this hat and this pen together
they cost one euro and ten if the hat
it costs one euro more than the pen
it costs the classic pen wondering this
from comitive reflection test which is a
test to understand how much one responds
instinctively as it stops at
think if you answered as I had
I answered 10 cents distinguished so it is
wrong and this go by instinct
without stopping to think it is clearly
the first huge problem of what it is
ignorance online we are all a bit
instinctive and we all reflect
but if one turns on social media on comments
of youtube on facebook comments on
various blogs around and we see an epidemic
ignorance ignorance that is not a
made not to know of the stuff or of
be less intelligent than another
is that and those ignorance tamarra e
those ignorance from ignorant shooting a
basketball and that Venetian ignorance
that does not pass the ball to those
ignorance that milan and we would say in iran
because in particular on the internet it spreads
this ignorance is a good point of
departure this book here the knowledge
in light I do not take a penny to report
I tell the books to the ignorant that
they comment thinking that I speak of one
book to sell it
I am not the daisy and the author the theory of
these gentlemen I agree with is
that we are all basically
ignorant most things
we do not have the least knowledge
in the vast majority of
objects we use we do not know how
a bathroom works from the point of view
own scientific physicist
we use the same for b is the aspect that
they point out is that an illusion of the
knowledge in some way there is
useful because christopher colombo if not
he had deluded himself to know exactly
where it was going then there would never be
went there to visit America premised
this that we are basically all
very ignorant and what an illusion of the
knowledge returns us in any case useful
Call me to understand why then this
rampant ignorance that goes beyond now
one aspect is this that the internet
amplifies having available the
knowledge does not mean having
knowledge is like saying if I’m near
with vin diesel or with vin diesel
24 a day for a month is not that
it became like bing diesel by osmosis
connected to this there is another fact
that from today you can look for anything
but the fact of having a fight
search does not mean you doing one
research is learning is like saying if I’m
looking for the tennis racket
in the closet it is not that he became a federer
while I’m looking for the racket I’m
simply rummaging in the closet of
same other motivation the so-called
dunning kruger effect many people yes
they overestimate because they do not know that
who do not know
look around online for attention
comments look around the posts and in the
status of the published there is a quantity
huge people who overestimate
thinks of knowing the topic but reality
he does not know he thinks he knows how
maybe use the platform but in reality
missing the bike in macro problem is often
that we do not know what is not
we know that they look like the little game of
words like the cornet perfection test if
think about it makes sense other aspect that
helps to spread ignorance online
and that you arrive with sacred values
for example, enter the comments of one
discussion not to have one
conversation but simply for
affirm what you already are
convinced and to find confirmations no
confirmation bay earth convince you
even more if the conversation is on
an aspect of principle there are no data
and information that takes an example
interesting about this was one
pew research center statistics
concerning gay marriage
in 2004, 60 percent of Americans
it was against gay marriages if willing
forward in 2015 instead 55 percent yes
he declared in favor why because the
conversation in these years it is
moved from an aspect of principle is
right and wrong to that instead
the benefits are the consequences
implications from a more instinctive part
and then there is no need to discuss
given on which I can convince you to
those that are aspects instead
much more practical and more practical
logical on which there can be one instead
conversation a comparison and then in
general there is a sort of marshmallow
you have the experiment in mind
that you put the baby in front of the dolcetto
on the 10th you immediately eat it all ready
they want to eat right away there is not
patience is the quick insult comment
so at least it makes you feel good the first
bitched and you can think of it disappeared
without thinking of the long term without
think that photo where you are
crazyly set disco flower
drunk the stuff of is also seen between
twenty years 30 years
I do not think about ignorance we see each other
once we look for that
instant gratification
in conclusion, we are all ignorant of who
more or less and we all have this
illusion of knowledge
but what we have simply
that its social networks there are many that
definitely take advantage of it
they cost one euro and ten if the hat
it costs one euro more than the pen
it costs the classic pen wondering this
from comitive reflection test which is a
test to understand how much one responds
instinctively as it stops at
think if you answered as I had
I answered 10 cents distinguished so it is
wrong and this go by instinct
without stopping to think it is clearly
the first huge problem of what it is
ignorance online we are all a bit
instinctive and we all reflect
but if one turns on social media on comments
of youtube on facebook comments on
various blogs around and we see an epidemic
ignorance ignorance that is not a
made not to know of the stuff or of
be less intelligent than another
is that and those ignorance tamarra e
those ignorance from ignorant shooting a
basketball and that Venetian ignorance
that does not pass the ball to those
ignorance that milan and we would say in iran
because in particular on the internet it spreads
this ignorance is a good point of
departure this book here the knowledge
in light I do not take a penny to report
I tell the books to the ignorant that
they comment thinking that I speak of one
book to sell it
I am not the daisy and the author the theory of
these gentlemen I agree with is
that we are all basically
ignorant most things
we do not have the least knowledge
in the vast majority of
objects we use we do not know how
a bathroom works from the point of view
own scientific physicist
we use the same for b is the aspect that
they point out is that an illusion of the
knowledge in some way there is
useful because christopher colombo if not
he had deluded himself to know exactly
where it was going then there would never be
went there to visit America premised
this that we are basically all
very ignorant and what an illusion of the
knowledge returns us in any case useful
Call me to understand why then this
rampant ignorance that goes beyond now
one aspect is this that the internet
amplifies having available the
knowledge does not mean having
knowledge is like saying if I’m near
with vin diesel or with vin diesel
24 a day for a month is not that
it became like bing diesel by osmosis
connected to this there is another fact
that from today you can look for anything
but the fact of having a fight
search does not mean you doing one
research is learning is like saying if I’m
looking for the tennis racket
in the closet it is not that he became a federer
while I’m looking for the racket I’m
simply rummaging in the closet of
same other motivation the so-called
dunning kruger effect many people yes
they overestimate because they do not know that
who do not know
look around online for attention
comments look around the posts and in the
status of the published there is a quantity
huge people who overestimate
thinks of knowing the topic but reality
he does not know he thinks he knows how
maybe use the platform but in reality
missing the bike in macro problem is often
that we do not know what is not
we know that they look like the little game of
words like the cornet perfection test if
think about it makes sense other aspect that
helps to spread ignorance online
and that you arrive with sacred values
for example, enter the comments of one
discussion not to have one
conversation but simply for
affirm what you already are
convinced and to find confirmations no
confirmation bay earth convince you
even more if the conversation is on
an aspect of principle there are no data
and information that takes an example
interesting about this was one
pew research center statistics
concerning gay marriage
in 2004, 60 percent of Americans
it was against gay marriages if willing
forward in 2015 instead 55 percent yes
he declared in favor why because the
conversation in these years it is
moved from an aspect of principle is
right and wrong to that instead
the benefits are the consequences
implications from a more instinctive part
and then there is no need to discuss
given on which I can convince you to
those that are aspects instead
much more practical and more practical
logical on which there can be one instead
conversation a comparison and then in
general there is a sort of marshmallow
you have the experiment in mind
that you put the baby in front of the dolcetto
on the 10th you immediately eat it all ready
they want to eat right away there is not
patience is the quick insult comment
so at least it makes you feel good the first
bitched and you can think of it disappeared
without thinking of the long term without
think that photo where you are
crazyly set disco flower
drunk the stuff of is also seen between
twenty years 30 years
I do not think about ignorance we see each other
once we look for that
instant gratification
in conclusion, we are all ignorant of who
more or less and we all have this
illusion of knowledge
but what we have simply
that its social networks there are many that
definitely take advantage of it
Please follow and like us: