line after prosperity
He returned to fun especially
when we constantly hear in
means politicians to many sources
We are bad the world is going to end the
poverty inequality that things are not
They go well and of course we have problems
but I want to solve today take
on a trip and think a bit with him in
the long term think a little
everything is really bad all around
walk negatively but not
I think we live in one of the times
more than prosperity without
precedents and I will touch and economic
material was touching a hot topic
Interestingly , the population and its
relation to health
if you set at Creek
Mine is demonstrating that this is
the relationship between growth
World population and the changes and
technological
what we have here is more or less
for the calendar year zero
Gregorian on the cusp of silver
Roman world had about 300
million unless
America today less than three times
Mexico and certain counts to
had better between 180 and 180 then
300 no no
Many inhabitants of the population
stable and remained stable
when Thomas Malthus fact that he
They said they would put the economy
the same dismal science not science
He said he could not be more
population were taken over by the
resources we had we could not
go ahead because own
resources would be over and over again
and the people here because it is going to
die when he was writing that
in 1798 it is going change
the first major revolution
industrial
is a fully turn the appearance of
resources more resources
the population began to grow we are today
more than 7,000 million people
three of those 300 in year zero in
last 200 years has grown
Stratospheric population in a way
and that led to discussions at the time
in the 70s there were discussions very
more serious among demographers
strong and if I could at that time
there were about one billion
people
if he could endure the world more and more
people really can
clearly we are there perhaps are
pushing some resources but
creativity
Innovation has agreed to solve
many parts and a very important step
population growth concerns
with life expectancy
We live today is much more average years
one say in the pre season
modern
this is before the Renaissance
people did not live more than 30 years
Jesus ‘ life expectancy
This is a series that takes us to
1,500 and both land and then a
number of countries from the 19th century
what we see is that growth
again from the first
industrial Revolution
industrialized countries have one
growth in that in that hope
life growth and disparity
the health between countries
with the industrialization and those without
that gap is closed again in
last decades
today we are more egalitarian in terms
health between regions
among countries 200 years ago
and today this is going and this generation x
There were not many Estimated generation if
there is a role to life expectancy if
there is still a limit and each abutment
it raises it breaks breaks that
sometimes blow job by opel
for example each for five years each
Once it is for example and my wife has
Women at the exit so you do
is not a grandmother died at 95 years
another 101 is most likely already
more than one hundred and overcome my daughters
that amount is not here
relatively young or mixed hearing
we were here 100 years ago
two – thirds of us would not be
we had died and many of us
before the month before the year before
five years much had us
we would not arrive dead no
to
that part of the break the
infant mortality is not explained in
largely growth in
Life expectancy at birth but
even for those who spent five
years lived around 1850 and jumped
up to 55 years
right now he lives up to two years in a
gain an additional 27 years and
let you platicarles an additional factor
health – related height
we are becoming more companies
size
this notice such line
Holland shows orange men
Dutch more or less grew 20
centimeters between 1850 and today
meters is far are are
giant comparatively is what
what I know why we are interested
the issue is related height
with more robust bodies with agencies
which they are more robust are
having a better net Nutrition
nutrition goal is what we eat
but also what we release what
then we discard such a child
and that is very important especially in
stages of development
when we are children when we are
growing a child who is suffering from
not continuous constant diarrheas
has
is hardly going to reach its
height
this potential even when made
the amount of food necessary for the
changes in health changes in
public health and not necessarily the
medicine and genetics also explains
many of these irresponsible
Now I can say hey but I see
that increasingly grows in cancer and
each time the two infarctions grows
and each time the diabetes grows
it is true that more and weighs more
because we live grow up
Beyond these chronic diseases not
were an issue in the past we were dying
acute illnesses that kill us
and iu that time and indeed for example
which further explains the disease
Cardiovascular is the age we are going
making rigid groups go
covering and that’s what generates the
cardiovascular problems
Something similar happens with cancer is a
theme repeated many times
there may be faults that again
then again repeat and age does not
It explains a lot because we those
nurses
but then again I want you
raise the long-term film
where we stand and because this
Paradox is not
complaints of our of our time
We are prisoners in our time
we hypothesize someone to
For whom is sell all
our shortcomings we lack everything
some political media to the
marketing is not what I think again
I wanted to create a space and
Reflection is not with you many
Thank you
[Applause]
[Music]
after the
He returned to fun especially
when we constantly hear in
means politicians to many sources
We are bad the world is going to end the
poverty inequality that things are not
They go well and of course we have problems
but I want to solve today take
on a trip and think a bit with him in
the long term think a little
everything is really bad all around
walk negatively but not
I think we live in one of the times
more than prosperity without
precedents and I will touch and economic
material was touching a hot topic
Interestingly , the population and its
relation to health
if you set at Creek
Mine is demonstrating that this is
the relationship between growth
World population and the changes and
technological
what we have here is more or less
for the calendar year zero
Gregorian on the cusp of silver
Roman world had about 300
million unless
America today less than three times
Mexico and certain counts to
had better between 180 and 180 then
300 no no
Many inhabitants of the population
stable and remained stable
when Thomas Malthus fact that he
They said they would put the economy
the same dismal science not science
He said he could not be more
population were taken over by the
resources we had we could not
go ahead because own
resources would be over and over again
and the people here because it is going to
die when he was writing that
in 1798 it is going change
the first major revolution
industrial
is a fully turn the appearance of
resources more resources
the population began to grow we are today
more than 7,000 million people
three of those 300 in year zero in
last 200 years has grown
Stratospheric population in a way
and that led to discussions at the time
in the 70s there were discussions very
more serious among demographers
strong and if I could at that time
there were about one billion
people
if he could endure the world more and more
people really can
clearly we are there perhaps are
pushing some resources but
creativity
Innovation has agreed to solve
many parts and a very important step
population growth concerns
with life expectancy
We live today is much more average years
one say in the pre season
modern
this is before the Renaissance
people did not live more than 30 years
Jesus ‘ life expectancy
This is a series that takes us to
1,500 and both land and then a
number of countries from the 19th century
what we see is that growth
again from the first
industrial Revolution
industrialized countries have one
growth in that in that hope
life growth and disparity
the health between countries
with the industrialization and those without
that gap is closed again in
last decades
today we are more egalitarian in terms
health between regions
among countries 200 years ago
and today this is going and this generation x
There were not many Estimated generation if
there is a role to life expectancy if
there is still a limit and each abutment
it raises it breaks breaks that
sometimes blow job by opel
for example each for five years each
Once it is for example and my wife has
Women at the exit so you do
is not a grandmother died at 95 years
another 101 is most likely already
more than one hundred and overcome my daughters
that amount is not here
relatively young or mixed hearing
we were here 100 years ago
two – thirds of us would not be
we had died and many of us
before the month before the year before
five years much had us
we would not arrive dead no
to
that part of the break the
infant mortality is not explained in
largely growth in
Life expectancy at birth but
even for those who spent five
years lived around 1850 and jumped
up to 55 years
right now he lives up to two years in a
gain an additional 27 years and
let you platicarles an additional factor
health – related height
we are becoming more companies
size
this notice such line
Holland shows orange men
Dutch more or less grew 20
centimeters between 1850 and today
meters is far are are
giant comparatively is what
what I know why we are interested
the issue is related height
with more robust bodies with agencies
which they are more robust are
having a better net Nutrition
nutrition goal is what we eat
but also what we release what
then we discard such a child
and that is very important especially in
stages of development
when we are children when we are
growing a child who is suffering from
not continuous constant diarrheas
has
is hardly going to reach its
height
this potential even when made
the amount of food necessary for the
changes in health changes in
public health and not necessarily the
medicine and genetics also explains
many of these irresponsible
Now I can say hey but I see
that increasingly grows in cancer and
each time the two infarctions grows
and each time the diabetes grows
it is true that more and weighs more
because we live grow up
Beyond these chronic diseases not
were an issue in the past we were dying
acute illnesses that kill us
and iu that time and indeed for example
which further explains the disease
Cardiovascular is the age we are going
making rigid groups go
covering and that’s what generates the
cardiovascular problems
Something similar happens with cancer is a
theme repeated many times
there may be faults that again
then again repeat and age does not
It explains a lot because we those
nurses
but then again I want you
raise the long-term film
where we stand and because this
Paradox is not
complaints of our of our time
We are prisoners in our time
we hypothesize someone to
For whom is sell all
our shortcomings we lack everything
some political media to the
marketing is not what I think again
I wanted to create a space and
Reflection is not with you many
Thank you
[Applause]
[Music]
after the
Please follow and like us: