
a millionaire of votes this is the estimate
how many votes he would have brought
the opera endorsement operates the famous
American hostess endorsement given
obama the 2008 presidential campaign
where she said vote for obama
here is a millionaire of votes this is
the impact of a true celebrity then one
can absolutely discuss how many
votes in more 20 votes less but is di
fact that a celebrity a person of
great success of great fame has the
possibility of moving votes or moving
people to buy products or services
and it has always been so today still of
the more I felt gary vainer jacques give the
exact date of how much wheat asks
kendall jenner the model to make a
post on his instagram profile a
million 320 almost 80 million fans of
follower can be a great one
investment right now but
the very high amount if you think about it
why what celebrity does it sell to
end of the accounts because if we think about it
the use of famous characters in the
communication exploded from the 70s in
then people like magazine gave a little the
turning point
putting from time to time on the cover
the face of a famous person of the
moment according to their parameters e
always from the 70s onwards the first ones
polaroid advertising that starts to use
the testimonials and so on, I’ll tell you how many
until today just in jack but alibaba
that uses kevin spacey for singles
tay James Bond to introduce his veins
because then if not the famous there
it influences so much a first aspect
is that it is very personal and relative there
I’ll give you a shaved example I went into
sweden to play ping pong train
in a club that was also called large
it was the place where the adults were
Swedish masters who at that time
dominated the world at one point I was
there I was training and shooting on one
ball I see the green in front of you
that at the time it was like saying tower was god
aberg rebels trembled my legs for
a hair game in pong a for green is
mister nobody and does not have any kind of
influence for one and play a few in
that moment he preferred instead was
fundamental is always very relative
it depends if it’s famous for you other
aspect that a professor of
sociology is called chris roy and that is
that of replacing the
divinity essentially with a decline
historical so
drama of religions celebrity
goes to fill that gap in the
divinity divinity however much more
close to us of a normal gene because
one confesses there is this so-called
culture of the confessional today as well as today
celebrities are told
in the new intimacy with all the
reality phenomenon all the interviews
that go to the bottom and then we hear them
closer and closer to us third
interesting motivation is that which
from karen ribbon or anything else is not that
there is a motivation that explains everything
what explains these influences of who it is
famous about us, however, there are many
many side ideas that says dear nasa
he says we need this
we all have extraordinary things
need to contact us
something extraordinary even if only
for a moment not just something that
you pull us up to make us feel fuller
of life has more meaning and the
contact the celebrity with this
Being an imaginary eco is something that
for a moment he makes us feel
extraordinary our time is the last one
appearance connected and helps us understand
this strange relationship is that
described in 1956 or late 60s by
orthone wall two psychologists who have
identified this so-called illusion
of intimacy and the effect that everyone
we tried when we meet
someone of famous of the seems to me
know him never seen so many times
in a film he saw him singing the east
pharma sport when you see it live you
seems to know why why yes
this intimacy is created but it is a
intimacy at a distance and with celebrities
this is the key
we have a feeling of intimacy
very strong that leads us to buy a
vote to have crazy reactions
because for us it is a real intimacy
when instead it is only an illusion
how many votes he would have brought
the opera endorsement operates the famous
American hostess endorsement given
obama the 2008 presidential campaign
where she said vote for obama
here is a millionaire of votes this is
the impact of a true celebrity then one
can absolutely discuss how many
votes in more 20 votes less but is di
fact that a celebrity a person of
great success of great fame has the
possibility of moving votes or moving
people to buy products or services
and it has always been so today still of
the more I felt gary vainer jacques give the
exact date of how much wheat asks
kendall jenner the model to make a
post on his instagram profile a
million 320 almost 80 million fans of
follower can be a great one
investment right now but
the very high amount if you think about it
why what celebrity does it sell to
end of the accounts because if we think about it
the use of famous characters in the
communication exploded from the 70s in
then people like magazine gave a little the
turning point
putting from time to time on the cover
the face of a famous person of the
moment according to their parameters e
always from the 70s onwards the first ones
polaroid advertising that starts to use
the testimonials and so on, I’ll tell you how many
until today just in jack but alibaba
that uses kevin spacey for singles
tay James Bond to introduce his veins
because then if not the famous there
it influences so much a first aspect
is that it is very personal and relative there
I’ll give you a shaved example I went into
sweden to play ping pong train
in a club that was also called large
it was the place where the adults were
Swedish masters who at that time
dominated the world at one point I was
there I was training and shooting on one
ball I see the green in front of you
that at the time it was like saying tower was god
aberg rebels trembled my legs for
a hair game in pong a for green is
mister nobody and does not have any kind of
influence for one and play a few in
that moment he preferred instead was
fundamental is always very relative
it depends if it’s famous for you other
aspect that a professor of
sociology is called chris roy and that is
that of replacing the
divinity essentially with a decline
historical so
drama of religions celebrity
goes to fill that gap in the
divinity divinity however much more
close to us of a normal gene because
one confesses there is this so-called
culture of the confessional today as well as today
celebrities are told
in the new intimacy with all the
reality phenomenon all the interviews
that go to the bottom and then we hear them
closer and closer to us third
interesting motivation is that which
from karen ribbon or anything else is not that
there is a motivation that explains everything
what explains these influences of who it is
famous about us, however, there are many
many side ideas that says dear nasa
he says we need this
we all have extraordinary things
need to contact us
something extraordinary even if only
for a moment not just something that
you pull us up to make us feel fuller
of life has more meaning and the
contact the celebrity with this
Being an imaginary eco is something that
for a moment he makes us feel
extraordinary our time is the last one
appearance connected and helps us understand
this strange relationship is that
described in 1956 or late 60s by
orthone wall two psychologists who have
identified this so-called illusion
of intimacy and the effect that everyone
we tried when we meet
someone of famous of the seems to me
know him never seen so many times
in a film he saw him singing the east
pharma sport when you see it live you
seems to know why why yes
this intimacy is created but it is a
intimacy at a distance and with celebrities
this is the key
we have a feeling of intimacy
very strong that leads us to buy a
vote to have crazy reactions
because for us it is a real intimacy
when instead it is only an illusion
Please follow and like us: