Press "Enter" to skip to content

Killing Breast Cancer – The Lavender Way | Phillip Bretz | TEDxSDSU


that this better have a Hollywood ending

or I should stay home so I’ll let you

decide but we’ve been at this for a long

time so to hear what you got in here

today and I know this topic is a problem

for a lot of people it’s touched us for

so long on promise that wasn’t gonna do

this and so I think I’ve been at this

for 30 years and I think I can bring a

different conclusion to this whole thing

what I’d like to do is bring on a

journey from where I was trained in the

70s which were something you weren’t

even born yet so back to where I am

today and back in the 70s it was very

aggressive surgery for breast cancer we

were gonna teach that cancer a lesson

the bigger the tumor the bigger the

knife we got out and and and that and

end up in the surgery took two hours we

had two assistants with big retractors

and patients spent days in the hospital

trying to just move her arm again okay

that’s how I was trained

we obliterated women unnecessarily as it

turns out but it took a long time to

come to the conclusion that you don’t

have to do it if you just don’t follow

the recipe everybody follows so from

there I treat now with the FDA approved

it’s called scenario specific a to

system uses liquid nitrogen it’s about

minus 300 degrees so it’s pretty cold if

you stick your finger in it and flick it

it will fall off so I have to be really

careful because I’m dealing with the

breast you know come on guys

you know and so procedure lasts about 20

minutes they resume normal activity and

I haven’t even put a stitch in

and it’s so good that I at this point in

time I invite members of the family and

to hold the patient’s hand can you

believe that you know so in fact if one

of the patients her husband was a lawyer

so I invited him in and that was

probably the first time an attorney had

ever watched something like this or any

doctor invited an attorney into a

procedure yeah it’s it’s it’s really

that good I knew I was walking on

hallowed ground when I when I when I did

my first cases in fact one of my

patients the first time we did this

immediately after the procedure she said

she felt so hungry she wanted to go

across the street so we all went across

the street to lavender Bistro and lucky

that it’s a high-end restaurant and when

in 15 minutes she was eating lobster

salad and we toasted killing her cancer

so two year over two years later when I

just looked at her mammogram no cancer

on it okay it was clear as a bell I

pumped my fist and I wiped the tear like

I’m doing huh because I knew I knew I

had an answer to a problem that has

plagued us since recorded medical

history 2300 BC the Edwin Smith papyrus

you can look it up they didn’t know how

to treat breast cancer then they said

they didn’t know what to do they just

threw their hands up so my wife actually

came up with with the name she says you

realize what happened we should just

call this the lavender way I said okay

so that’s what it is

the lavender way encompasses three

things pharmacogenomics multiple

modalities without radiation use

mammography – I don’t want to unplug

mammography machines it’s a really great

great tool been with us for a long time

and then the treatment and it’s all done

under the umbrella of what I call

sanctuary centers where we take breast

cancer doctors out of behind a

metaphorical wall at these cancer

centers because you don’t get to see

these guys these guys spend a lot of

time getting educated and know a lot

about breast cancer but they don’t have

any interaction with you until you come

in with a lump and they try and put you

back together again so I figured let’s

look let’s get these guys out from

behind a wall and into making a

relationship with these girls early on

so that the idea is maybe a twenty

something or a 30 something year old

when she wants to know no pressure she

comes in we do the genetic testing this

isn’t Braca one and two that’s only good

for 10% of the population so we have the

capability now in every girl not to just

know her risk but when that risk will

likely manaphy

within about 10 years during her

lifetime yep it’s like having a crystal

ball for me finally there were all these

years sorry and if you’ve seen the

devastation like I had I had a girl died

in my arms for God’s sake back in the

hospital 20 years ago before she died I

told her that I i would not relent until

i had an answer excuse me

this gets really tough for me because

gps dermatologists don’t deal with this

stuff and it’s really difficult when you

can’t do anymore for a patient but now I

so it’s an umbrella of nurturing

environment for these women and there’s

no pressure and we we do this years

before she’s gonna you know ever

encounter breast cancer and the idea is

to prevent it all together in the also

the idea is that if we get this right

now we have the technology where I can

zero in on these cancers when they’re

about four millimeters that’s about the

size of a kernel of corn okay and at

that size virtually none of those don’t

say none because it’s cancer and it does

what it does but even if a cancer has

potential to be very aggressive later on

probably isn’t when it’s this big okay

the average sized tumor is over a

centimeter and size that has a billion

cancer cells in it and probably has

metastatic disease already cancer that’s

spread so the idea is to get it before

we do that and then I was trained in the

70s to get it all and guess what it

didn’t work did it

because otherwise 40,000 women wouldn’t

be dying every year okay

and and that’s a problem and then so if

we get if we know when the cancers

coming we can plan out for her a

lifelong

personalized surveillance program and as

the time approaches where that cancer is

gonna we think it’s coming we can just

go ahead and accelerate the imaging so

we find these little tiny cancers okay

ultra small cancers I call them so I use

three I use three modalities I use

modified military infrared this isn’t

your father’s thermography from the

seventies that everybody says doesn’t

work this works plenty good otherwise

the military wouldn’t be using it so

Bush Declassified this and it not only

has you in it just detects heat

signatures in the breast and there’s no

there’s no there’s no compression girls

so there’s not like mammography and it

also has artificial intelligence so it

has the capability once it knows your

heat signatures it runs it by just

instantaneously by five hundred girls

that are in the computer that have

abnormal infrared heat signature and

breast cancer so it’ll tell me right

away basically so it can really it’s

really differentiated between benign and

malignant disease for me and in some

cases it’s it’s actually one of the

drawbacks with this stuff we’re working

on refining it but one of the drawbacks

is it’ll tell me there’s a cancer there

and mammography and MRI doesn’t pick it

up and then three years later bingo

there it is so we’re working on that

trust me I’m working on this like a hawk

because I want this what if we could get

it when there’s a millimeter okay then

it wouldn’t really finish chemotherapy

not that I have anything against it but

needs it okay so so that’s that’s really

where it’s at and I you know I think I

have an answer to this thing a workable

answer otherwise it wouldn’t be standing

here and not a problem though we’ve

depend enough on the same system for the

past thirty years okay and that is we’ve

told women we’ve sold mammography

probably better than anything else on

planet just go get a mammogram every

year do self breast exam and run a race

and everything’s gonna be okay and it

just isn’t is it

we still have the same 200,000 cases

every year into 40,000 deaths for as

long I think I can remember and if the

National Cancer Institute is right they

wrote a paper published it last year by

2030 we’re gonna have double the number

of breast cancer cases in this country

so that’ll be four hundred thousand and

if we do the same old same old

it’ll be eighty thousand deaths so if

we’re not prepared to do that then what

I’m calling for is this country has to

decide how it’s gonna treat women for

the next 20 years what do women mean to

us are we gonna change our attitude and

and see what’s out there or are we just

gonna do wait for the next drug that

extends life for three months no this

really works and I knew I was walking on

hallowed ground the light went off for

me when I combo at all these

technologies so I have the infrared

right in the office they’re right next

to it is my exam table next to that is

my ultrasound unit with elast Tigra

feels me whether something’s hard or

soft and we have Doppler flow and right

next to that is a view box so I can look

at the mammogram so I have that

capability to put all these together

right at every visit if I need to use

them and we do and so we find these

little tiny cancers it makes a big

difference because then we can do

lavender okay and just for everybody if

there’s any doctors in the audience

there say oh you can’t do that for

everybody because cancer is widespread

okay so we’re going to do genetic

studies on the tumor and if yeah so it’s

a four millimeter tumor and it’s

aggressive so you still want to do

sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary

node surgery you can do that you can

still do chemotherapy but just leave the

breast alone because it doesn’t make any

difference it’s never been shown to be

better than lumpectomy we’ve spent 300

billion dollars since

Nixon pen the National Cancer Act in

1971 and part of that money went to

multiple clinical trials that proved

lumpectomy was just as good as

mastectomy now we have a movement in

this country called unko plastic surgery

so the surgeons are gearing up for more

radical surgery American College of

Surgeons in the paper came out last

month 2000 January 2016 and the titleist

was the title was bilateral mastectomy

driven by fear or prevention and one of

the writers said we are facing a tsunami

of requests for mastectomy I can only

say that you know this is wrong this is

really not good is this the answer we

have for women after 300 billion dollars

in 40 years of research that we’re gonna

take both breasts off why don’t we just

do it at puberty and then we’ll rid

ourselves of the whole damn problem guys

wouldn’t like that though No so yeah

you’re right yeah so it’s one of the

foundations of our country for God’s

sake so no we want to do this a

different way and so we need people to

to you know embrace this okay to look

around other rather than just looking

for the next drug so when I do this

procedure its outpatient procedure do it

under local anesthesia and as I said you

know they resume normal activity right

away and a couple of things I’ve

mentioned as the we kill the cancer and

about two months after we do core

biopsies on all these patients because I

want to make sure I kill the cancer so

we really don’t lose anything you can

look my you know you could always take

the breast off if you have to you can’t

put it back on so by doing the lavender

I kill it in 20 minutes with the saneras

physica 2 system and it’s dead and we

biopsy it and it’s dead it comes to the

pathology reports come back fat necrosis

and infarction and I almost fell off

because I lied to the pathologist I

didn’t tell them what I was doing

I didn’t tell him I what I was doing and

I wanted to see what he what they would

say and that’s what they said and that’s

what they all say okay and so so as the

dead cancer cells are absorbed in the

body because we don’t operate on the

patient that acts like a dead polio

virus so the patient’s own immune system

is producing specific antibodies against

her specific tumor that’s preliminary

data so you know it’ll take fifteen

years to to decide you know if this is

going to make a difference in terms of

recurrences or survival okay so but

that’s can’t hurt

I don’t think and then we also solve the

age-old problem of positive margins in

the same American College of Surgeons

article they said that the take back for

a second lumpectomy because oh there was

cancer at the 6 o’clock margin and in

the radio and a radiation therapist

doesn’t want to do radiation because

there’s there’s cancer there you have to

go back and get it okay so we go back

and get it 40% of the time is the

average okay and they had a 30%

complication rate in young women in 30

year olds 30% complication in and in 70

year olds the complication rate was 75%

come on where are these people I mean

come on we’ve got to do this better for the girls don’t

Please follow and like us: