when people and hear about the topic of robots
then many
but why are we talking about this already here and
now about some kind of their regulation at the level of
and moral legal norms, we do not
see any in our streets not to our houses
above the houses of such clever robots and
state regulation is always
hinders innovation
even those robots that ride down the street
Instead of it they are not yet so smart
My goal in this speech will make you
to think that there are still some
questions that you should consider with
now because later it will be too late
either because these decisions will be taken
somewhere on the sidelines
and while the society is not yet ready
not ready for a legal unethical sense 3
arrival robots and machines well, let’s start
a little from afar
can some of you have heard of
ethical such a thinker experiments
experiments it is called
trolley problem what it means rides
The trolley and its impossible to stop
if she continues her way right then
she will kill 5 people to death
they will not have time to hide, but there is
another possibility
You can rotate this trolley to
a spare way but as you can see there too
one person and he too will not have time to
and so is the problem of the trolley
will make us weigh the price tag
human life and ask and decide
either kill a person or 1
especially if you add some details to the
this case
for example, and te5 are children and this one
80-year-old scientist who is very close to
to find a cure for cancer
While such questions in real
life arise for example drown 5 children and
You can graze then save only one thing
This is not the situation on which we used to
somehow they could think or pay off
because such situations are impossible
anticipate
but with the transition of robots especially unmanned
cars it all changes because
already now it is absolutely clear that
the car can be simply programmed
so that she does
certain solution
this thought experiment
Well, already and not this kind of thinking it
programmed eg google
calls
death algorithms can for example
book a car in this way
that if the child on the road and roll up
you can not go anywhere so that the car would prefer
always child
anyone who is in the car or into it but here
only not the question is what
or some solution must be well
who should take this decision if
It is not a producer , is it also
such as a car owner or
user can such a solution
change for example every morning based on
mood or still this decision
must accept states for sure
We do not have an unambiguous answer, we do not know
What is the correct response, the
But in order for society to be
the arrival of robots is important that this
the question generally arose further consider
Another argument that uses those
who say that talking about robots
it is too early and it is a waste of time
something that should remain on the pages
fiction
this argument of communication with what it is
consciousness or self-awareness, or
that we still can not scientific
language to describe what it is consciousness
it’s just that what we feel and what
we feel and know as a person that she has
We have when discussing the topic can
car think
refer to the 10 thuring machine will pass
A test can deceive a person that
ipt a person can not understand what
communicates with artificial intelligence but
as you already understand it only proves
that the machine can deceive
imitate a man but not that a machine
really my track and still scientists so far
Do not know if it will ever be possible
Create a car with the feelings of your self and
consciousness and so it follows from this
this argument is hurricane opponents cool
talking about robots is that but
then the car will never be so
like a human machine it’s simple
thing why should we talk about robots
reality is not consciousness
the premise that we have already gone
about the robots talk again we’ll start
a little from afar and
[applause]
and discuss some issues if cruel
with all the force to throw a laptop into the wall
then we will not be as sympathetic
this broken device, then maybe
we’ll think it’s all right with that
man who did this but we will not
think felt this laptop floor
because we know this is not possible in
points of view
lawyers
this is only a thing and the owner can
destroy in some way in the points
view of lawyers is also an animal that’s almost
as things but even the most cave lawyers
understand that the animal is not ordinary
she feels pain and therefore
The state has adopted a number of laws to
animals to protect and so if never
there will be a machine that feels pain
Then probably strong it is necessary somehow
we will think of an additional
further because sometimes we protect and
the so -called public nerve and
action prohibit which and directly
no one is harmed for example we are not
we permit walks in the nude for
city center
this is a violation of the public
order
even if it does not harm anyone physically
arguably on the principle
that we are not particularly enthusiastic when we walk
The city and we meet to meet naked
people and so are there any questions
connected by robots
when we want to learn to write some
public good or interest or
the social nerve I will give you two
example
Imagine a robot he is very she
very similar to a person directly so that
bought verzile can not be different then the person
how did you feel
If the owner could do anything with it
to abort her
piece
shoot it all on video and then
sell for example on the Internet probably
here in this situation I will already affect
the public nervously needs so much
think about the state
intervention or for example when we have
there is a robot
which can bring society and
probably a great benefit for example
very close to having to find
a cure for cancer and its owner
envies and wants to destroy him
And the earth and then for example this robot
to protect so that probably all the same is
some questions are related to robots
when we wanted to appear to feel and we
how humanity can not tolerate everything
You are bound only some
very difficult questions and do not solve it
problems of news opportunities completely
New kind and creativity for example new
species
for example if you let the robot read
sometime in the future all works 2
tal of the 100th
the robot after under warming from
read would write his own
product and can also such that
when we read it we can not understand it
that it is not written by a man but of course
While we still do not have such a smart robot
who could write something comparable
with world classics of literature
But we already have examples of how
somehow robot analyze scripts
He writes his film script
the first such is called sans bank he was
on the songs of 2016 and of course he
entertaining say that writers
Ryuti should not be afraid of competition yet
he is not very good but you took it off
you can also see it on youtube here
But if the robot created something positive
then this one and of course the scenario too
for example, many questions who specifically
is the author and someone
Oscar when this scenario wins but
too, more serious problems and issues
this is a responsibility
when the robot from the table is something negative and
problems of the bird’s principle
for example we protect part 100 piece
inst of the person and prohibit incitement to
calls to violence and it burns through strife
so what if the robot does it
We have one example already there is an interlocutor
microsoft by the name of the shadow he troits you in
twitter and when I missed this kind of the same
interacted with twitter users and
Developed but users twitter not
were polite when they communicated with
and microsoft
was forced to turn off the interlocutor through
16 hours because the robot began to post
Russian insulting comments from
On the one hand, it is clear that microsoft and
there was no desire for someone
insult and probably when you are condemned
for such an action it was not not
It is fair if anyone condemns the Cossacks
someone when he let so something for
malice
but on the other hand it is clear that it is unlikely
society to accept that we will not
to punish such a creator is completely here
you can bring a parallel to animals and
of the host host
act of his animal with one
we do not equate the situation
when a dog bites someone’s situation
when the owner of someone is a pack of forces, but it’s understandable
that the owner is responsible for the animal
when she did some harm and so
these questions are pretty much and understandable
that they relate to each of us and
humanity as a whole is not a question of
which we can look for answers sometime
then we can not allow the situation
when the answers to these questions will be sought
and chili
or else the skin lawyers are alone and this
because for sure then these decisions
will take for example technological giants
or other interest groups and these
solutions will only be those who
they fit it
The rest of society simply
remains to be accepted thanks
[applause]
[music]
then many
but why are we talking about this already here and
now about some kind of their regulation at the level of
and moral legal norms, we do not
see any in our streets not to our houses
above the houses of such clever robots and
state regulation is always
hinders innovation
even those robots that ride down the street
Instead of it they are not yet so smart
My goal in this speech will make you
to think that there are still some
questions that you should consider with
now because later it will be too late
either because these decisions will be taken
somewhere on the sidelines
and while the society is not yet ready
not ready for a legal unethical sense 3
arrival robots and machines well, let’s start
a little from afar
can some of you have heard of
ethical such a thinker experiments
experiments it is called
trolley problem what it means rides
The trolley and its impossible to stop
if she continues her way right then
she will kill 5 people to death
they will not have time to hide, but there is
another possibility
You can rotate this trolley to
a spare way but as you can see there too
one person and he too will not have time to
and so is the problem of the trolley
will make us weigh the price tag
human life and ask and decide
either kill a person or 1
especially if you add some details to the
this case
for example, and te5 are children and this one
80-year-old scientist who is very close to
to find a cure for cancer
While such questions in real
life arise for example drown 5 children and
You can graze then save only one thing
This is not the situation on which we used to
somehow they could think or pay off
because such situations are impossible
anticipate
but with the transition of robots especially unmanned
cars it all changes because
already now it is absolutely clear that
the car can be simply programmed
so that she does
certain solution
this thought experiment
Well, already and not this kind of thinking it
programmed eg google
calls
death algorithms can for example
book a car in this way
that if the child on the road and roll up
you can not go anywhere so that the car would prefer
always child
anyone who is in the car or into it but here
only not the question is what
or some solution must be well
who should take this decision if
It is not a producer , is it also
such as a car owner or
user can such a solution
change for example every morning based on
mood or still this decision
must accept states for sure
We do not have an unambiguous answer, we do not know
What is the correct response, the
But in order for society to be
the arrival of robots is important that this
the question generally arose further consider
Another argument that uses those
who say that talking about robots
it is too early and it is a waste of time
something that should remain on the pages
fiction
this argument of communication with what it is
consciousness or self-awareness, or
that we still can not scientific
language to describe what it is consciousness
it’s just that what we feel and what
we feel and know as a person that she has
We have when discussing the topic can
car think
refer to the 10 thuring machine will pass
A test can deceive a person that
ipt a person can not understand what
communicates with artificial intelligence but
as you already understand it only proves
that the machine can deceive
imitate a man but not that a machine
really my track and still scientists so far
Do not know if it will ever be possible
Create a car with the feelings of your self and
consciousness and so it follows from this
this argument is hurricane opponents cool
talking about robots is that but
then the car will never be so
like a human machine it’s simple
thing why should we talk about robots
reality is not consciousness
the premise that we have already gone
about the robots talk again we’ll start
a little from afar and
[applause]
and discuss some issues if cruel
with all the force to throw a laptop into the wall
then we will not be as sympathetic
this broken device, then maybe
we’ll think it’s all right with that
man who did this but we will not
think felt this laptop floor
because we know this is not possible in
points of view
lawyers
this is only a thing and the owner can
destroy in some way in the points
view of lawyers is also an animal that’s almost
as things but even the most cave lawyers
understand that the animal is not ordinary
she feels pain and therefore
The state has adopted a number of laws to
animals to protect and so if never
there will be a machine that feels pain
Then probably strong it is necessary somehow
we will think of an additional
further because sometimes we protect and
the so -called public nerve and
action prohibit which and directly
no one is harmed for example we are not
we permit walks in the nude for
city center
this is a violation of the public
order
even if it does not harm anyone physically
arguably on the principle
that we are not particularly enthusiastic when we walk
The city and we meet to meet naked
people and so are there any questions
connected by robots
when we want to learn to write some
public good or interest or
the social nerve I will give you two
example
Imagine a robot he is very she
very similar to a person directly so that
bought verzile can not be different then the person
how did you feel
If the owner could do anything with it
to abort her
piece
shoot it all on video and then
sell for example on the Internet probably
here in this situation I will already affect
the public nervously needs so much
think about the state
intervention or for example when we have
there is a robot
which can bring society and
probably a great benefit for example
very close to having to find
a cure for cancer and its owner
envies and wants to destroy him
And the earth and then for example this robot
to protect so that probably all the same is
some questions are related to robots
when we wanted to appear to feel and we
how humanity can not tolerate everything
You are bound only some
very difficult questions and do not solve it
problems of news opportunities completely
New kind and creativity for example new
species
for example if you let the robot read
sometime in the future all works 2
tal of the 100th
the robot after under warming from
read would write his own
product and can also such that
when we read it we can not understand it
that it is not written by a man but of course
While we still do not have such a smart robot
who could write something comparable
with world classics of literature
But we already have examples of how
somehow robot analyze scripts
He writes his film script
the first such is called sans bank he was
on the songs of 2016 and of course he
entertaining say that writers
Ryuti should not be afraid of competition yet
he is not very good but you took it off
you can also see it on youtube here
But if the robot created something positive
then this one and of course the scenario too
for example, many questions who specifically
is the author and someone
Oscar when this scenario wins but
too, more serious problems and issues
this is a responsibility
when the robot from the table is something negative and
problems of the bird’s principle
for example we protect part 100 piece
inst of the person and prohibit incitement to
calls to violence and it burns through strife
so what if the robot does it
We have one example already there is an interlocutor
microsoft by the name of the shadow he troits you in
twitter and when I missed this kind of the same
interacted with twitter users and
Developed but users twitter not
were polite when they communicated with
and microsoft
was forced to turn off the interlocutor through
16 hours because the robot began to post
Russian insulting comments from
On the one hand, it is clear that microsoft and
there was no desire for someone
insult and probably when you are condemned
for such an action it was not not
It is fair if anyone condemns the Cossacks
someone when he let so something for
malice
but on the other hand it is clear that it is unlikely
society to accept that we will not
to punish such a creator is completely here
you can bring a parallel to animals and
of the host host
act of his animal with one
we do not equate the situation
when a dog bites someone’s situation
when the owner of someone is a pack of forces, but it’s understandable
that the owner is responsible for the animal
when she did some harm and so
these questions are pretty much and understandable
that they relate to each of us and
humanity as a whole is not a question of
which we can look for answers sometime
then we can not allow the situation
when the answers to these questions will be sought
and chili
or else the skin lawyers are alone and this
because for sure then these decisions
will take for example technological giants
or other interest groups and these
solutions will only be those who
they fit it
The rest of society simply
remains to be accepted thanks
[applause]
[music]
Please follow and like us: