Press "Enter" to skip to content

How game theory can help solve pollution problems | Moses Mayer | TEDxJIS


[Applause]

I’ve live in Indonesia my entire life

and what I have come to realize is that

Indonesia faces a severe pollution

problem not only the numerous vehicles

populate the streets of Jakarta does

creating air pollution but the general

quality of water and water raised such

as rivers is also very poor I have

always wondered why is it that we are

still unable to solve this problem after

all in this modern era there is just so

much to Tammi done so recently I have

started doing research on this issue and

while working on the topic of game

theory I discovered the length between

the two my name is Moses and today I am

here to talk about how game theory can

be used to tackle enemy shows Persian

crisis so what exactly is game theory

game theory is defined as the study of

mathematical models of conflict and

cooperation between intelligent rational

decision makers in other words it

studies how rationally thinking parties

modify their actions in order to obtain

the highest possible payoffs or rewards

to themselves game theory has been used

in many subjects such as economics

political science and Floss psychology

and even has applications in logic

computer science and biology to further

illustrate the concept of conflict and

cooperation I’d like to play a game that

although is very basic is widely

referenced in the field this game is

called the prisoner’s dilemma the

scenario is as follows

you and an accomplice of yours have been

convicted of a crime but are offered a

chance at Salvation the two of you are

placed in separate rooms with no means

of contacting each other if both of you

stay silent you’ll both be held for

further questioning but then be allowed

to walk free and split the or earnings

between the two of you if you testify

against your accomplice

you will get to walk free and keep all

the money to yourself while he faces a

five-year sentence but if the two of you

decide to testify against each other

that not only will the money be

confiscated but both of you will earn a

two-year sentence so what do you do at

first glance it may seem that a

selective group the best possible option

would be for both of you to stay silent

because no one would be sentenced if

both of you testify against each other

not only will you not get the money but

now both of you face a sentence but if

you choose to stay silent then there is

the risk that your accomplice testifies

against you and if that happens you face

a five-year sentence and he gets all the

money so what do you do it is game such

as this one where one faces a dilemma as

to whether to cooperate or strive for

their own benefit that forms the basis

of many of game theory theories

questions operate and put your faith in

the other player while simultaneously

risking your own loss or do you strive

for your own benefit and make sure that

you will not lose more than the other

player does anyways on to what I came

here to talk about using game theory for

pollution we all know that pollution has

become much worse in Indonesia over the

past few years Indonesia is now home to

two of the world’s most polluted places

namely Kalimantan and a chattering River

located 40 miles east of Jakarta these

two places are just examples of how

industry in Indonesia has caused air and

water pollution the chattering River in

particular has suffered due to the Swift

unmonitored growth of the textile

industry and the number of factories

that are located alongside the river

these factories release their chemical

wastes into the water thus contaminating

it with heavy metals such as mercury

along with domestic waste from the local

folk who live alongside the river the

terrorem has become the world’s most

polluted river and has affected local

folk who rely on it as a source of water

in the form of diseases likewise

pollution has become rampant in

Indonesia with the capital Jakarta

becoming the 43rd most polluted city in

the entire world this is mainly due to

the subpar quality of public services in

Korea which incentivizes many people to

go to work using their own vehicles

along with the number of factories and

power plants that burn fossil fuels and

release air pollution in environment and

also the burning of trash in order to

dispose of it and the clearing of forest

land through the use of deliberate fires

in other parts of Indonesia air

pollution has become much worse in

Indonesia than where it was 20 years ago

and back in 2015 I’m sure many of you

would remember that there was a giant

haze that spread drops Vatra climb on

top and even to neighboring countries

such as Singapore and Malaysia so for my

own research I have decided to model two

games one for the issue of air pollution

and one for the issue of water pollution

but before I am able to actually create

models for the games I must first decide

the players in each game which are the

parties capable of modifying the

outcomes of the game based on what they

choose to do I must also decide the

motives of each of the players and the

strategies available to them and also

the effects of playing certain

strategies on the outcome of the game

after some deliberation I’ve decided

that the government would be a major

player in both the game for air

pollution and for water pollution I have

also decided to include this group of

industrial firms as a single player for

the sake of simplicity and for the game

for water clean air pollution I’ve also

decided to include the general

population as a player now for the

motives of each player for the purposes

of analysis the assumed main goal of the

government is to regulate the levels of

pollution and environment such that it

creates a good quality of life for the

citizens but also minimize costs at the

same time if there’s too much pollution

in the government in any environment

then not only would it affect the

population it means such as sicknesses

but it could also create worsen the

image of the country to neighboring

countries if it’s if the pollution

spreads such as what had happened back

in 2015 but then if they increase the

cost then the government would be

steering more towards a budget deficit

and could put them in more depth

likewise for the firm’s

the zoom main goal is to minimize the

cost deface in order to get the most

profit now for the sake of simplicity we

will assume that the firm’s are all only

interested in their own game and thus

they will not be doing any strategies

just for altruistic motives such as

trying to be responsible for him store

the environment and lastly for the

population the assumed main goal is also

to minimize costs to face now after

deciding the players in each game and

the strategies that each player has we

are able to create functions that

modeled the total cost faced by each

these functions each involves several

variables each of which will be affected

by a change in the other for example for

the function for government the involved

variables are the cost for cleaning up

the cost for healthcare and their legal

cost gathers required to impose laws and

files also other firms now notice that

by changing one of these the others will

also extremely change thus adding

another layer of complexity to the game

for example if the government chooses to

increase the cost they spend for

speeding up the environment then there

would mean that there is less pollution

in an environment and as a result less

people would fall sick due to pollution

this means that they would not have to

provide as much for public health care

services which reduces their costs for

health care and now even though they

have had to spend more towards feeding

up but then they have been able to

experience a greater decrease in the

cost for health care thus resulting in

an overall overall cost increase

now notice that in both games the

government is the most powerful player

as they decide what to do in terms of

like the laws and fines that they want

to impose and also how much they want to

contribute towards cleaning up the

environment so they could say for

example of make firms responsible for

contributing more towards king of the

environment although this means that the

government will minimize the costs they

risk backlash from the shareholders of

firms as now the firm’s would have to

spend more money this could result in

the political image of the government

declining so now the government faces a

dilemma as to whether to increase the

cost he spent towards cleaning up and

face no risk of backlash or spend less

towards cleaning up the environment but

then in turn experience a more backlash

and even the risk of political

instability and in major cases a

possible revolt so like in the

prisoner’s dilemma we have the same

exact dilemma now spend less and improve

your political image spend wearing

improve your political image or spend

less but then worsen political image now

this game such as this one and models

where we realize that we can not use

mathematics to solve models but also

approach them from a game theoretic

perspective like what we have been

discussing so far the game theoretic

perspective allows us to consider every

single possibility

thus understanding the effects of

changing your strategies it takes an

account the idea of rational rational

decision-making and thus although it may

not be suited for decisions that must be

made in a short time it allows us to

understand every single consequence of

whatever we do based on what other

players – hence the beautiful process

now let’s look at an example of game

that involves three of three previously

mentioned players

the government the firm’s and a

population if the government decides to

play now notice that each of these

strategies can be divided into two

groups ones where the player does not

have to spend money and ones where the

player has to spend more money

also notice that doing nothing is in

fact a legitimate strategy for each of

the players and could in fact be the

best possible strategy now for example

say the government decides to play the

second and third strategies that they

have which involves increasing their

costs but improving public services and

cleaning up the environment then

although the costs have increased they

would get more public support because

not only do firms have to pay less for

collusion now but then the population is

also able to enjoy better public

services and also like the friends would

as friends are less responsible then

this means that the shareholders or

firms would also possibly rally in

support of the government but thus

improving the government’s chances at

being reelected and also increasing

their improving their political image

likewise for the firms they have the

option of spending money in order to

decrease the effects of pollution that

they impose in environment this is done

do research and development or by

installing filters now although this

increases their cost and also makes it

so that they have to expend a effort in

order to maintain the environments but

then this means that there will be less

pollution in the environment and so this

could lead to less of their employees

fall sick and because less employees are

falling sick this means that the

employees will be coming to work more

does improving productivity which in

turn will increase their profits game

theory and mathematics aren’t just

subjects that we study in school to

improve our GPA their applications

crossed the boundaries of just

theoretical concepts to realize

situations even those were mathematics

and game theory just does not even seem

to be related so the next time you’re

sitting in a classroom listening to a

math lecture

I implore you to realize that what

you’re listening to is forms the basis

of many of the world’s most critical

decisions thank you for your time [Applause]

Please follow and like us: