how to unmask bullshit
karl saganne of which I have never read
I do not reproach myself for a kind of
toolkit to unmask bullshit
lists some principles to follow for
to avoid being entangled then me
seven are eight, they seemed interesting
core names how many are we see them together
after the initials on the bridge waving
white flag on the point if you own
we must understand, however, the first principle
is to rely on facts
independent example if I tell you
Look, I’ve been doing the last three years
more than 300 million views on
facebook a thing like that can be
a sensational vaccination or it may be true
in this case it is true and what is the
confirm as independent as it should
look for the facts in that case
let me see Facebook insights with
that data or one you put there does the
calculation of all the displays of the
video and arrive at the set result
independent council number two of the
old karl is to have a
debate with competent people with
different points of view on
that example topic had a friend
in high school that was the phenomenon of women
of boarding and what one
have to sleep with a young lady who
other than he had never been to
read with a young lady and we talked
according to a whole vision of the world
theoretical face to have a confrontation with
people who have a true competence and
who see the problem so many points
view is certainly a third aid
useful principle is that of authority
often we fall on this in practice
if something is said by
an authority is not said to be true that
it is the fact that trump and tell
something as he is president of the
United States does not mean that
stuff is true and applies to any
political obviously for any one
authority
other principle is to try
several hypotheses do a lot of testing
another principle is that of not
fall in love with a theory only
because croix and this is important it
we see on the projects all fall in love with
a project because you
you did the train Saturday instead
to question that theory that
It’s so dear to you that it’s useful if you do not
you’ll do someone else your place
so much so to the principle of the chain of
arguments if to get to one
conclusion there are a series of
logical steps concatenated between them
each of these steps to be
true occurred at the other end
saganne recalls the so-called fallible
smoke we operate said in terms
horribilis the principle of popper e
what a theory to be
scientific or not must be
falsifiable for example of saga nor
that of the dragon I tell you comes home
mine and I’ll show you the dragon
cv arrivals and nothing at all eh no
because the invisible and visible dragon
but then wait let’s put them down
something and the sand so we see them
footprints and no you can not because the dragon
besides being invisible and also flying
so how do we understand if I’m
dragon exists or not we do one of the
ics rays that look at the heat and no
because it’s a cold-blooded dragon pro
you understand every two minutes or change the cards
My table is not falsified on the table
theory and therefore it is not scientific and with
this explanation 3 on the exam and note
Log on to know how to write so carlo
saga but here these were some
principles then there are others go to
see, however, it seems useful to me to look
always to train to develop a little
of critical thought
it’s not easy and try to unmask them
bullshit because it’s not easy because it will be
gun rightly points out that people
in most cases yes
they fall in love with what makes them feel
well instead of falling in love with what
it’s right
karl saganne of which I have never read
I do not reproach myself for a kind of
toolkit to unmask bullshit
lists some principles to follow for
to avoid being entangled then me
seven are eight, they seemed interesting
core names how many are we see them together
after the initials on the bridge waving
white flag on the point if you own
we must understand, however, the first principle
is to rely on facts
independent example if I tell you
Look, I’ve been doing the last three years
more than 300 million views on
facebook a thing like that can be
a sensational vaccination or it may be true
in this case it is true and what is the
confirm as independent as it should
look for the facts in that case
let me see Facebook insights with
that data or one you put there does the
calculation of all the displays of the
video and arrive at the set result
independent council number two of the
old karl is to have a
debate with competent people with
different points of view on
that example topic had a friend
in high school that was the phenomenon of women
of boarding and what one
have to sleep with a young lady who
other than he had never been to
read with a young lady and we talked
according to a whole vision of the world
theoretical face to have a confrontation with
people who have a true competence and
who see the problem so many points
view is certainly a third aid
useful principle is that of authority
often we fall on this in practice
if something is said by
an authority is not said to be true that
it is the fact that trump and tell
something as he is president of the
United States does not mean that
stuff is true and applies to any
political obviously for any one
authority
other principle is to try
several hypotheses do a lot of testing
another principle is that of not
fall in love with a theory only
because croix and this is important it
we see on the projects all fall in love with
a project because you
you did the train Saturday instead
to question that theory that
It’s so dear to you that it’s useful if you do not
you’ll do someone else your place
so much so to the principle of the chain of
arguments if to get to one
conclusion there are a series of
logical steps concatenated between them
each of these steps to be
true occurred at the other end
saganne recalls the so-called fallible
smoke we operate said in terms
horribilis the principle of popper e
what a theory to be
scientific or not must be
falsifiable for example of saga nor
that of the dragon I tell you comes home
mine and I’ll show you the dragon
cv arrivals and nothing at all eh no
because the invisible and visible dragon
but then wait let’s put them down
something and the sand so we see them
footprints and no you can not because the dragon
besides being invisible and also flying
so how do we understand if I’m
dragon exists or not we do one of the
ics rays that look at the heat and no
because it’s a cold-blooded dragon pro
you understand every two minutes or change the cards
My table is not falsified on the table
theory and therefore it is not scientific and with
this explanation 3 on the exam and note
Log on to know how to write so carlo
saga but here these were some
principles then there are others go to
see, however, it seems useful to me to look
always to train to develop a little
of critical thought
it’s not easy and try to unmask them
bullshit because it’s not easy because it will be
gun rightly points out that people
in most cases yes
they fall in love with what makes them feel
well instead of falling in love with what
it’s right
Please follow and like us: