[Music]
we will start this question on is
tomorrow talking about science fiction
it seems like a good way to
to go into the matter but I wanted
when I talked a little bit with the
people who are busy with this
day to talk to you a little bit
another way of saying the
science fiction actually
today in any case it happens to me
quite often we are told
Can you tell us what
tomorrow will be done and what is going to be the
robotic less than are going to be the
artificial surfers tomorrow and my
first answer I do not know
already because I’m not a prophet I
am not in front but I do not have the
claim to know where we are going
against what I know relatively
Well that’s what I’m going to present to you
today in 18 minutes is that not
badly of people from the authors of
illustrators of the directors have
proposed through the fiction of
think not so much about this tomorrow as we
can fantasize who ever really
achieve as we wanted but
rather in this way than tomorrow to
already to be active in the everyday and
it’s a bit like this kind of grid of
reading that I want to share with you
today on a theme that me
seems pretty interesting that she has
left matic dedicated or d intelligence
artificial that we will link back
with the theme of robots
the occurrence in science fiction he
there is a kind of course that will be done
between the 1920s and today and
which goes through several themes
several figures that go from the created robot
in 1926 until today but
like any lecture a bit intellectual
will start with a diagram 1
usually science fiction the
consider but I promise you that I
you take a few minutes
for that we consider it a
way of reading our future or of
describe our future this absurd you
know that when you take a novel
well you do not read at all the opinion of the
future or present or past but
you see an intrigue a
Fantasy and fictional organization
of events in which we readers
or spectator we will dive to experience
emotions
this is called the narrative in the
narrative of fiction what is enough
particular in science fiction
it is that these stories and all of you
we had seen
suppose in your life well they have
some weird links is that there is
robots in the real world
and then to robots in science
fiction there are cyborgs in the world
real there are cyborgs the science
fiction etc. until dia and we are
do as we are kneaded with these scenarios
we spend our time talking to each other about
future to review movies that did not see
avatar who did not see for maybe
you are not at all the films whose
I spoke but who did not see
bladerunner etc
and then all that we keep it because
the advantage of the fiction favor it
stories are we get them
appropriate and we experience emotions
the problem is that when we think about
future of humanity to the future of robots
odesia we have call did not do
actually interfere with the scenarios we have
in the lead and then finally the reality
researchers the researchers say
we do not do the
science fiction wishes life the
science fiction writers tell us
are not cool futurists
life but the problem is that the
citizens we all are there
not specialists in one or the other
have a good tendency to mix
but the difference is that in the
science fiction and the fictional title
the stipulates well actually the robot is
not first the engineer robot
all in all a little interesting in a
fictional scenario but it’s first
a metaphor and I remind you that the
metaphor maybe for some it’s
an old memory was not first
nice picture to write a letter
of love although I used this guy
picture when I was 18 years old who did not
not market but it’s first and foremost
way
the only way to describe realities
anthropological
in other words, how do you explain
love better than with the flame
in love the love flame is a
metaphor not see that it’s good it’s
not to look pretty but it expresses
something that is difficult to
to express differently at once is
fascinating
it attracts both it can be
repellent both his consume one al
feeling that one is going to die at the
it’s reinvigorating all those things
all these elements there are constitutive
of this metaphor just stupid flame
in love and that’s why
French philosopher named Paul
ricoeur said that the metaphor was the
only way we humans have
to re describe the world differently and
for them describes our relationship to the world
we can try to write differently
but the metaphor is a good way
it was a good way of a good
how there intelligence and human
or human sensitivity
able to create new images
new images to understand
the man and the world in which he lives
and that’s the reading that I’m telling you
offers today through a
pretty fast course obviously saw the
time allotted to me between robots
and the ja the robots you know
maybe this play if you
know it you’re unhappy because
it’s a bad play
it’s called and rushed writing for 1926
and an edition the first edition
English text of 1923 but written by
a Czech writer karel capek who
tells in this play in
rather classic scenario
today you are on an island a
factory we manufacture human beings
in it we just took away the soul
it’s practical it’s human without soul
are very good workers
except that one day helene young woman who
is who took pity on these
robots goes to the island seduces them
engineers it’s not very complicated
seduces the engineers and then forces a
engineers breathed soul into
these robots 1 and infuses them with soul
is suddenly what rivals do they
revolt and they revolt they
draw humanity the play
ends with the fact that the last
human says goodbye to the robots they
will recreate a world
obviously this scenario that soon has 100
years old today
we still have it in the newspapers when we
tells us that the ja’s are going
destroy humanity where robots go
maybe take precedence over the man
but it’s not a very recent thing or
to be at the forefront of progress but in
done that’s not the case and rushed on the
bed like that we will say to mr had capek
anticipated the questions that arise in
particular since the 60s 70
not at all because capek would understand
something very good thanks to his
brother by the way yosef is that the
robot word in Czech means the
worker where the slave the translation
the prostate is the most just would be the
proletarian because you know
this story of rer
when you build men in
a company in which you remove me
serve the seat of the identity of
individuality for them to build
the world
then you find the fight of the
Marxist classes in other words and street r
and not first in stories that speak of
robots there are no robots of
engineers in the 20’s but he
just talking about a metaphor
the story of a metaphor of an image
who
speaks of the condition of the proletarians
who are humans of ceret back of
first robots are humans of
flesh and bones but whoever is removed
individuality
in other words the first robots are
humans who are alienated by a
capitalist system manufactured by the
industrial system is unable to
to rebel except when they find
their soul and I remind you that his
marks in communism there is this
idea that proletarians must
raise awareness of their conditions for
then to be able to revolt is
to take precedence over the capitalists
this is the image of the robot that will be
still a huge success in the United States
the play is played 1921 in prague in 1922
in Paris then 1923 in the United States in
particular to new york that’s going to be
retrieved by popular magazines
american so-called pulp
magazines and in these magazines poles on
will transform these capek robots here
we in 1926 we will transform robots
from capek to be metal to the go the
American religions and the committees of
censorship on popular magazines
prevents the man from being able to recreate the
artificially life man can create
machines artificially but not
humans we will mechanized them
wheels and we know these mechanized robots
since we do not know all this
movie that happens in 1927 fritz lang
based on a novel by his wife thea von
harbou called metropolis which is
a syncretism years on the one hand history
of capek which is read by the tea von harbou
is reinterpreted by fritz lang
and then the American robot imagery
metallic android metal and
it’s the collusion of these two
imaginary there that appears to be or
source of m police who also
use the robot as a metaphor
not of the capitalist but of
perverse tendencies of the man we will not
To linger
the robot will undergo a fairly evolution
important Belgian love the sequence
amazing when the android seduces all
men a little bit in a room
but the drummers you know we
hear a lot about it since we
speaks of empathy among their beauties that
blade runner is a source reference to
this empathy yes since in this film
that’s the only way there is
to distinguish a robot from a human is
make him pass a test the test of
empathy in this case we massacre
animals in front of him in general and the
falandry robot of the not so much of
reaction while the months a little
scared by the thing and this test there
allows to distinguish the two except that
if you read that in terms realizes
you say ah well we could do in
so that one day robots by themselves
proof of empathy
no not simulated but lived outside philip
k.dick the author of bendtner we did not
really nothing to do robots which
realizes is that in the states
united from the 60s since the film is
adapted from a 1960s novel whose
united states of the 60s
we are doing with
a consumption system that is green
strongly criticized by the counterculture
to which belongs philip k.dick that
to make human beings no longer
of empathy between them otherwise in
the movie the drummers the replicants has the
American word replica nt much more
interesting that the word robot android
the replicants are humans like
you and me it’s just that they have
abandoned their empathic faculties and
philip k.dick use this metaphor
of the robot either to talk about
conditions of the proletariat but for
talk about a condition from the 60s – 70s
of the human being from the 60s – 70s who
loses his empathy by living in
a world simulate that the world of
consumption in which the other is
more than an object or an object of
consumption the occurrence if we read that
like that so suddenly the movie
becomes critical who becomes reflexive he
sends us an image of ourselves that
to say and you are able
empathy
because if you are able
of empathy then you are a human so
you are not capable of empathy
what distinguishes you from a
replicating the answer is nothing and that’s
obviously the same strategy that is
used by molière in his theater
is that if I realize that I
as a human I do not have anymore
empathy with my peers
so I can thanks to the movie it works the
mother of his manners either but I
thanks to the film realize that I
did not want to be this hard to be
human without empathy and so I can
start to change my behavior
that’s why molière sets up
learned women if I laugh women
scholars and I realize that this is
a woman that sleeps scholar so I can
change my behavior
it’s called catharsis it
not walk but let’s go it’s all
case like that it works at
condition that I see in the
replicants of metaphors and not the
real robots that would one day be able
or endowed with empathy to say that beings
humans does not happen which is enough
amazing is that this robot figure
1920 and 1970 wholesale 1982 for the film
scarlley scott’s blade runner is going to be
transformed by a new metaphor it
appears each time whose meaning
representations of new metaphors
the love flame
appears during the rebirth in
particular these delays it does exist
not before is no love flame
it’s the Greeks except in the versions
Americanized of the Trojan War that
are going on screens now but
otherwise you do not have that so there are some
images that appear from time to time
time that can re describe the world
in a novel little known but who
is at the source of the film matrix 15 years
before since it’s really a 1984
willem gibson an american author of
science fiction invents invents
create a plot in which beings
humans connects to a space that he
calls cyberspace and therefore become
iia or any case they are humans
first connect to networks
computer then who are going nicely
to be drugged to this computer system this
who both a little bit of both young people who
especially when they can no longer get
connect and then after a while
they even leave their human bodies to
become iia and there he duplicate himself to
infinity
obviously when they duplicate to
the infinity the problem is that they
lose their identity that’s a little bit the
problem when one is much we
resell it’s a novel that will be 84 which
had gone relatively unnoticed apart
in the field of science fiction and
which is nevertheless one of the metaphors the
more powerful to understand that
our still current condition of beings
humans for ever speaks
connected is something else
that can be read through the avatar movie
what’s funny is that when
Gibson writes the novel he sees two
kids play on the interest the atari 2600
or remember was not a lot of pixels
is not a lot of colors but he
said it’s weird those kids are
leaving their bodies for
to live in another world
and it is exactly this type of stuff out
that we see in avatar do not have a
green fable based on pocahontas that
you really have to read that to the first degree
a really plan-plan what’s it like
if you think that Mrs. Bovary has
really existed there is a problem
interpretation
but when a movie comes out in the years
2000 and that’s called avatar which is the
name means and not to talk about
Buddhist deities but to speak
first characters that we
represents in video games one gets
realize that avatar 2 comes in movie
is strong and who talks about the connection
of the machine in end of the man in
digital networks
I remind you that jake sully
disabled like all of us since we
we all have 3d glasses that we are
let’s see the movie sex is not disabled
paraplegic can become a kind of
weird and ugly doll that is
treated only in digital images to
the end of the movie they even leave his
frail body
to become pure this pure image
digital it’s the transition between a
actor let’s say a real picture a
actor profit milk the actor as he
is racette actors-there who become
pure digital image
that’s exactly what he was saying in
neuromancer when I leave my body
to become a pure avatar 1
I remind you that the pure avatar is
one of the fantasies of these movements
Americans called the
transhumanism today they
imagine that one day we will be able to applaud
our brains in servers
computer sas and the extremes but
there are still people they
think and who receive more money
that gibson for neuromancer what is
interesting with that is that of
new beds to 1 who is connected
to the machine the one who becomes in
computer software to do
simple is not at first a true
software that becomes software
IT is first the trend
weird urban to denigrate his body and
his pulpit permanently for this fantasy
and through computing otherwise
said
the explosion of time that we have today
on social networks is not the
that we are all victims
although we have always been victims
are not all fat victims
American boxes but maybe a
much broader phenomenon
postmodern who sees in humans
a deep rejection of his flesh in
neuromancer 84,15 the hero says I am
fell into my dear 1’s prison and
that I can free myself I can go out
of that i can invent myself davis i can
to become someone else
many other people
which is the best metaphor for
no longer having a body is to be who we
wants by duplicating that the ia or that the
computer software will find in
average better news than that
to be complicated two movies a little
critical and I will finish on that which
also shows how science fiction
will dig deeper into this theme with
scenarios each time particular
different so that we can appropriate
the metaphors weirdly ever read
his films as metaphorical movies
transcendence the movie where fans of
johnny depp are very happy since
is multiplied very often on full
so we see it everywhere like that
yes when you have this phrase game
creating the day when the technology depa
will be the man in a science movie
fiction what we realize
is that this sentence says today
technology has already overtaken man
why because in transcendence
you have a character who is a
scientist who crosses the stop
the importance of development
technological who is the victim of a
bombing good American movie requires and
who’s going to be claude and tell himself he’s going
see his consciousness integrate a network
computer and it will make him become
can we mission like that and then he goes
so obviously the fact that he has more
of human limits he has more than
carnal boundaries he’ll start doing
just about anything makes it to the
end what we realize they
realize this is just the utopia of his
woman but who also shows that there
is not talking about the
technological singularity or our
to come up
but of this kind of temptations and I
finds that the incredible display for that
or the human being is growing in
train metaphorically from those digitized
it’s not really but in its
ability to be permanently connected
to computer networks or even to
having entrusted the management of his life to
computer networks that makes that this
addiction that was spoken gibson
whose new novel is hers
already there try to imagine how at one
sinks all cell phones
for three weeks I was thinking of 2,3
of which – who will do a little bit of small
heart attacks
I will end up by guys maquis d’al know
not if you saw this movie and who
combines all that that combines robots
and the ex machina ja ckoi young woman
relatively pretty we never see
really completely except at the end we
sees that his face stays on two
robots that is a robot
but we mainly learn that celia
strong enough for her to
managed to fulfill to meet the test of
turing as soon as she can make sure
that a human being can be wrong about
the status to be granted to this robot we put
a guy who looks a little bit like
mark zuckerberg so a guy a little bit of
18 years old do not feel comfortable with
women who can only fall in love with
fact that falls in love of course
and then follows in a set of
adventures not very important but what
what happens is that in the end they
manage to get out of his reserve
we understand that the imprisoned tax she
out of that she puts her skin on her
she’s going out into the real world and we’re
is said but it’s still terrible
these machines that will take precedence over
humans
except that we have forgotten something
that it be this woman there before she
can put back his skin is only a
robot to people they
experiment and want to sleep
with it in other words what better
you are there for the instrument
sexual instrumentalisation and
to use someone on their own
profit than turning into a robot there
I hope in any case that these few
questions that rises quickly but
hope in any case that these films we
interest you can see them
and remember that if fiction is
interesting is because we have
metaphors that if the metaphors
are interesting is that it’s
the only ways we have today of
really reinventing our world so that
our world is unlike him
future human here I thank you for your
Warning
[Applause]
[Music]
we will start this question on is
tomorrow talking about science fiction
it seems like a good way to
to go into the matter but I wanted
when I talked a little bit with the
people who are busy with this
day to talk to you a little bit
another way of saying the
science fiction actually
today in any case it happens to me
quite often we are told
Can you tell us what
tomorrow will be done and what is going to be the
robotic less than are going to be the
artificial surfers tomorrow and my
first answer I do not know
already because I’m not a prophet I
am not in front but I do not have the
claim to know where we are going
against what I know relatively
Well that’s what I’m going to present to you
today in 18 minutes is that not
badly of people from the authors of
illustrators of the directors have
proposed through the fiction of
think not so much about this tomorrow as we
can fantasize who ever really
achieve as we wanted but
rather in this way than tomorrow to
already to be active in the everyday and
it’s a bit like this kind of grid of
reading that I want to share with you
today on a theme that me
seems pretty interesting that she has
left matic dedicated or d intelligence
artificial that we will link back
with the theme of robots
the occurrence in science fiction he
there is a kind of course that will be done
between the 1920s and today and
which goes through several themes
several figures that go from the created robot
in 1926 until today but
like any lecture a bit intellectual
will start with a diagram 1
usually science fiction the
consider but I promise you that I
you take a few minutes
for that we consider it a
way of reading our future or of
describe our future this absurd you
know that when you take a novel
well you do not read at all the opinion of the
future or present or past but
you see an intrigue a
Fantasy and fictional organization
of events in which we readers
or spectator we will dive to experience
emotions
this is called the narrative in the
narrative of fiction what is enough
particular in science fiction
it is that these stories and all of you
we had seen
suppose in your life well they have
some weird links is that there is
robots in the real world
and then to robots in science
fiction there are cyborgs in the world
real there are cyborgs the science
fiction etc. until dia and we are
do as we are kneaded with these scenarios
we spend our time talking to each other about
future to review movies that did not see
avatar who did not see for maybe
you are not at all the films whose
I spoke but who did not see
bladerunner etc
and then all that we keep it because
the advantage of the fiction favor it
stories are we get them
appropriate and we experience emotions
the problem is that when we think about
future of humanity to the future of robots
odesia we have call did not do
actually interfere with the scenarios we have
in the lead and then finally the reality
researchers the researchers say
we do not do the
science fiction wishes life the
science fiction writers tell us
are not cool futurists
life but the problem is that the
citizens we all are there
not specialists in one or the other
have a good tendency to mix
but the difference is that in the
science fiction and the fictional title
the stipulates well actually the robot is
not first the engineer robot
all in all a little interesting in a
fictional scenario but it’s first
a metaphor and I remind you that the
metaphor maybe for some it’s
an old memory was not first
nice picture to write a letter
of love although I used this guy
picture when I was 18 years old who did not
not market but it’s first and foremost
way
the only way to describe realities
anthropological
in other words, how do you explain
love better than with the flame
in love the love flame is a
metaphor not see that it’s good it’s
not to look pretty but it expresses
something that is difficult to
to express differently at once is
fascinating
it attracts both it can be
repellent both his consume one al
feeling that one is going to die at the
it’s reinvigorating all those things
all these elements there are constitutive
of this metaphor just stupid flame
in love and that’s why
French philosopher named Paul
ricoeur said that the metaphor was the
only way we humans have
to re describe the world differently and
for them describes our relationship to the world
we can try to write differently
but the metaphor is a good way
it was a good way of a good
how there intelligence and human
or human sensitivity
able to create new images
new images to understand
the man and the world in which he lives
and that’s the reading that I’m telling you
offers today through a
pretty fast course obviously saw the
time allotted to me between robots
and the ja the robots you know
maybe this play if you
know it you’re unhappy because
it’s a bad play
it’s called and rushed writing for 1926
and an edition the first edition
English text of 1923 but written by
a Czech writer karel capek who
tells in this play in
rather classic scenario
today you are on an island a
factory we manufacture human beings
in it we just took away the soul
it’s practical it’s human without soul
are very good workers
except that one day helene young woman who
is who took pity on these
robots goes to the island seduces them
engineers it’s not very complicated
seduces the engineers and then forces a
engineers breathed soul into
these robots 1 and infuses them with soul
is suddenly what rivals do they
revolt and they revolt they
draw humanity the play
ends with the fact that the last
human says goodbye to the robots they
will recreate a world
obviously this scenario that soon has 100
years old today
we still have it in the newspapers when we
tells us that the ja’s are going
destroy humanity where robots go
maybe take precedence over the man
but it’s not a very recent thing or
to be at the forefront of progress but in
done that’s not the case and rushed on the
bed like that we will say to mr had capek
anticipated the questions that arise in
particular since the 60s 70
not at all because capek would understand
something very good thanks to his
brother by the way yosef is that the
robot word in Czech means the
worker where the slave the translation
the prostate is the most just would be the
proletarian because you know
this story of rer
when you build men in
a company in which you remove me
serve the seat of the identity of
individuality for them to build
the world
then you find the fight of the
Marxist classes in other words and street r
and not first in stories that speak of
robots there are no robots of
engineers in the 20’s but he
just talking about a metaphor
the story of a metaphor of an image
who
speaks of the condition of the proletarians
who are humans of ceret back of
first robots are humans of
flesh and bones but whoever is removed
individuality
in other words the first robots are
humans who are alienated by a
capitalist system manufactured by the
industrial system is unable to
to rebel except when they find
their soul and I remind you that his
marks in communism there is this
idea that proletarians must
raise awareness of their conditions for
then to be able to revolt is
to take precedence over the capitalists
this is the image of the robot that will be
still a huge success in the United States
the play is played 1921 in prague in 1922
in Paris then 1923 in the United States in
particular to new york that’s going to be
retrieved by popular magazines
american so-called pulp
magazines and in these magazines poles on
will transform these capek robots here
we in 1926 we will transform robots
from capek to be metal to the go the
American religions and the committees of
censorship on popular magazines
prevents the man from being able to recreate the
artificially life man can create
machines artificially but not
humans we will mechanized them
wheels and we know these mechanized robots
since we do not know all this
movie that happens in 1927 fritz lang
based on a novel by his wife thea von
harbou called metropolis which is
a syncretism years on the one hand history
of capek which is read by the tea von harbou
is reinterpreted by fritz lang
and then the American robot imagery
metallic android metal and
it’s the collusion of these two
imaginary there that appears to be or
source of m police who also
use the robot as a metaphor
not of the capitalist but of
perverse tendencies of the man we will not
To linger
the robot will undergo a fairly evolution
important Belgian love the sequence
amazing when the android seduces all
men a little bit in a room
but the drummers you know we
hear a lot about it since we
speaks of empathy among their beauties that
blade runner is a source reference to
this empathy yes since in this film
that’s the only way there is
to distinguish a robot from a human is
make him pass a test the test of
empathy in this case we massacre
animals in front of him in general and the
falandry robot of the not so much of
reaction while the months a little
scared by the thing and this test there
allows to distinguish the two except that
if you read that in terms realizes
you say ah well we could do in
so that one day robots by themselves
proof of empathy
no not simulated but lived outside philip
k.dick the author of bendtner we did not
really nothing to do robots which
realizes is that in the states
united from the 60s since the film is
adapted from a 1960s novel whose
united states of the 60s
we are doing with
a consumption system that is green
strongly criticized by the counterculture
to which belongs philip k.dick that
to make human beings no longer
of empathy between them otherwise in
the movie the drummers the replicants has the
American word replica nt much more
interesting that the word robot android
the replicants are humans like
you and me it’s just that they have
abandoned their empathic faculties and
philip k.dick use this metaphor
of the robot either to talk about
conditions of the proletariat but for
talk about a condition from the 60s – 70s
of the human being from the 60s – 70s who
loses his empathy by living in
a world simulate that the world of
consumption in which the other is
more than an object or an object of
consumption the occurrence if we read that
like that so suddenly the movie
becomes critical who becomes reflexive he
sends us an image of ourselves that
to say and you are able
empathy
because if you are able
of empathy then you are a human so
you are not capable of empathy
what distinguishes you from a
replicating the answer is nothing and that’s
obviously the same strategy that is
used by molière in his theater
is that if I realize that I
as a human I do not have anymore
empathy with my peers
so I can thanks to the movie it works the
mother of his manners either but I
thanks to the film realize that I
did not want to be this hard to be
human without empathy and so I can
start to change my behavior
that’s why molière sets up
learned women if I laugh women
scholars and I realize that this is
a woman that sleeps scholar so I can
change my behavior
it’s called catharsis it
not walk but let’s go it’s all
case like that it works at
condition that I see in the
replicants of metaphors and not the
real robots that would one day be able
or endowed with empathy to say that beings
humans does not happen which is enough
amazing is that this robot figure
1920 and 1970 wholesale 1982 for the film
scarlley scott’s blade runner is going to be
transformed by a new metaphor it
appears each time whose meaning
representations of new metaphors
the love flame
appears during the rebirth in
particular these delays it does exist
not before is no love flame
it’s the Greeks except in the versions
Americanized of the Trojan War that
are going on screens now but
otherwise you do not have that so there are some
images that appear from time to time
time that can re describe the world
in a novel little known but who
is at the source of the film matrix 15 years
before since it’s really a 1984
willem gibson an american author of
science fiction invents invents
create a plot in which beings
humans connects to a space that he
calls cyberspace and therefore become
iia or any case they are humans
first connect to networks
computer then who are going nicely
to be drugged to this computer system this
who both a little bit of both young people who
especially when they can no longer get
connect and then after a while
they even leave their human bodies to
become iia and there he duplicate himself to
infinity
obviously when they duplicate to
the infinity the problem is that they
lose their identity that’s a little bit the
problem when one is much we
resell it’s a novel that will be 84 which
had gone relatively unnoticed apart
in the field of science fiction and
which is nevertheless one of the metaphors the
more powerful to understand that
our still current condition of beings
humans for ever speaks
connected is something else
that can be read through the avatar movie
what’s funny is that when
Gibson writes the novel he sees two
kids play on the interest the atari 2600
or remember was not a lot of pixels
is not a lot of colors but he
said it’s weird those kids are
leaving their bodies for
to live in another world
and it is exactly this type of stuff out
that we see in avatar do not have a
green fable based on pocahontas that
you really have to read that to the first degree
a really plan-plan what’s it like
if you think that Mrs. Bovary has
really existed there is a problem
interpretation
but when a movie comes out in the years
2000 and that’s called avatar which is the
name means and not to talk about
Buddhist deities but to speak
first characters that we
represents in video games one gets
realize that avatar 2 comes in movie
is strong and who talks about the connection
of the machine in end of the man in
digital networks
I remind you that jake sully
disabled like all of us since we
we all have 3d glasses that we are
let’s see the movie sex is not disabled
paraplegic can become a kind of
weird and ugly doll that is
treated only in digital images to
the end of the movie they even leave his
frail body
to become pure this pure image
digital it’s the transition between a
actor let’s say a real picture a
actor profit milk the actor as he
is racette actors-there who become
pure digital image
that’s exactly what he was saying in
neuromancer when I leave my body
to become a pure avatar 1
I remind you that the pure avatar is
one of the fantasies of these movements
Americans called the
transhumanism today they
imagine that one day we will be able to applaud
our brains in servers
computer sas and the extremes but
there are still people they
think and who receive more money
that gibson for neuromancer what is
interesting with that is that of
new beds to 1 who is connected
to the machine the one who becomes in
computer software to do
simple is not at first a true
software that becomes software
IT is first the trend
weird urban to denigrate his body and
his pulpit permanently for this fantasy
and through computing otherwise
said
the explosion of time that we have today
on social networks is not the
that we are all victims
although we have always been victims
are not all fat victims
American boxes but maybe a
much broader phenomenon
postmodern who sees in humans
a deep rejection of his flesh in
neuromancer 84,15 the hero says I am
fell into my dear 1’s prison and
that I can free myself I can go out
of that i can invent myself davis i can
to become someone else
many other people
which is the best metaphor for
no longer having a body is to be who we
wants by duplicating that the ia or that the
computer software will find in
average better news than that
to be complicated two movies a little
critical and I will finish on that which
also shows how science fiction
will dig deeper into this theme with
scenarios each time particular
different so that we can appropriate
the metaphors weirdly ever read
his films as metaphorical movies
transcendence the movie where fans of
johnny depp are very happy since
is multiplied very often on full
so we see it everywhere like that
yes when you have this phrase game
creating the day when the technology depa
will be the man in a science movie
fiction what we realize
is that this sentence says today
technology has already overtaken man
why because in transcendence
you have a character who is a
scientist who crosses the stop
the importance of development
technological who is the victim of a
bombing good American movie requires and
who’s going to be claude and tell himself he’s going
see his consciousness integrate a network
computer and it will make him become
can we mission like that and then he goes
so obviously the fact that he has more
of human limits he has more than
carnal boundaries he’ll start doing
just about anything makes it to the
end what we realize they
realize this is just the utopia of his
woman but who also shows that there
is not talking about the
technological singularity or our
to come up
but of this kind of temptations and I
finds that the incredible display for that
or the human being is growing in
train metaphorically from those digitized
it’s not really but in its
ability to be permanently connected
to computer networks or even to
having entrusted the management of his life to
computer networks that makes that this
addiction that was spoken gibson
whose new novel is hers
already there try to imagine how at one
sinks all cell phones
for three weeks I was thinking of 2,3
of which – who will do a little bit of small
heart attacks
I will end up by guys maquis d’al know
not if you saw this movie and who
combines all that that combines robots
and the ex machina ja ckoi young woman
relatively pretty we never see
really completely except at the end we
sees that his face stays on two
robots that is a robot
but we mainly learn that celia
strong enough for her to
managed to fulfill to meet the test of
turing as soon as she can make sure
that a human being can be wrong about
the status to be granted to this robot we put
a guy who looks a little bit like
mark zuckerberg so a guy a little bit of
18 years old do not feel comfortable with
women who can only fall in love with
fact that falls in love of course
and then follows in a set of
adventures not very important but what
what happens is that in the end they
manage to get out of his reserve
we understand that the imprisoned tax she
out of that she puts her skin on her
she’s going out into the real world and we’re
is said but it’s still terrible
these machines that will take precedence over
humans
except that we have forgotten something
that it be this woman there before she
can put back his skin is only a
robot to people they
experiment and want to sleep
with it in other words what better
you are there for the instrument
sexual instrumentalisation and
to use someone on their own
profit than turning into a robot there
I hope in any case that these few
questions that rises quickly but
hope in any case that these films we
interest you can see them
and remember that if fiction is
interesting is because we have
metaphors that if the metaphors
are interesting is that it’s
the only ways we have today of
really reinventing our world so that
our world is unlike him
future human here I thank you for your
Warning
[Applause]
[Music]
Please follow and like us: