[applause]
Hello
greetings to all
present
my name is Pavel
jumps I’m a candidate
theatrical arts
A critic and although it is not
quite the format ted but I
in advance
I familiarized here with
report by Vyacheslav and
presenting all these
complexities
you will encounter when
perception of this
text we with
organizers
decided to precede it
some introductory
in a word very shortly
I will try to give you
general structure
forthcoming
speech as well as in
give some
key terms
designate
semantic series and
problem field and so
speaking of the structure we
we can distinguish three
main parts and
these are the following questions
question about
plastic language
boundaries and conditions
corporal
sayings
development problem
metalanguage
modern shares
low practices and
also the paradox
correlations
dietary projections
with categories
plastic text
chronotope structure
here we naturally
refer to works
charles for the Fillmore a & m
this is fox well and how
said John in
Chinese philosopher
fourth century BC
AD era trap
need when catching a hare
when the hare is caught
the trap is forgotten well, I
I think you understand about
than there is a speech that that
concerns the basic
terms and
definitions well in the first
turn it
plastic and
choreographic
terms but on them we
we will not
stop at
principle, I think they
you all know well and
so that ‘s probably
main main
the problem will be
basic term
which can cause
problems are
out-of-body
corporeality in our
case he
is understood as
concept
constituting in
context
traditional
dichotomy internally and
outwardly and protruding
antipodes of the internal
boundaries of physicality well
and correspondingly
including such
phenomena as a way out of
body and out-of-body
experience all this seems
is sufficient
complicated
actually
functions on
a fairly simple i
would even say the layman
level in this
You can see if
look at the graph
as a matter of fact two
axis
axis of abscissas and axis
ordinates given in
our case as
syntagmatic and
flax and axes paradigm
meanings
accordingly here
we are interested in
of course these are these points
we intersect them
we call a the centers and
they establish
tell them
are denoted by the following
points y this connection x
this link is right here
conglomerate of communication it
he is quite complex
is denoted as sex
communication . mida two strokes
up to 1 st of them are marked 2
You can connect in this
see further on
there is another sex
communication and that’s
please pay
attention is this
difficult moment
a.a. xt by these three
points
as a matter of fact
signifies that we
call o
classical loop
in this way
strictly speaking
this is this one
The schedule already introduces us
and he enters
specific
atonal rhythm
communication connection
semi communication 2 links
semi connection loop i
I hope you understand
but I can repeat
communication connection with the floor
connection 2 connection floor
loop connection
connection with the floor connection 2
connection semi-bond with
a loop
so i kats
obvious but at the very
you can still do all this
and evidence base
for this let
I still have a series of schemes and
charts which
general then this
pattern
we confirm
here’s an example here
Graph 2
scheme 1 but at the very
we are very long at
this is not
stop
because about this
you can find out in
scientific publications
scientific journals
this is enough
well, actually
speaking to me it seems
that this
regularity can be
illustrate and
more visually
eg
multimedia
content and me
please pay
attention once again on
screen
well how
quite clearly
seen from the static
motion image video
dance performance and
lacquer us sound recordings
audibly
audiovisual
image of perception
the recipient is born
not immediately
overcomes
certain
stylistic
The difficulties here we
as a matter of fact
we can see first hand
make sure that care
presumptions
body value is not
may be
the result
methods that
the
interdisciplinary
research
problems the same time
it is the study of
what is not
classical
plastic act
communication and
divergence and what
his public role
is the essence
proposed by us
approach here in this
this situation
quote the classics
overcoming
positivist
trends in issues
congruency
ratio
individual and
group movement sky
therapy and enough for and
audience perception
recipient
suggests
consideration of the people
actively Faclinov
donative
concurrency
subordinate
dynamics
intermediate
presumptions
artistic
security stamp well,
in general can we
perceive actions
visible on the plane
scrap screen
motionless as
full
action or
very necessary
the motion of matter for
form
of this
fine
rhythmic act
change
chaotic
movement causes
interference and I would say
day and rural
exaltation
in all this we
naturally
are influenced
the image of a twin
image of another
Perhaps we will give the floor
this image
plastic theater
appears on
historical field in
moment of loss
immunity
truth
statements and
devaluation of any
kind of blurted wali
written or
only
thought-out words
generative
dominant interest in
corporeality spontaneously
interested
art took
content
postulate
inability of anyone
whatever it was about
subject matter is new
description thank you
here the only
I want to note and
add from all
the foregoing
it follows that any
kind of linguistic
forms are aimed at
officially not
subject
verbal description
phenomena
undergo
to all
pragmatic
ridicule and undoubtedly
that each
subsequent
what is said in this
the direction of the word
will only distort
and discredit
the very essence of the
the nature of
utterances all
more and more
aggravate
inaccuracy and absurdity
zero object
excuse me, please
there is a question on
refinement
please
saying you
repeatedly
led to
body and in
connection with this
clarify
How do you rate
methodological
potential
the theme of corporality in
modern
theatrical peace theme
Maybe you
find
its main
can be straight
radial may be
performat nai dal
Yes, I can answer
this question but before
than to talk about
methodologies
we should
determine the
philosophical
background by all
philosophical
directions
which we take for
base with our
reflection
further
agree is important
will it
phenomenology or
hermeneutics or we
will use
categorical
apparatus
structuralism and
poststructuralism and
of course here
It is worth considering this
the fact that
subsequent development
German
classical
idealism
as you know from Fichte
and hegel she
determines the installation
cant and
rethinks kiev
as a relationship or
even more precisely would say
as a link or as I would
to this evil bond 2
connection semi-bond with
loop I hope I
answered your question
tell me if you can still
question well, sorry for
your logic
it turns out that this
subjective factor
is an
defining the boundaries
social
space in
which it operates
the question is clear
understandable but I again
I ask you to draw
attention to something
saying that
cited some
time ago
utterance
the great Chinese
philosopher jones and how
it seems to me already in it
there is a response to
set by you
a question only
listen to the trap
need when catching a hare
when the hare is caught
the trap is forgotten by you
feel with it
communication connection communication
slept
there are 2 floor connections
link loop I can
repeat communication link
with semi communication 2 connections
semi loop connection
once again communication link with
semi communication 2 connection well
listen to what we are
here with you this
a long time
said and you do not
catch the connection to me
seem
here everything was already there
said the micro-level
linked to a macro
communication connection floor communication
without communication turned out
loop connection link with
semi communication without communication
semi loop connection
bunch communication connection
loop slept connection
safety for color
take snow ball conversation
hitching loop dirt
I’m using a mixture
communication conversation conversation
half-death loop
link with the way down.
link bond
here
having given
no
behold
no
behold
[applause]
[applause]
[music]
[music]
or
[music]
and
[music]
[music]
[music]
[music]
[music]
[music]
[applause]
Hello
greetings to all
present
my name is Pavel
jumps I’m a candidate
theatrical arts
A critic and although it is not
quite the format ted but I
in advance
I familiarized here with
report by Vyacheslav and
presenting all these
complexities
you will encounter when
perception of this
text we with
organizers
decided to precede it
some introductory
in a word very shortly
I will try to give you
general structure
forthcoming
speech as well as in
give some
key terms
designate
semantic series and
problem field and so
speaking of the structure we
we can distinguish three
main parts and
these are the following questions
question about
plastic language
boundaries and conditions
corporal
sayings
development problem
metalanguage
modern shares
low practices and
also the paradox
correlations
dietary projections
with categories
plastic text
chronotope structure
here we naturally
refer to works
charles for the Fillmore a & m
this is fox well and how
said John in
Chinese philosopher
fourth century BC
AD era trap
need when catching a hare
when the hare is caught
the trap is forgotten well, I
I think you understand about
than there is a speech that that
concerns the basic
terms and
definitions well in the first
turn it
plastic and
choreographic
terms but on them we
we will not
stop at
principle, I think they
you all know well and
so that ‘s probably
main main
the problem will be
basic term
which can cause
problems are
out-of-body
corporeality in our
case he
is understood as
concept
constituting in
context
traditional
dichotomy internally and
outwardly and protruding
antipodes of the internal
boundaries of physicality well
and correspondingly
including such
phenomena as a way out of
body and out-of-body
experience all this seems
is sufficient
complicated
actually
functions on
a fairly simple i
would even say the layman
level in this
You can see if
look at the graph
as a matter of fact two
axis
axis of abscissas and axis
ordinates given in
our case as
syntagmatic and
flax and axes paradigm
meanings
accordingly here
we are interested in
of course these are these points
we intersect them
we call a the centers and
they establish
tell them
are denoted by the following
points y this connection x
this link is right here
conglomerate of communication it
he is quite complex
is denoted as sex
communication . mida two strokes
up to 1 st of them are marked 2
You can connect in this
see further on
there is another sex
communication and that’s
please pay
attention is this
difficult moment
a.a. xt by these three
points
as a matter of fact
signifies that we
call o
classical loop
in this way
strictly speaking
this is this one
The schedule already introduces us
and he enters
specific
atonal rhythm
communication connection
semi communication 2 links
semi connection loop i
I hope you understand
but I can repeat
communication connection with the floor
connection 2 connection floor
loop connection
connection with the floor connection 2
connection semi-bond with
a loop
so i kats
obvious but at the very
you can still do all this
and evidence base
for this let
I still have a series of schemes and
charts which
general then this
pattern
we confirm
here’s an example here
Graph 2
scheme 1 but at the very
we are very long at
this is not
stop
because about this
you can find out in
scientific publications
scientific journals
this is enough
well, actually
speaking to me it seems
that this
regularity can be
illustrate and
more visually
eg
multimedia
content and me
please pay
attention once again on
screen
well how
quite clearly
seen from the static
motion image video
dance performance and
lacquer us sound recordings
audibly
audiovisual
image of perception
the recipient is born
not immediately
overcomes
certain
stylistic
The difficulties here we
as a matter of fact
we can see first hand
make sure that care
presumptions
body value is not
may be
the result
methods that
the
interdisciplinary
research
problems the same time
it is the study of
what is not
classical
plastic act
communication and
divergence and what
his public role
is the essence
proposed by us
approach here in this
this situation
quote the classics
overcoming
positivist
trends in issues
congruency
ratio
individual and
group movement sky
therapy and enough for and
audience perception
recipient
suggests
consideration of the people
actively Faclinov
donative
concurrency
subordinate
dynamics
intermediate
presumptions
artistic
security stamp well,
in general can we
perceive actions
visible on the plane
scrap screen
motionless as
full
action or
very necessary
the motion of matter for
form
of this
fine
rhythmic act
change
chaotic
movement causes
interference and I would say
day and rural
exaltation
in all this we
naturally
are influenced
the image of a twin
image of another
Perhaps we will give the floor
this image
plastic theater
appears on
historical field in
moment of loss
immunity
truth
statements and
devaluation of any
kind of blurted wali
written or
only
thought-out words
generative
dominant interest in
corporeality spontaneously
interested
art took
content
postulate
inability of anyone
whatever it was about
subject matter is new
description thank you
here the only
I want to note and
add from all
the foregoing
it follows that any
kind of linguistic
forms are aimed at
officially not
subject
verbal description
phenomena
undergo
to all
pragmatic
ridicule and undoubtedly
that each
subsequent
what is said in this
the direction of the word
will only distort
and discredit
the very essence of the
the nature of
utterances all
more and more
aggravate
inaccuracy and absurdity
zero object
excuse me, please
there is a question on
refinement
please
saying you
repeatedly
led to
body and in
connection with this
clarify
How do you rate
methodological
potential
the theme of corporality in
modern
theatrical peace theme
Maybe you
find
its main
can be straight
radial may be
performat nai dal
Yes, I can answer
this question but before
than to talk about
methodologies
we should
determine the
philosophical
background by all
philosophical
directions
which we take for
base with our
reflection
further
agree is important
will it
phenomenology or
hermeneutics or we
will use
categorical
apparatus
structuralism and
poststructuralism and
of course here
It is worth considering this
the fact that
subsequent development
German
classical
idealism
as you know from Fichte
and hegel she
determines the installation
cant and
rethinks kiev
as a relationship or
even more precisely would say
as a link or as I would
to this evil bond 2
connection semi-bond with
loop I hope I
answered your question
tell me if you can still
question well, sorry for
your logic
it turns out that this
subjective factor
is an
defining the boundaries
social
space in
which it operates
the question is clear
understandable but I again
I ask you to draw
attention to something
saying that
cited some
time ago
utterance
the great Chinese
philosopher jones and how
it seems to me already in it
there is a response to
set by you
a question only
listen to the trap
need when catching a hare
when the hare is caught
the trap is forgotten by you
feel with it
communication connection communication
slept
there are 2 floor connections
link loop I can
repeat communication link
with semi communication 2 connections
semi loop connection
once again communication link with
semi communication 2 connection well
listen to what we are
here with you this
a long time
said and you do not
catch the connection to me
seem
here everything was already there
said the micro-level
linked to a macro
communication connection floor communication
without communication turned out
loop connection link with
semi communication without communication
semi loop connection
bunch communication connection
loop slept connection
safety for color
take snow ball conversation
hitching loop dirt
I’m using a mixture
communication conversation conversation
half-death loop
link with the way down.
link bond
here
having given
no
behold
no
behold
[applause]
[applause]
[music]
[music]
or
[music]
and
[music]
[music]
[music]
[music]
[music]
[music]
[applause]
Please follow and like us: