Press "Enter" to skip to content

Gendering the Refugee Crisis | Sara McKinnon | TEDxUWMadison


imagine you’re a nine-year-old girl and

at age nine you live in a small town

with approximately 20 of their families

and those civil war is happening in the

country that you live in the town that

you live in is relatively safe and

peaceful and then things begin to change

a group of Fighters moves to your town

they come to recruit and they recruit or

rather force community members to

participate they come at night they

knock on doors they beat people they

take men one per family and this happens

for years and as the war continues on

the military of your country also come

to town and at first they come to town

saying that they’re there to help with

the fighters that have entered into your

hometown in instead of being a source of

help they become a source of intense

fear and harm over the course of years

military official physically and

sexually assault community members

someone is raped by soldiers every eight

to 15 days and at age 19 it happens to

you you’re hurt bleeding ashamed you go

to your aunt’s house to heal and your

aunt tells you that you should leave the

country for safety elsewhere and after a

few days you do after a few days you

make a trek northward you know no one in

the country that you move to but you

make the trek northward and you make it

there and you never returned home again

never again do you see your family this

is the story of Rana Isabel Garcia

Martinez of Guatemala and in 1998 she

attempted to receive refugee status in

the United States on the basis of her

experiences with gender-based violence

the immigration judge hearing her case

told her that she could not substantiate

that she was a victim of past

persecution and she failed to show

according to this judge that her attack

had anything to do with her race her

religion her nationality her membership

in a political social group or or her

political opinion instead the judge said

that her experiences with sexual

violence were personal they were

personal in nature and an act that was

done personally by this soldier there

was no evidence that the act was

condoned by her government Rana was

denied Asylum unfortunately rayna’s

experiences are not unique in the United

States and around the world we have a

gender problem in the way we recognize

refugees and receive refugees and to

address this refugee crisis here and

around the world I think we must begin

to think differently about this gender

problem I suggest that to take gender

seriously as well as a number of other

categories that force people to flee

sexuality environmental degradation

poverty we may need to think about a

problem of categories and categorization

as a source of what often is used to

determine who counts as a refugee but

can then become a source of exclusion

I’m also going to suggest that we have

some deep thinking to do about gender

and taking gender seriously and

gender-based violence seriously so in my

talk for today what I want to do is to

provide a scope of the refugee problem

and how gender fits within this I’ll

then narrow to the United States to show

how the United States has addressed

gender in its refugee and asylum system

and then I’m going to end by talking

about how us as you members of us

public’s and the global community can

begin to think about moving and

directions that take gender seriously in

addressing the refugee crisis so

according to the united nations high

commissioner for refugees there are

currently sixty 5.3 million forcibly

displaced

persons in the world today and women and

girls make up half of that number and

they often experience sexual and

gender-based violence as a key of their

factors were needing to leave home and

this is much like the experience of rain

on and really the examples are too many

reports coming out of the European

crisis currently for example illustrate

that not only is sexual and gender-based

violence something that causes one to

flee but it’s also a common part of the

path to exile the migration the movement

similar accounts have been given by

Central American and Mexican women

coming to the United States and Canada

the journey can be as heroin as the

reasons we’re leaving sexual violence is

at the same time exceptional as it is

quite routine and mundane the United

Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

also states that it really has no way to

prevent this sort of violence that’s

happening as individuals are fleeing

places of conflict and unfortunately

once women arrive in a country and begin

to seek asylum their ability to gain

asylum on the basis of experiences of

gender and sexuality related violence

are equally slim and so I want to turn

now to talk about how the u.s. manages

this problem how the u.s. negotiates the

gender problem in accepting refugees and

asylum seekers so in the United States

the 1980 refugee act is really important

in understanding who gets to be a

refugee and under this act two systems

for accepting refugees were established

the first is this system of refugee

resettlement and this is what we hear a

lot about when individuals are talking

about asylum and refugee resettlement

today in this context mass groups of

people flee civil conflict often go to

another country and take up settlement

in a refugee camp and then at a point

often decades international workers will

say there is no end in sight to the

conflict that these individuals had to

leave and so permanent resettlement is

really necessary and so the United

States is one country that recognizes

and welcomes refugee resettlement

programs this is the process that Syrian

refugees that we are learning about

currently are working under the second

process is a process of asylum and this

is the process that Reina went through

and this is a process that happens when

an individual or maybe a family arrives

at are within the borders of the United

States and they say I have been

persecuted or I fear persecution I need

to remain in this country and they go

through a process of interviews and

immigration hearings and ultimately a

judge will decide what whether or not

you receive asylum and this is where

we’re really seeing significant problems

in the way gender is being recognized

and specifically with that refugee

definition and also the way in which

gender based violence is seen as

political persecution so if you’re like

Raina and you’re making an asylum claim

on the basis of having experienced

gender-based violence something like

rape or intimate abuse the category of

relief that you’ll ask for is as a

person who is a member of a particular

social group so the United Nations also

designated and provided us with a

definition of who counts as a refugee

and this definition is used throughout

the world to decide who is a refugee who

is not a refugee it states that a

refugee is someone outside of their

country that has a well-founded fear of

persecution on the basis of their race

religion nationality political opinion

or membership in a social group I want

you to take a minute with this

definition notice the categories that

are named as protected and what category

these are absent what seems strangely

absent to you as a category worthy of

protection for refugee status if you

were writing this definition today what

categories would you include would you

have any at all gender along with many

other factors that cause people to flee

is notably absent in this definition the

very construction of a system for

managing refugees really creates many

exclusions that don’t allow people to

have access to the protections that they

perhaps deserve and for women like Raina

who have made gender-based claims as

members of gendered social groups the

challenges have really been giant early

on in the United States women making

gender-based claims we’re told that

gender alone could not count as a social

group because more than half of a

country’s population does not count as a

social group it’s too big other women

took a more narrow approach and they

framed their claim their their social

group in ways such as being members of a

social group of poor women who have been

battered by their husbands and who

oppose male domination in these cases

the claimants were told that they

couldn’t count either because they

couldn’t prove that their husbands were

abusing them on the basis of their

membership that their husbands saw them

as that group and were thusly

persecuting them now in addition to

struggling to fit into the definition of

a refugee women claiming gender-based

violence as persecution have also been

denied Asylum because their experiences

with violence are seen as personal not

political this was the case for a

limpiar las Omaha no of El Salvador she

came to the United States to seek refuge

after a sergeant of the Salvador

Salvadoran army began to repeatedly and

violently physically and sexually

assault her as well as threatened her

life

and the judge in her case told her that

the case attests to evidence and

mistreatment of an individual but not

persecution the judge continued that

Olympia quote may indeed have suffered

emotional and physical abuse in the

course of her personal relationship with

sergeant zuniga but such mistreatment is

clearly personal in nature and does not

constitute political persecution with

the meaning of immigration laws these

cases and so so so many more show us

that particularly in the United States

we have a problem with seeing gender and

gender based violence as anything more

than just personal experience I think we

must learn to think differently about

gender and gender based violence if we

are significantly going to address the

world’s refugee crisis and I want to end

the first thing that we must do is we

must learn to take women’s claims

seriously in particular women’s claims

of violence this sort of thinking would

really mean a culture shift and it’s not

just in this international context that

this matters that women’s experiences

with sexual violence are devalued and

discredited but it’s also when we talk

about sexual assault on us college

campuses something that twenty three

percent of women undergraduate women in

college experience during their time on

campus or domestic violence something

that thirty percent of women worldwide

experience over the course of their

lifetime across these contexts women are

not believed not taken seriously they’re

devalued and discredited especially when

they begin to publicly named their

experiences what will it take to take

sexual and gender-based violence

seriously I think we must begin by

believing women second in addressing the

gender dynamic in the refugee crisis we

must begin by centralizing gen

as a fundamental aspect of all elements

of migration the need to flee your home

the path to migration wading in refugee

camps seeking permanent resettlement

each moment is fundamentally shaped and

impacted by the gender of the person

migrating and fleeing we can do a better

job of integrating a gender analysis

into policy and procedure and protocol

and according to human rights and aid

workers that are on the ground

oftentimes the steps are quite simple

and actionable we must centralized a

gender analysis finally I suggest that

we may need to go back to the

foundations of the modern refugee system

and really rethink seriously what

categories and categorization do who

categories and categorization serves in

my research about gender and sexuality

related Asylum cases in the United

States one thing that I found is that

rather than being a tool of organization

and welcome these categories those

mentioned in the refugee definition are

often used to exclude more than they

include so that refugee receiving states

use them as techniques and tools to to

say you can’t counter you don’t belong

rather than using them to allow people

entrance and hospitality now I don’t

know if I’m suggesting that a definition

without categories would impact and

change in significant ways the gender

problem I really do believe that that is

a culture change but I think that by

centralizing a gender analysis in the

way we develop and think about things

like refugee processes and systems we

can really begin to take women’s lives

seriously and this taking women’s lives

seriously not only improves women’s

lives but every person connected to that

woman Herc in her community all of these

individuals benefit when her experiences

are acknowledged

and received as valid and worthy of

protection I really believe we can take

gender seriously we must thank you [Applause]

Please follow and like us: