[Applause]
hello to all you are wondering
what makes the consistency of
organizing flows on a
territory
said like that it looks a little bit
abstract I you the rope so far
it’s something fundamental in
territorial organization and
flow organization is also
something fundamental and very
structuring on our lifestyles on our
modes of living on our modes of
move on our ways to consume on
our game modes you are etc
and to make that a little bit more
concrete I propose to imagine and
to try to visualize all
flow that we can have on a
given territory
then there are a number of flows
who are visible who are enough
obvious we have the displacements of
people for example who are a stream
ip restructuring in matter
territorial organization
but we also have material flows from
fluid building materials
flow flutes consumer goods
food that’s not all we
also energy flows
we have streams of drinking water
rainwater from wastewater we also have
waste streams on our territories
and then we also have flows
of information so try to
visualize all of these flows and
to imagine what it looks like on a
territory
it’s things that structure
enormously planning policies
and if we just try in a few
minutes of trying to characterize
the evolution of these flows over an era
recent
what can we see is that
basically in the history of humanity one
never had an acceleration too
powerful as extraordinary of
all of the flows that I incited on
all territories
so this is obviously a consequence
hyper important in urban planning
and then it has consequences too
fundamental to our lifestyles and on
our daily
the acceleration of these flows and
territorial organization
that’s what structured all
planning policies
since the second half of the twentieth
century with a development model
which was based on the speed of these
flow and on the organization of a network
corresponding to each of these streams I
caricature a little bit the story of
urban planning of the last decades but
it is to explain to you that
overall we had policies
development
in recent years that allowed a
programming an urban design
almost limitless
we had a huge facility imagined
a functioning with displacements
effective with urban services
around the water management around
waste management around the
management of our food by
example where our consumptions that was
almost limitless and so this model
of urban development
he still allowed us today
to acquire a certain comfort a comfort
almost unmatched of course and with
an increase and an acceleration
very strong of access to a certain
number of consumer goods from
access to a number of properties
access information a number
cultural content etc it’s a
number of foodstuffs by
example and access a number
space with always moving
faster and easier in terms
of territorial organization
in other words, at a glance
today in our territories
we have access to a lot of things we have
access to a lot of things and so that
there is a myth behind all this
who structured all of
planning policies since
many years so far this myth
it’s still important without
necessarily the totally deconstruct it
to bring some nuances
and then also some limits
we imagined structures and networks
to always go faster in matters
of displacement for example and for
as much on one of the most
structuring our everyday life
of displacements which are the
commuting
we’ve always seen for 20 years that
each of us on average spends more than
time to make this move to
moving from home to my house
workplace that we would speed up
enormously speed and efficiency
network transport networks
especially for this
speed she was mostly used to
access accentuate the distance between between
the workplace is the god of
home so that in fact
we go faster to go from home
self to his place of work
we always put so much time and
in fact more time today
than yesterday to go to his place of
job
so in fact the myth of two to have
technical progress that allows us
to have networks and flows on a
territory given that they are hyper
effective that are very fast
you have to bring a few
shading
there are other nuances behind this
Territorial organization is the fact
that technical progress allows us to
handle huge volumes of flows that this
either flows of movements or
energy flow or all other men
in networks that are always more
effective these networks they work
good
90% of the time and this organization
however, there is
still more and more than she is
not hyper resilient
as soon as there is a problem a problem no
known or not identified or not
to anticipate these networks it happens very
quickly to saturation and so with
consequences that often behind the
make it very very inefficient during a
some time we can think for example
networks to stormwater networks
we have for many years
organize stormwater management
with buried networks that we
allow wholesale
whenever a drop falls on
our territory that they are managed
in a pipe that brings him very quickly
either in a receiving medium or in
a sanitation plant
this network it works well in time
normal and the day of a rain 50
does not allocate an exceptional flood of a
powerful nal for example this network it
arrives completely at saturation and in
many territories
this phenomenon it is reinforced in addition by
the fact that this organization
territorial
she allowed a removal a
urban sprawl that makes today
that we have an artificialization of the soil
and a waterproofing of soils that
accelerated is who and who suddenly
made today that we have a certain
number of networks that are deficient
while theoretically they are hyper
effective to manage an urban service
who is the one to manage our waters
rain or our wastewater for example
so the myth of having networks
connected organized in which one can
put important volumes to a
very important speed
it has a number of limitations that
are already inherent even to this
organization
and then we have no other limits that are
not at all neutral it’s limits
environmental
we are in a finite world it was said
many times already today is so
this territorial organization and this
permanent acceleration of flows and
possibilities that it allows she has
long time was completely disconnected
because at some point these networks
and this organization has an impact
huge environmental then is this
that she is what he is tenable
is this urban development
is sustainable today there is a
number of models a certain
number of schools in urban planning
who tend to imagine something else
we also have and I do a little parallel
quickly on this on this organization
territorial
we also have and we are obliged to
to observe on all territories
a strong inequality a strong inequality
on this urban development ie
that comfort and organization
effective that we can have
towards this type of flow organization on
will find on a number of
territories and many territories
are going to be excluded you see
today
for a few days and a few
weeks the news is the turn of the
question of access to networks
telecommunications and we have a certain
number of territories in France that are
totally disconnected from something
which, on the other hand, benefit a certain
number of other territories in
speed of internet access for example
and we have another inequality that she
can end up on a territory that
for as much and connected and and who
benefit we’ll say that this
effective territorial organization in
theory it’s an inequality between
inhabitants today a person who
do not access transportation networks
and who does not have access to the same mobility
because our inhabitants on a territory
for reasons that can be
economic or other
today it has been identified as a
the main factors of exclusion
exclusion from research
working for example where a certain
number of other types of access
to housing etc
so today this model there it is
still largely re- interrogate one has
a movement around you have
certainly heard about
ecodistricts sustainable neighborhoods which
there is a whole semantics behind
refers to the idea of having a
more sustainable urban development it
there are a number of communities
who go even further and who
develop squarely concepts of
six cups the water for example there are some
networks is called quote that
allow to re-interrogate anyway
our relationship to time and the fact that
this permanent acceleration of
the flow organization in particular
flows of displacement does the
desirable in terms of living environment and
of lifestyle
for us being human with a capacity
limited also to be able to manage the
speed and then a number
other empty networks in transition and
that’s who allow it to point the
finger anyway on the character
sustainable and nabeul of this type
of territorial organization
so we have today a number
of school in design
urban or even urban programming
scale urban planning
large territory that rather than
continue to imagine a network always
bigger always more spread out which
enters into competition with another
network we have not talked about until
now what ecological network by
example with in terms of layout of the
territory
a green and blue frame that goes into
competition with infrastructures
that we build for networks that
make it possible to satisfy our needs
and then who comes into competition too
with urban sprawl the scattering
urban we have a number of schools
which advocates a reduction
rather than increasing the speed between
a point a and b to reduce the distance
between a point a and b and see to limit
a number of flows at a point a
and so it’s more flows it’s
only stocks here’s behind
all this there are a number of
paradigm
around them I invite you if you
want to deepen a little the subject the
urban metabolism to the economy
circular feature saving
applied to territories
but behind all that there is a principle
quite simple it’s how to scale
of a neighborhood we are able to be more
autonomous then take some examples
of two classical flow the flow of energy
for example who is today a lot
treated in everything called
smartcity network intelligence
the intelligence of the city we are
able today to create
neighborhoods that first reduce their
needs before imagining to create
flows have reduced these flows and then from
able to produce locally for
meet his needs
so with neighborhoods that are
almost autonomous from a point of view
have reduced the
heat needs and needs
of electricity two main needs in
terms of energy and then we produced
locally
something that ultimately allows
to avoid a huge network sometimes not
always so effective as that and with a
resilience that is much stronger
the issue of waste for example
that’s another pretty enough example
speaking we have today a volume of
waste we put it in our trash
that no matter the calf
in the blink of an eye it is collected and
then treated outside very often
agglomerations
so far in our trash we have a
third of organic waste that could
to be valued on the spot we have a part
waste that is bulky which
could be re-used on
place and benefit others and we have
like that all to his of a number
of flow inside the stream of dogs
we have several flows that could
themselves be treated very
local is very and so very
autonomous with neighborhood scale is
could take the same thing on the
questions of agriculture for example
the same thing on the issues of
moving water management with on
displacements for example today
many communities that
wonders about rather than creating
meet the needs of the in terms of
displacements to try to limit his
needs in terms of travel and
so rather than investing millions
in terms of infrastructure and
networks for that flows of cars and
always faster to try to
think about promoting forms of
telecommuting or coworking with
different spaces within the neighborhood
so you see that when we say all this
it involves in terms of design and
European programming when we
is working on an eco neighborhood by
example of thinking about equipment
which brings a different urban service
rather than sending all in tubes
and that it is often treated
outside and is quite far from
the place where the flow as years of
to be able to process it as much as possible
the scale of a neighborhood with most
time of the equipment a little hybrid
the cost of bringing
urban services so services
to work
differently from urban services for
to be able to move differently from
urban services to be able to manage
waste otherwise manage the water
differently manage energy
differently and with all that we can
imagine and so the demonstration she
and it is also related to the weft
green and blue that I talked about to
the time that the environmental impact
global and the preservation of a certain
number of two things today that
are factors of change hyper
structuring on our territories
preserving biodiversity
scarcity of resources change
climatic
we imagine that with this guy
planning and programming
urban
we are much more resilient we limit
much more the environmental impact
we have a hyper-powerful lever in term
of territorial organization
on the other hand, it is a total break through
relating to planning policies that
could be conducted either the heads of
large territories either on a neighborhood
yourself on a building or a lot to
build and sare questions quite a way
deep
our way of life
so here I invite you to follow this
which will certainly evolve very
quickly in the coming years
in urban programming and
and who will certainly answer in fact
a number of factors of
change that falls on us and on
which anyway urbanism is going
having to answer in terms of planning
public spaces for the development of
private and programming spaces
services / no thank you
[Applause]
hello to all you are wondering
what makes the consistency of
organizing flows on a
territory
said like that it looks a little bit
abstract I you the rope so far
it’s something fundamental in
territorial organization and
flow organization is also
something fundamental and very
structuring on our lifestyles on our
modes of living on our modes of
move on our ways to consume on
our game modes you are etc
and to make that a little bit more
concrete I propose to imagine and
to try to visualize all
flow that we can have on a
given territory
then there are a number of flows
who are visible who are enough
obvious we have the displacements of
people for example who are a stream
ip restructuring in matter
territorial organization
but we also have material flows from
fluid building materials
flow flutes consumer goods
food that’s not all we
also energy flows
we have streams of drinking water
rainwater from wastewater we also have
waste streams on our territories
and then we also have flows
of information so try to
visualize all of these flows and
to imagine what it looks like on a
territory
it’s things that structure
enormously planning policies
and if we just try in a few
minutes of trying to characterize
the evolution of these flows over an era
recent
what can we see is that
basically in the history of humanity one
never had an acceleration too
powerful as extraordinary of
all of the flows that I incited on
all territories
so this is obviously a consequence
hyper important in urban planning
and then it has consequences too
fundamental to our lifestyles and on
our daily
the acceleration of these flows and
territorial organization
that’s what structured all
planning policies
since the second half of the twentieth
century with a development model
which was based on the speed of these
flow and on the organization of a network
corresponding to each of these streams I
caricature a little bit the story of
urban planning of the last decades but
it is to explain to you that
overall we had policies
development
in recent years that allowed a
programming an urban design
almost limitless
we had a huge facility imagined
a functioning with displacements
effective with urban services
around the water management around
waste management around the
management of our food by
example where our consumptions that was
almost limitless and so this model
of urban development
he still allowed us today
to acquire a certain comfort a comfort
almost unmatched of course and with
an increase and an acceleration
very strong of access to a certain
number of consumer goods from
access to a number of properties
access information a number
cultural content etc it’s a
number of foodstuffs by
example and access a number
space with always moving
faster and easier in terms
of territorial organization
in other words, at a glance
today in our territories
we have access to a lot of things we have
access to a lot of things and so that
there is a myth behind all this
who structured all of
planning policies since
many years so far this myth
it’s still important without
necessarily the totally deconstruct it
to bring some nuances
and then also some limits
we imagined structures and networks
to always go faster in matters
of displacement for example and for
as much on one of the most
structuring our everyday life
of displacements which are the
commuting
we’ve always seen for 20 years that
each of us on average spends more than
time to make this move to
moving from home to my house
workplace that we would speed up
enormously speed and efficiency
network transport networks
especially for this
speed she was mostly used to
access accentuate the distance between between
the workplace is the god of
home so that in fact
we go faster to go from home
self to his place of work
we always put so much time and
in fact more time today
than yesterday to go to his place of
job
so in fact the myth of two to have
technical progress that allows us
to have networks and flows on a
territory given that they are hyper
effective that are very fast
you have to bring a few
shading
there are other nuances behind this
Territorial organization is the fact
that technical progress allows us to
handle huge volumes of flows that this
either flows of movements or
energy flow or all other men
in networks that are always more
effective these networks they work
good
90% of the time and this organization
however, there is
still more and more than she is
not hyper resilient
as soon as there is a problem a problem no
known or not identified or not
to anticipate these networks it happens very
quickly to saturation and so with
consequences that often behind the
make it very very inefficient during a
some time we can think for example
networks to stormwater networks
we have for many years
organize stormwater management
with buried networks that we
allow wholesale
whenever a drop falls on
our territory that they are managed
in a pipe that brings him very quickly
either in a receiving medium or in
a sanitation plant
this network it works well in time
normal and the day of a rain 50
does not allocate an exceptional flood of a
powerful nal for example this network it
arrives completely at saturation and in
many territories
this phenomenon it is reinforced in addition by
the fact that this organization
territorial
she allowed a removal a
urban sprawl that makes today
that we have an artificialization of the soil
and a waterproofing of soils that
accelerated is who and who suddenly
made today that we have a certain
number of networks that are deficient
while theoretically they are hyper
effective to manage an urban service
who is the one to manage our waters
rain or our wastewater for example
so the myth of having networks
connected organized in which one can
put important volumes to a
very important speed
it has a number of limitations that
are already inherent even to this
organization
and then we have no other limits that are
not at all neutral it’s limits
environmental
we are in a finite world it was said
many times already today is so
this territorial organization and this
permanent acceleration of flows and
possibilities that it allows she has
long time was completely disconnected
because at some point these networks
and this organization has an impact
huge environmental then is this
that she is what he is tenable
is this urban development
is sustainable today there is a
number of models a certain
number of schools in urban planning
who tend to imagine something else
we also have and I do a little parallel
quickly on this on this organization
territorial
we also have and we are obliged to
to observe on all territories
a strong inequality a strong inequality
on this urban development ie
that comfort and organization
effective that we can have
towards this type of flow organization on
will find on a number of
territories and many territories
are going to be excluded you see
today
for a few days and a few
weeks the news is the turn of the
question of access to networks
telecommunications and we have a certain
number of territories in France that are
totally disconnected from something
which, on the other hand, benefit a certain
number of other territories in
speed of internet access for example
and we have another inequality that she
can end up on a territory that
for as much and connected and and who
benefit we’ll say that this
effective territorial organization in
theory it’s an inequality between
inhabitants today a person who
do not access transportation networks
and who does not have access to the same mobility
because our inhabitants on a territory
for reasons that can be
economic or other
today it has been identified as a
the main factors of exclusion
exclusion from research
working for example where a certain
number of other types of access
to housing etc
so today this model there it is
still largely re- interrogate one has
a movement around you have
certainly heard about
ecodistricts sustainable neighborhoods which
there is a whole semantics behind
refers to the idea of having a
more sustainable urban development it
there are a number of communities
who go even further and who
develop squarely concepts of
six cups the water for example there are some
networks is called quote that
allow to re-interrogate anyway
our relationship to time and the fact that
this permanent acceleration of
the flow organization in particular
flows of displacement does the
desirable in terms of living environment and
of lifestyle
for us being human with a capacity
limited also to be able to manage the
speed and then a number
other empty networks in transition and
that’s who allow it to point the
finger anyway on the character
sustainable and nabeul of this type
of territorial organization
so we have today a number
of school in design
urban or even urban programming
scale urban planning
large territory that rather than
continue to imagine a network always
bigger always more spread out which
enters into competition with another
network we have not talked about until
now what ecological network by
example with in terms of layout of the
territory
a green and blue frame that goes into
competition with infrastructures
that we build for networks that
make it possible to satisfy our needs
and then who comes into competition too
with urban sprawl the scattering
urban we have a number of schools
which advocates a reduction
rather than increasing the speed between
a point a and b to reduce the distance
between a point a and b and see to limit
a number of flows at a point a
and so it’s more flows it’s
only stocks here’s behind
all this there are a number of
paradigm
around them I invite you if you
want to deepen a little the subject the
urban metabolism to the economy
circular feature saving
applied to territories
but behind all that there is a principle
quite simple it’s how to scale
of a neighborhood we are able to be more
autonomous then take some examples
of two classical flow the flow of energy
for example who is today a lot
treated in everything called
smartcity network intelligence
the intelligence of the city we are
able today to create
neighborhoods that first reduce their
needs before imagining to create
flows have reduced these flows and then from
able to produce locally for
meet his needs
so with neighborhoods that are
almost autonomous from a point of view
have reduced the
heat needs and needs
of electricity two main needs in
terms of energy and then we produced
locally
something that ultimately allows
to avoid a huge network sometimes not
always so effective as that and with a
resilience that is much stronger
the issue of waste for example
that’s another pretty enough example
speaking we have today a volume of
waste we put it in our trash
that no matter the calf
in the blink of an eye it is collected and
then treated outside very often
agglomerations
so far in our trash we have a
third of organic waste that could
to be valued on the spot we have a part
waste that is bulky which
could be re-used on
place and benefit others and we have
like that all to his of a number
of flow inside the stream of dogs
we have several flows that could
themselves be treated very
local is very and so very
autonomous with neighborhood scale is
could take the same thing on the
questions of agriculture for example
the same thing on the issues of
moving water management with on
displacements for example today
many communities that
wonders about rather than creating
meet the needs of the in terms of
displacements to try to limit his
needs in terms of travel and
so rather than investing millions
in terms of infrastructure and
networks for that flows of cars and
always faster to try to
think about promoting forms of
telecommuting or coworking with
different spaces within the neighborhood
so you see that when we say all this
it involves in terms of design and
European programming when we
is working on an eco neighborhood by
example of thinking about equipment
which brings a different urban service
rather than sending all in tubes
and that it is often treated
outside and is quite far from
the place where the flow as years of
to be able to process it as much as possible
the scale of a neighborhood with most
time of the equipment a little hybrid
the cost of bringing
urban services so services
to work
differently from urban services for
to be able to move differently from
urban services to be able to manage
waste otherwise manage the water
differently manage energy
differently and with all that we can
imagine and so the demonstration she
and it is also related to the weft
green and blue that I talked about to
the time that the environmental impact
global and the preservation of a certain
number of two things today that
are factors of change hyper
structuring on our territories
preserving biodiversity
scarcity of resources change
climatic
we imagine that with this guy
planning and programming
urban
we are much more resilient we limit
much more the environmental impact
we have a hyper-powerful lever in term
of territorial organization
on the other hand, it is a total break through
relating to planning policies that
could be conducted either the heads of
large territories either on a neighborhood
yourself on a building or a lot to
build and sare questions quite a way
deep
our way of life
so here I invite you to follow this
which will certainly evolve very
quickly in the coming years
in urban programming and
and who will certainly answer in fact
a number of factors of
change that falls on us and on
which anyway urbanism is going
having to answer in terms of planning
public spaces for the development of
private and programming spaces
services / no thank you
[Applause]
Please follow and like us: