Press "Enter" to skip to content

Why we might be Instinctively Good, even if our Ideas are Bad | Simon Piasecki | TEDxUoChester


it’s not a cliche to say that we’ve

saturated these days by predominance of

bad news whether it’s war natural

disaster or terrorism and of course it’s

it’s immediate the technology these days

means that we have a rolling update of

this bad news every day for 24 hours so

everything that we see and hear seems to

feel like it’s bad but whilst the

immediacy and the connectivity of that

bad news is a new thing the phenomenon

of bad news isn’t a new thing at all

when I was 12 I joined CND because of a

daily fear of the dread of imminent

nuclear war when I was an undergraduate

student I was coming down a highway in

Scotland with my girlfriend and her

mother into Lockerbie as as the plane

hit which was a deeply traumatic

experience I grew up with bomb scares

and bombs and like many of you I’ve got

friends and family that have been far

too close to many recent events so we’d

be forgiven for feeling more and more

depressed about the fact of all this bad

news so what I want to do today is

actually to try and give you a little

bit more of a positive positive aspect

and maybe to ask whether whether we’re

looking at that footage in quite the

right way so want you first and foremost

to come with me on a bit of a time

machine the end of the Soviet Union and

fall of the Berlin Wall and in spring

1991 I’m coming to the end of my first

teaching in my career in Germany and the

East Germans have been given gruesome

gulps which is greeting money it’s about

a hundred marks of which they can come

and experience the West’s ridiculous

idea like the West is some kind of sweet

shop and I’m on my way home so I’m at

Reiner station near the Dutch border and

coming down into an underpass and I

encounter a man lying on the floor in a

state of distress he’s bloody he’s got

broken ribs he’s beaten up and he’s got

no shoes and a couple of station

officials are trying to lift him off the

ground to get him out of the underpass

and I asked them who is and they say

he’s an East German which is amazing to

me and he’s been beaten up by West

German Jews who resented the idea of

reunification and the impact of that on

their standard of living possibly on

their jobs and so they’re taking his

trainers because trainers as we all know

are an absolute symbol of Western

consumerist power and they also took his

money so I fished out of my pocket the

last hundred marks that I had because I

budgeted for it then I tried to press

these upon him and he wouldn’t accept

them at first and we had a bit of a

conversation and then finally he did

accept the money and he embraced me and

I remember that time Stood Still in that

moment because what you’ve got to

remember is that I’d never met anybody

from the Soviet Union before I’d grown

up in the Cold War my name is PA zetsu

key but at that point it wasn’t my

father had anglicized his name as a

young man and so we went by a very

English name which was max dead and I

knew no difference at that point but as

I sat on the train them in the ferry

home I felt bewildered and I felt a kind

of seismic shift in my sense of the

other and over the next 10 years I began

to realize that I didn’t know whether my

grandfather who was a Polish airman I

had had any family at all because he

died in 1944 so I started to look for

family I started to research this my

father got on board and first and

foremost we found veterans that know my

grandfather which was amazing we had

Ministry of Defence searches for papers

I got the International Red Cross onto a

search for him as well and around about

1997 they said that they discovered that

my grandfather had a sister called

Veronica ogorodnik that was her married

name and but she lived in Ukraine but

unfortunately as the Soviet Union fell

so all the addresses changed and they

couldn’t trace an address for him and he

came to 2000 and by this point I was

established as a performance artist and

I was lucky enough to be invited to the

third international

the value of experimental art in st.

Petersburg Russia which was a really big

thing for me it was really a really big

deal and whilst I was there one of the

things I did was I made a five hour

performance which was called underground

that the Winter Palace and it really

dealt with my frustrations it was a

collaboration with an artist and it

dealt with my frustrations at this

severed family because of the Cold War

and afterwards a Russian artist called

Vladimir your book took offered to help

me find the family which I found really

unlikely Ukraine is a vast space and

it’s got millions of people but I

thanked him and two weeks later he rang

me up and he said Simon excuse max and

he said yes my mother knows your

grandfather’s sister and this was

miraculous but actually it turned out to

be true so two months later I took my

father to Ukraine and the family was

reunited as you see there which was just

an incredible moment but at that point

what happened was a complete collapse of

my sense of identity because I’d grown

up in the Cold War and suddenly I was

with family in Ukraine and it wasn’t

that that collapse that I suffered it in

some way actually it fascinated me

particularly as an artist and I started

to explore it through different source

of work and pretty soon that turned into

a PhD project for me as well a PhD

project that considered the shifts in

our identity in the constructs of

identity which was antagonizing the idea

of nationality because I realized that

my identity ran well beyond that for

example and so I was also interested in

the journey because I realized that my

grandfather had escaped from Poland on

foot through forests and over mountains

at night he’d been caught in Romania and

put in a camp he escaped I don’t think

it was that well guarded he made it all

the way to the Mediterranean and then

via Marseilles through France to Britain

where he joined the RAF and was

eventually killed at the age of 25 in

1945

and so I began to really consider this

idea of the journey and I started to

make theater that took people across

mountains at night which sounds

ludicrous but that’s what we did and

eventually I went to India because I

wanted to speak to Tibetans in exile

that had crossed the Himalaya which

seemed to me an unimaginable feat some

of them only 12 years old when they did

it and then I took myself up the high

Himalaya as well and unfortunately got

struck down with severe altitude

sickness a cerebral edema which is a

swelling of the brain well I was bought

into a valley and I was dropped off at a

dwelling a farm if you like with a

family and you have to lay on your back

really for at least a week to deal with

altitude sickness like this and they fed

me and they washed my clothes and they

nursed me and they shared Chang with me

which is a sort of barley beer and it

was the most amazingly compassionate

experience of my life

particularly in as much that there was

no expectation of pay although obviously

I did give them something for their

trouble and this really helped me to

embody this notion of crossing space in

peril something that really interests me

the PR in that actually etymologically

means to cross space you’ll find it in

other words like experience or perform

which is what I’m doing now with risk or

or experiment for example it’s also at

the roots of words for the pilgrim so

which comes from Peregrine’s so the P er

means to cross a space and there was a

really interesting book by Francesco

kerreri there was reading at a time as

well which charted really a history of

our distrust of nomadic cultures which

is another story but still quite an

interesting one recently my wife Shelley

is sitting there and I have been watched

The Walking Dead

now the walking dead and here’s a little

bit of a spoiler for you isn’t really

about zombies okay The Walking Dead is

about the complete loss of humanity at a

time of this terrible sort of plague of

zombies it’s about the loss of

compassion and it’s about the loss of a

sense of security and it’s also about an

endless journey of a group of people to

find something that ironically is

already there within them and I remember

we got to series free episode 12 in the

beginning of this episode Rick Grimes in

his son

Karl a journeying along the highway and

they’re off in search of some formula

milk they want to find some formula milk

for Rick’s baby so driving along and

they see a chap on the side of the

highway with a rucksack and pots and

pans and he’s desperately waving at them

for help he’s on his own he’s

desperately waving at them to slow down

and help and they slow down and you

think oh they can stop but their faces

are just expressionless and just as he

walks towards the car they accelerate

away and leave him and then at the end

of the episode they’re returning and

they found their formula milk in some

abandoned town and they come upon his

half-eaten corpse and they stop the car

and they get out and they retrieve his

rucksack throw it in the boot and off

they drive again and again not a word

he’s spoken and at this point we

realized that there’s absolutely no

future for Humanity because they’ve lost

all sense of compassion so isn’t about

infrastructure it’s about the loss of

compassion and the will to trust or help

one another as a phase-two practitioner

I’ve always been fascinated by the life

and work of Antonin Artaud and he wrote

a bizarre and wonderful book called the

theater and it’s double and which you

shouldn’t try to read unless you’ve

already read a biography of him because

it is quite bizarre read otherwise but

in this book he suggests that theater

and the plague are the only two spaces

where we have the possibility of seeing

human beings as they really are stripped

that is of things like national identity

rank or professional role it’s actually

at a time of the plague for example and

I don’t think he’s been negative I think

he’s at a time of a plague for example

that we’ll see the best in people we

have seen that in recent years in Africa

but we’ve also seen it with atrocities

in our own lifetime such as 9/11

so in 9/11 people were covered in this

terrible white dust and the white dust

in a sense modernizes what we see so

it’s much harder to kind of see any

symbol of affluence or rank or

professional role or even race but what

we do see is that people help one

another and not just the services who

were fantastic but people are helping

one another they’re carrying each other

they’re lifting one another they’re

helping each other and they’re putting

their own lives at risk because that

white dust actually the inhalation of it

has killed more people since 9/11 then

actually died on the day I don’t know if

you aware of that

more recently in some of the footage of

other terrible situations we’ve seen

similar things if I take you back I’m

sorry to do so but Tabata clan you

remember the terrifying image of a young

woman hanging by her fingertips from a

window and a man called Sebastian puts

his own life at risk to pull her back in

and she was pregnant

other people break cover and they come

out to drag people clear putting again

their own lives at risk and this really

interests me now um I want to introduce

you to a couple of authors

the first one is Antoine de

saint-exupéry who wrote as you might

know Liberty prompts the little prince

which is my favorite book as a child but

he was a pioneering pilot and he flew

postal services over the Andes and over

the Sahara and he wrote a lot of books

quite philosophical actually about these

journeys and when a second world war

came about he wanted to join up much

against the wishes of his publisher in

New York and his government who felt

that his saw Lee’s pen was much mightier

than

sword but he did join up and he joined

the Free French Air Force and he became

a reconnaissance pilot flying in towards

the invasion the invading forces to get

information out recently I adapted this

book for theater and it was directed by

Shelley and we’ve shown it in Armenia

and in France and we’ve shown it in

Britain as well and the reason interest

me is this flight to Arras is about one

flight that he takes towards eros and

the Blitzkrieg has hit Paris

so eros is on fire the tanks are rolling

the anti-aircraft guns are firing into

the air it’s just he’s just flying into

hell and as he’s flying along he’s

thinking he’s almost bound to die

so what is it that he’s going to die for

he’s trying to figure out what is it

that’s worth dying for

and he looks down from his aircraft

above France and he sees houses on fire

below him and he imagines the linen

burning in the closet imagines the

photographs the family history is

disappearing he looks down at the roads

and the roads are absolutely teeming

with refugees now this is France this is

only 70 or so years ago the roads are

teeming with the French with as refugees

and they’re heading south and he knows

that they’re just going to be

transformed into vermin and locusts as

they sweep through villages eating all

the food available so the villagers just

join the exodus and in all of that

Santee Sioux pre completely loses sight

of his belief in God for example he

can’t see a future for France he can’t

see a future for Europe and he can’t see

any future for civilization so what an

earth is it that he’s going to die for

what is worth dying for

I’ll come back to him first I want you

to say it’s to take you to Adam Smith

had a great nose and Adam Smith of

course wrote The Wealth of Nations which

is a sort of bedrock or cornerstone of

capitalists consumerist culture we think

of it as

we’ve such terms as dog-eat-dog world

and this sort of thing but he also wrote

another book which he’s far he was far

more proud of actually and he returned

he was so proud of this book he returned

to at the end of his life and in another

edition in 1790 and this book was called

the Theory of Moral Sentiments and it’s

extraordinary and quite ironic when you

think about its relationship to the

wealth of nations because he says in

this book that human beings are

essentially altruistic in nature that

they want to help each other actually

that we have this automatic in Bill

instinct to help even for no personal

gain and the book starts like this how

selfish so ever man may be supposed

there are evidently some principles in

his nature which interest him in the

fortune of others and render their

happiness necessary to him for who

derives nothing from it except the

pleasure of seeing it please remember it

was 1790 and things were a little bit

male gendered in the language of these

rings at the point so it’s he all the

way for it but he means us um and he

refers to this quality of wanting to

help each other as loveliness which is

quite a soft word by today’s standard

but loving this he talks about the

choice for right action not born of a

need to please so much as a wish to

serve with prudence justice and

beneficence so if I translate that we

might say that it’s careful oneself care

for fairness or justice if you like to

oneself and others and generosity of

spirit to others you’re all aware of

these values and I find that

extraordinary because I think there’s a

huge amount of truth in it actually

so he’s written this book alongside The

Wealth of Nations but he gives us a

problem and to illustrate this problem

I’m gonna ask you a question I need to

see a race you to raise hands if there

was goodness forbid let’s say a disaster

near here let’s just say a river is

birthed it’s bang and two miles away

from rotates from where you live or

rivers burst its banks and two miles

away a village is being flooded I want

you to raise your hands do you think

that you would go two miles waded in

water and help people out if it was that

local if it was two miles because he

could people raise their hands

quite a lot of you few people going

there now might be cold to Mars yeah I

think you would I think generally

speaking if it was that close to you

would how about if it was the next town

ten miles away could you raise your

lovely some honesty no room so it’s a

maybe ten miles away and we’re already

saying would maybe a wouldn’t 30 miles

there’s one person saying I think it

would and generally speaking there it’s

a no isn’t it so 100 miles away forget

it unless it unless it’s a close member

of a family or friends and a thousand

miles away I’m upset about it I am I’m

worried

really not my problem yes okay and

that’s how we are

so Christmas myths problem is locality

because he says yeah you know we are all

altruistic in nature we will lift people

off the street they fall over in front

of us doesn’t matter who they are but

this is really localized because

instinctively it’s also about

self-preservation if we sort of help our

tribe our immediate tribe then in a

sense we’re creating more security for

ourselves so this is the Lynx thing so

this is my idea I think that given the

immediacy of this technology that

connects us globally to the world we

really need to work harder to rewire

ourselves to think about what local

means we need to make these events far

more local because of the immediacy of

our technology and we need actually to

help out in all the ways that we

possibly can we will feel good about

that

but in order to do that we also have to

change the notion of what we belong to

and we have to flip it around because

we’ve got to get rid of the divisive

nurse of belonging because the flipside

of belonging is exclusion so if I were

to give you an example if I go to a

festival like a bit of rock if I go to

the download festive

or something like that okay and I’m

there I’m there amongst lots of

different age groups loads of different

races lots of different religions lots

of different ranks and professional

roles but somehow we’re there together

and we all have a sense of belonging in

a celebratory rather lovely way together

and so we also need to redefine what it

is we belong to in those very positive

aspects and I’m going to finish with

telling you what something super II did

die for because he was eventually shot

down in 1944 exactly the same time as my

grandfather who flew a Wellington bomber

that was built in Chester and what was

it that he would die for well at the end

of flight tariffs he sort of lands and

he’s walking along the country lane back

to the little farming family that he’s

billeted with a lovely family and he

suddenly has a bit of an epiphany and he

realizes that he wouldn’t die for that

family he wouldn’t die for the refugees

that he saw on the road all those

hundreds of feet below the aircraft he

wouldn’t die even for the victims of war

what he would die for was the people

that would help them he would die for

the person that would give up their seat

in the back of a truck for a pregnant

pregnant woman he would die for the

person that would carry someone else on

their back he would die for the person

that put their own self at risk to get

someone out of danger and he would die

for the person that pulls someone else

from underneath the rubble and at this

point something Zoop REE REE finds his

idea of God and he looks out and he can

see the fields of France again and he

can see a future for Europe and he can

see a future for civilization because he

knows that people are predominantly good thank you very much

Please follow and like us: