Press "Enter" to skip to content

You’re an Artist, Just Express Yourself | Shahzain Khan | TEDxAlYasminaAcademy


what’s the point

that’s a question I heard in a museum

once and it kind of stuck with me this

entire talk will be a response to that

one question so lady in the green

sweatshirt National Museum of London

this one’s for you what is the point

art really is a cornerstone of human

civilization it’s part of what makes us

human and I often hear people talking

about robots and sentience and these

discussions they always end on the fact

that a robot can gain sentience because

it can’t feel you can’t teach a robot

emotion they’re beyond description

they’re singular in that they are just

that emotion and I think this is really

what art is an attempt to create so

let’s move on to the real crux of what

I’m talking about there’s this French

painter that really fascinates me his

name is Rene Francois Aslam agree and

one of his most famous works it’s called

the treachery of images now there it is

on the slide there and while all you

just shout out one word that you think

of when you see this painting pipe

surrealism there as well so this is a

painting of a pipe on a canvas and

underneath the pipe is written this is

not a pipe in French and at first it’s

easier to see this and think this is

another one of those pretentious art

house pieces that’s minimalistic for no

reason but actually it isn’t as the

young lady pointed out this is one of

the most easily accessible pieces of

modern surrealist art in the world right

now I think what’s so great about this

picture is that it comes as a really

meta artistic idea the idea of

representation so what I love about this

is that it’s a painting that really

confronts you it literally asks you a

question and it makes you question it

it’s like a really big dude it’s a big

painting it’s 25 inches by 35 inches

it’s on a big canvas it’s like a really

big guy coming up to you and saying this

is not a pipe but is that enough so

let’s go back to on the great

philosophical minds of our era lady in

the green sweatshirt the National Museum

of London who said but like what’s the

point let’s answer that question I think

this meaning is all about art it’s about

how art makes you ask questions and it’s

how a single

image can have and hold innumerable

meanings um the act of painting a pipe

on a canvas and saying this is not a

pipe on it wasn’t to be pretentious it’s

to really show that art is

representative and it’s really quite

literal this isn’t a pipe just like the

Mona Lisa isn’t a real person it’s a

representation of a pipe but why is that

important well because that’s the

baseline of anything artistic these

representations these expressions will

ultimately inform and what people will

look back at on past societies and

civilizations so that’s one of the

really important things about this piece

it’s pure creativity imagination thought

emotion is creation it’s a sleepless

night it’s a shower thought it’s a

fleeting idea poured onto a canvas and

isn’t it beautiful and that’s maybe what

brings up the glory point that are

grateful I’ll saw philosophical was

talking about so if you want to

understand the importance of

self-expression you have to look at the

people who created the act of creating

something I believe is inherently

selfish because all the greatest works

of art really impact people and take the

selfishness from the artists point of

view I think to think that they have

this unique perspective that will

actually impact people and it also

highlights this symbiotic relationship

that exists between the artists and the

consumers of art art can’t be effective

it can’t be worth anything unless it

affects people and us as consumers of

art need to be willing to let it into

our lives and not be quick to dismiss it

and that dismissal of new perspective is

what leads to ignorance at its core

that’s what art is not ignorant but a

new perspective

similarly there seems to be one of the

main things that drives artists artists

forward is discussion and debate and

that’s kind of lacking I think in lorne

society debate and discussion on a piece

of art not only encourages people to

express their own thoughts and opinions

but also encourages new ideas and

perspectives to flourish and also

highlights this sort of cyclical nature

that exists between art and the artist

and that’s another thing that’s great

about this painting we’re an art

inspires art and the most obvious

examples of this that I can talk about

is music if you look back at how modern

musicians were inspired by people that

lay listen to you when they grew up and

how

channeled their sound you can even look

back at the rock-and-roll movement of

the 50s 60s and 70s and how bands like

Led Zeppelin and the WHO and the Rolling

Stones were inspired by blues musicians

like Chuck Berry and Muddy Waters those

people listen to the blues musicians and

what they were doing and they were

really inspired by them and they evolved

on their sound and in turn inspired a

whole new generation of musicians that

cycle really just keeps repeating on and

on and on

I keep repeating the term

self-expression and I think that’s

because there really is no substitute

that better encompasses what I’m trying

to say art is self-expression and all

that means is that it’s a form of

creative output we as people express

ourselves every day we say how we feel

if we like something if we don’t like

something we tell people and we do this

through language and we do through

emotion and that the crux of any form of

creative output is a broader concept

being expressed through an

unconventional medium and all

unconventional is to say is that it’s

not directly expressed a little bit like

this is not a pipe it’s telling you

something but truly this is the most

effective way of expressing yourself

because if I have a point to make and I

tell people at that point is sure

they’ll listen but I can only keep them

interested for so long my reach is

limited as a human being that kind of

sounds ironic saying think what I’m

doing right now but we’ll go with it

yeah but if I transfer that concept the

idea to a medium that has a potential

stand the test of time and isn’t limited

by my reach as a human being I am

empowering the idea it becomes bigger

than me or any one person and why would

you not want to do that it’s my real

question maybe that also makes part of

the point so one thing that really

stagnant and restricts our means for

artistic expression is prejudice

prejudice against artistic mediums you

can look at developing art forms and

some have this stigma in them that the

art created within them is inherently

artistic and isn’t valued as highly as

other mediums and what this does is it

creates this dismissal of new

perspective that I’m talking about and

what happens is these newly developing

art forms they don’t have the ability to

grow into something that people can

actually respect and the people that

work within them or then they aren’t

able to create more at the base than

they should and when you approach these

mediums in this way with this mindset of

prejudice

you’re really dismissing these new

experiences and perspective

that the the art form has to offer and

the beauty of hat but that’s okay that

there’s nothing wrong with that the

beauty of having these different forms

of creative output is that it gives you

as a consumer of art the choice you can

like things and you can not like things

so that’s fine the problem lies when

people don’t respect the creative

process to say or imply that that

artistic medium has no artistic merit is

a disrespect everyone that works within

that medium and everyone who’s found

married within pieces in that medium and

that again least that dismissal of new

perspective and is ultimately bad for us

as a society

so in exceptionally great New York Times

article I read the other day these two

novelists Thomas Malin and Pankaj Mishra

discussed whether there was such a thing

as low and highbrow art terms I’m sure

you’ve all heard before I won’t spoil

what they concluded but I will tell you

what I think I don’t really believe in

the terms low and highbrow art I’m one

of those people that really thinks art

is just what you make it the problem I

think with these rigid definitions of

art is that really it’s such a personal

concept and the emotion that I or you

get out of any piece of art is solely

individual to you or me and it can’t be

shared with anyone else so really who is

any one person to say that one piece is

more effective than another or any piece

of art in a city to be successful really

is affect someone anyone doesn’t matter

so now article Thomas Malin points out

that according to Wikipedia the term

highbrow was popularized by will Owen

who’s reporter for the Sun magazine and

he popularized it in 1902 let’s talk a

bit about will or when he was an

interesting guy he thought that people

who were really intelligent had really

big foreheads so you can really see the

absurdity of that term my problem with

these distinctions is that it’s really a

platform for artistic elitism and

prejudice to thrive there’s a notion

that consumers of lowbrow art don’t look

at fiber art because they don’t

understand it it’s too much for their

feeble brains to comprehend but highbrow

consumers will often look at low growl

or to get a better understanding of

what’s influencing the Vox Populi and

just to see and inspire themselves

because you know they’re above all of us

I think Alexander Hudson the Russian

writer put it best when he said art is

not at ease

the stiff over neat thrifty house of the

petite bourgeoisie see our know about

you guys we’re just saying that’s made

me kind of Angry but what do I know I

don’t have a Wikipedia page and

Alexander Herzen has a very very very

long one so simply put I’m not a fan of

these strict definitions of good or bad

art that’s not to say I’m gonna compare

a drawing done by a child with Crayola

Crayons to a DaVinci portrayed technical

skill can be measured I’m not going to

salute that but it never guarantees

emotional impact it doesn’t matter how

masterfully you execute your painting

piece of music film sculpture doesn’t

matter it will never guarantee that

people actually get emotion out of it

there has to be that emotional crux that

influences it I’d like to end with a

quote by Stephen Fry he said a true

thing poorly expressed is a lie and that

really captures the essence of any

artistic endeavor you know the process

of finding a truth and trying to express

that and whether the truth is expressed

effectively is really down to you all as

consumers of art you get to choose that

and I’d like to add on to that that any

idea that isn’t expressed is wasted so

I’d like to urge all you to go out there

put that pen to paper be more active

consumers of art be more active creative

of art and always ask what is the point

but when you do note that the only

person who can answer that and who owes

and you an answer to that is yourself

thank you

[Applause] [Music]

Please follow and like us: