Press "Enter" to skip to content

The Failure of Success | J. Aaron Simmons | TEDxFurmanU


hey everyone so my name is Aaron and I’m

here to invite you to do some philosophy

with me and usually when I say I’m a

philosopher to people on planes that

leads to the magazine goes up and

headphones goes on kind of response so

we’ll see if I can do little better with

you all

so philosophy can be understood as a

bunch of different things I’m gonna give

you two options one philosophy is a

professional discourse it’s the thing

that other people do you know people

like me who have PhDs in philosophy who

write books with titles that no one then

wants to buy or we can understand

philosophy as a way of life this is the

way the ancient Greeks understood it and

philosophy is something then that we all

can do but instead of having to choose

today I don’t want to cause you any

stress you’re both right so philosophy

the way I understand it is basically

just people who put question marks where

everybody else puts periods now that

could be something we do as

professionals like me so I put

professional question marks behind all

kinds of very wordy questions that have

a lot of ontological and

phenomenological sorts of phrases but

what really matters about philosophy is

that we all recognize what happens in

life if we start putting squiggly lines

instead of just dots and so let’s ask

some questions together and see what

happens now not all questions are

equally valuable so if you say what kind

of coffee do I like to drink I find that

a stupid question because I don’t like

coffee so let’s find a little bit better

question how about what’s the meaning of

life good question

not yet no response none at all why

because this question is the kind of

thing that Monty Python makes a lot of

money joking about right so let’s try to

avoid things like that and instead ask a

question that has a little bit more

focused relevance to us so how about

let’s tighten things up what makes life

worth living a little better well still

kind of abstract not sure what life

means whose life the life of my dog what

what life we’re talking about

so I think we make things practical we

make them personal so let’s make

something personal what do you desire

most in life here I’m trying to switch

the question and make it more like a st.

Agustin question our identity is

constituted by the object of our desire

so let’s think about what we desire in

order to think about who we are so that

we can hopefully put some question marks

in really important places let’s see how

it happened there are two common answers

to this question what do you desire most

in life at least as given by my students

in intro to philosophy

I have asked hundreds of them this

question I only ever get variations of

two answers the first and by far most

prominent is they desire success not a

bad answer who doesn’t want to be

successful right well second answer

happiness happiness also seems like a

really smart thing a little bit more

introspective and reflective people who

write happiness always feel

self-righteous that they wrote happiness

and not success when they hear sort of

how this breaks out but here’s the thing

both of these have some problems when we

seek success it turns out that we fear

failure when we seek happiness it turns

out that we fear a kind of loneliness

but what’s interesting about this is

success though a noble thing my talk is

not hey don’t seek success but don’t

seek success as your ultimate end why

not because if you succeed success as

your ultimate end you’re always ever

making sense of your life relative to

some external that you achieve rather

than reflecting on who it is and why you

live it in the first place

happiness again a lot better maybe but

happiness today tends to look an awful

lot like how can I just be in a

particular state of mind that you may

not be in so I think the problem with

happiness is we confuse it with a

psychological state rather than a

general orientation towards well-being

so I’m gonna suggest that we seek

something else as our ultimate end I’m

gonna throw out faithfulness as an idea

maybe we should seek faithfulness now

look by faithfulness I am NOT talking

about any religious disposition I’m

talking about living into what you

throwing yourself into something on

purpose and this definition of faith

then is simply the idea that we risk our

lives in a direction that we do things

on purpose for reasons and we recognize

that none of it is ultimately safe so

what direction is worth the risk it’s

not going to involve skydiving for me

nor is it going to involve law school

right we all make decisions about what

direction is worth of the risk so here’s

a really cool truth when you seek to be

faithful you’re likely to get success

thrown in because you care about

excellence relative to what you think

matters but when you seek success you’re

likely not even to be successful at what

you thought mattered because you aren’t

actively reflecting and living into that

decision so here’s another cool truth

there’s a distinction between jealousy

and admiration if we seek success as our

ultimate end we’re likely to understand

our lives relative to jealousy I want

what they have I want that car that job

that 401k that portfolio right that

recognition I’m jealous of them so I’m

not striving to be like someone I’m

striving to have what they have

they are irrelevant there’s no character

emulation if we seek faithfulness my

hunch is that we will cultivate and

invite admiration whereby people matter

not just for what they’ve done but for

being the kind of person who would do it

think about mother Teresa in Martin

Luther K Martin Luther King so mother

Teresa was actually the inspiration for

this talk she actually says were called

upon not to be successful but to be

faithful and Martin Luther King imagine

this if you said oh well he was sought

out to be successful at instantiating

racial justice but he didn’t quite pull

it off so we would say his life was a

failure what a really bad assessments of

him right instead and this is on the

Martin Luther King memorial and says

look I was a drum major for justice

peace and righteousness in other words I

lived my life striving for this yes we

want to be successful but success and

failure are not defining why I get out

of bed and

I do what I do so here’s the big idea

we’re sharing

right Ted’s about ideas we’re sharing

here’s an idea I think each shared more

often in our culture that says success

success success seeking success actually

makes you more likely to fail at doing

what matters this is true not only for

individuals but for institutions for

groups for communities I am a specialist

in philosophy of religion so I’m going

to talk a little bit about

Christianity’s what I work on I’m a

specialist in political philosophy so

let’s talk about democracy and I also

happen to teach at a university so let’s

talk about college education these three

instances where if we seek success as

our ultimate aim we’re likely not even

to be good at being Christians being

Democrats and being University educators

how about Christianity first so three

people that I have been influenced by

Soren Kierkegaard Dietrich Bonhoeffer

and Ann Lamont they all wrote in

different time periods they all have

different stories but three ideas they

give us is that Christianity is

fundamentally about modeling ourselves

on a narrative of the divine as humbled

as self emptied so character Gard says

that when Christianity gets power and

becomes a political might becomes

Christendom what does it need it needs

somebody to bring Christianity back to

it because now it’s become triumphant

Dietrich Bonhoeffer loses his life he

gets murdered by the National Socialists

or the end of World War two he

differentiates between costly grace and

cheap grace and he says cheap grace is

the kind of thing that can become

commodified and sold costly grace is the

kind of thing that invites us ever

forward recognizing it’s not about what

we do but about that for which we do

what we do and and Lamont says there’s

three prayers she likes I pray these a

bunch help thanked and Wow notice we

start recognizing our insufficiency then

we move to a mode of gratitude as a way

of life and we end in wonder philosophy

began in wonder and part of what I’m

suggesting is religious existence ends

in that same sense of wonder this is a

far stretch from those conceptions of

Christianity that model themselves on

corporate success

audience numbers material wealth and

priding themselves on the ability to be

better than others rather than loving

God we love our own churches rather than

loving the costly grace we love the fact

that it can be mass-produced when we

seek success we fail to be what we

should have been what about democracy

now here I’m not talking about

conservative Democrat the mops I’m

talking about democracy as a mode of

human existence in social life that says

at the end of the day all of us are

engaged with each other relative to a

commitment to the Equality of critique

every voice is equally able to offer

critique and offer praise that’s what

democracy is about it’s about equality

and Liberty to say your voice matters

just as much as my own so when we think

about faithfulness to democracy

here’s two good models Jacques Derrida

says that democracy is only ever just

when it’s not Democratic enough yet

notice we’re striving toward it’s not

about pulling it off we have done it we

are the greatest nation you end up

saying we are great because we recognize

there is a long way left to go we are

most democratic when we recognize we are

not yet democracy instantiated we’re on

the way

similarly Jean Tom wolf says democracy

works best when we recognize it as

agonistic conflictual we need those with

whom we disagree to disagree with us and

do it well

but when we vilify when we demonize

those with whom we disagree as being

irrational or immoral what have we done

we’ve sought to win the election while

losing the democratic society that we

claimed to care about hmm finally

college education a bunch of in this

room have gone to college others of you

are in college some of you like my son

in the back row or hopefully going to go

to college at some point here’s the

thing college at its most basic is the

idea that we can transmit human knowing

and also that we can create new

knowledge College is not merely a

transmission device it is an invitation

to put question

marks where others have put periods and

figured new things out in that since I’m

actually worried about a new trend

towards college success which ends up

being we will give you real-world

experience and a good return on

investment

now notice both are good things we

should care about returns on investments

because money is finite we should care

about having experience in the kinds of

careers we might want to go into because

we might decide that wasn’t for us all

good

but if that becomes the final end then

notice we care about giving real-world

experience in the sense that we want

experiences of the world that someone

else has dictated as real for us but the

university its identity is to invite our

students to figure out what world should

be made real similarly if we want the

return on investment we’ve got to

recognize that college is more than just

dollars and cents and employment

statistics it’s not just about what

majors lead to high employment

what kind of salaries they average but

it’s instead about inviting us all to

recognize what is worth our investment

of time and energy and emotion and

passion and our own sense of value let’s

go back to our first question what do

you desire most in life my hunch is you

all will have different kinds of answers

for this and it will be different at

different times in our life thank

goodness I don’t desire what I desire

220 very bad but when we recognize that

we might want to start thinking about

desiring faithfulness some really

interesting things follow first when we

desire faithfulness we take ownership of

the risk and direction of our lives not

just our careers in other words we

become the kind of people for whom jobs

matter not the kind of people who are

determined by the mattering of our job

second we desire faithfulness we may

find success but we’re not defined by it

which means we are also not destroyed by

failure but remember it’s not just what

does one desire it’s what do you desire

when we desire faithfulness when you

desire faithfulness you are more likely

to find question-marks themselves as an

invitation

rather than as an obstacle and this is

really amazing because ultimately our

lives will not be defined by where we

put the question marks but where we

decided to put the periods if all we do

is live lives where others have handed

us periods we’ve never actually lived a

life that others might want to consider

so at the end of the day if we

understand philosophy as a way of life

we understand faithfulness then as a

task for a lifetime we don’t then get

that partnership buy that house achieve

that goal succeed in our retirement

plans and then get up the next day and

wonder now what we instead recognize

that every day is an invitation to

continue moving forward my wife and I we

got married said something to each other

in our wedding vows it was a very simple

line but for me it encapsulates

everything I do as a philosopher come

let’s walk together and talk along the

way it’s the way that matters not just

where we end up thank you all so much

[Applause] [Music]

Please follow and like us: