
you can not order his death
simply
as a preventive measure but
abounds in this and says that the rights
humans per se transcend the life of
other beings regardless of their species
this is incredible that happens
in a country like mexico but it’s
happening and the strength of society
In fact, the rights of the
animals are not something new in mexico
since the 19th century
We were vanguard with Belisario
Dominguez with Benito Juarez
subsequently started carranza to such
level that in 1871 the penal code already
sanctioned the mistreatment of animals and
all the
shows with animals was considered
that while man could eat or
dress with them
remember 19th century today there are a lot
more alternatives
it was not conceivable that someone would
enjoy with the suffering and the
death
had to spend a few decades to
what
will start with timid laws first in
the 40s in the state of mexico in the
80s in the city of Mexico and
subsequently in other entities in
shy cities and it seemed that
legislator wanted to justify himself
it said we protect the animals for being
useful to man he could not understand the
legislator who deserved respect in
function of its intrinsic value as
living beings
for me this started being me very
little
why
my empathy was somehow natural
to see how all the puppies in the
skinny streets
but something that marked me in a very
special everything took my father to see
once closed
this for me a real shock I do not
I could understand what I saw in my eyes and
course
the look and the laments of that
little animal that was unable to make him
hurt anyone
it marked me
he left me an assignment
to do something
there years after taste to put in
spectacular against emails from all
in front of that place
being a law student what is not
could understand from my teachers or the
legislators is that they seemed the same
a stone or a chair that a being with
brain with eyes with legs with his
ability to get closer and away from
what he likes to return sacred
it gives terror
they forgot even that we
we belong to the same kingdom as all
we are animals
and they forgot the examples so
important in other nations
in progress to protect the new
hands
you have the transcendence of this new
vision of the judicial power of the
federation
when I founded medea more than 21 years ago
the Mexican association for rights
of the animals I decided to put this
name of animal rights to challenge
to the thinking of colleagues lawyers
many of them still sting
to think that we are not this kind of
demigods
that we are not above others
by the mere fact of being
Of course I was also interested in doing
an interdisciplinary team work
to put the professionals to
service of this cause not be
improvising this is something very serious that
it has to do with the environment and it has
what to see above all with social peace
what we are looking for is that these
were respected that mentality
will change and that will work with the
laws for them
within the learning that I went
getting in the middle because obviously
there was this same question of doing
team but especially looking
results for us did not matter
that we achieve a protective law of
animals if it did not reach
an animal
we could not celebrate a law if we did not
we were celebrating that we had
removed the suffering to a being
the law of course also requires
policies of instruments that make it
easy to apply and where to take
the animals how to rescue them and that
have a good destination
and the tenacity of course it’s going to be
a very important weapon so that we do not
let’s drop and move on
the resolution
and you can see the magistrate there
responsible name of a very high position
of an enormous simplicity and that since
then
he saw with that clarity of mind the
transcendence of human rights to
through the principle of progressivity of
these what what it means is that the
human rights are protecting more and more
to all beings vulnerable to all
those discriminated against and here we are
talking about discrimination by
species and had this sharpness to see that
this principle allowed to reach the
of different species
also the constitution speaks of the medium
suitable environment for our health and
development and that allows us to fight the
right that we have empaths and
sensitive not to be suffering from the
savages that exist on the street
openly like the pamplonadas or
know what happens inside intramurals in a
trace for example
the moral circle has expanded the
moral circle is now demonstrated
also that has permeated the
authorities of the highest level to
have this sentence because we
we compare
to the issue of slavery with what you
occurs to non-human animals from
then the arguments are very similar
there is talk that the other the vulnerable is
that the one at our mercy is a
to be without a soul without rights
but in reality the only thing that they are
doing is defending his disability
to get on each other’s feet with
the legs are the other’s hooves and their
business of course the reality of the
humans leads us to imagine that
it would be a pig
and to be
in a box inside a truck
we will be a little eyes and visualize
that push us with other little pigs up
that we lose strength we lose the
breath
and our extremities vanish and
we are drowning of our own
excrement
we would settle for a law or a
smile of a deputy what we want
is to be out of there the same thing happens
with a bull when he is in the middle of
he rolls and is being tortured receives
harpoon spears
knives
he is not interested in someone saying
there that is an art
all he wants is to be free and
stepping on the grass
without empaths we would like
we can answer it all easily
there are enough laws today
so that the animals had a
much better life but they are not
applying are not serving is
necessary to make more laws clear that no
what we need is to focus on the
effective application of these as in what
that if it’s worth to legislate is in
matter of education we have to break
many schemes because we keep seeing
chickens as egg factories or
Little pigs like chops
he can remember that all of them
they feel they have needs
what we need for the laws to be
they are applying in reality
Of course they change the profiles of
the authorities there have to be people
that is healthy psychologically that is
able to put himself in the place of
others and have the preparation
adequate to know of rights
animals
we have some unpleasant tendencies
in what has been happening in the country
on animal protection
this has become a lot in fashion
we see celebrity characters
thus taking a fame
to legislators also as a gain
politics
but we should approach the
examples of true effectiveness when
a society as a whole both
authorities like the citizens themselves
have been very successful in defending
the animals and the case is
medellín-colombia I really invite you to
that they go there is enviable neither
Europeans have that protection to
animals and the only thing that has generated is
Have a beautiful city with a lot
peace is a huge change
I have a dream that I’m going to talk about
little bit at the end about the ombudsman
national that I think we need
as a citizen link so that the
things change and of course the academy
It is also an example of a trend
what is happening at the international level
with chairs for the rights of the
animal public shelters because the
people have to be carrying a
government work and do so
well with love towards animals without
torture them
and as the fusion function used to say
that is successful with both
public as well as private institutions in
the parts of the world is essential
Of course if the law matters from
then it is this that regulates both
universal values such as the morality of a
epoch in a given place and from
then empathy shows her the one
exists between rulers and governed is
which it sets the limits for the
selfish do not do not put their reason to be
the true application inhibits the
violence because it is exemplary we talk about
the exemplarity of the penalties of course
there must also be mechanisms of
rehabilitation of both the victims
as victimizers that does not serve
bring a subject to jail if not
they have psychological treatment and
psychiatric
of course educate we need to educate
how do i see the future
Of course empathy has to be
what governs us we have put
many times barriers to protect us
but the truth is that we need to be
in the place of others
the way to find peace will be to
through putting ourselves in the place of the other
and treat it like the golden rule says
of ethics as we would like to be
treated everyone
nowadays the
that there are infamous slaughterhouses although there
laws that prohibit this mistreatment but not
there are inspectors who monitor him
from the government
this is allowed consumption both
we as individuals go little to
little thinking about what we consume that
be free of animals and you do not have to
do it immediately I invite you to
one day a week do not eat meat with that
they will help a lot
and of course the government should have
tax incentives for industries or
Business
that use 0 animals in their processes
productive
of course he also observed an efficiency
legal has to fight the
impunity of nothing serves that there are laws
that did not apply before they come
new ones that do not apply either
and of course then that the voice is heard
of a national animal defender
preferably autonomous that is that
body with professionals who can
to change the public policies that
establish links and protocols
necessary for it to be applied with
all effectiveness the law and that animals
can be rescued
it’s in our hands
that we stop being what defined
arthur schopenhauer as hell in
that we have converted humans this
land for the animals we will be
ourselves and nothing we
who change this situation thanks
[Applause]
Please follow and like us: