[Applause]
so first of all I would like to thank
you all
me today and giving me the opportunity
to express myself considering that I
will be speaking about political facts I
would like to start by making the
following statement nothing that would
be expressed to my speech should be
considered as a political opinion but
rather as neutral form of analysis so
the subject that I chose to talk about
in Miami throughout this conference
would be to show you our calm art is
political in so many different ways it
did the arts are often least perceived
because people don’t look at them
don’t sit back on message and and and
I’m sure meaning and rather look at them
in a very superficial manner I took two
about it with a friend of mine the other
day at a party he was telling me that he
didn’t really understand how come an
artwork that he considers beautiful can
be lets say estimated 1 million and how
come another artwork that according to
him is not that relevant can be
estimated more than 1 million because
this I’d point to him is not that
beautiful I don’t know maybe was saying
it in a very superficial way for the
simple reason that he was not
considering the colors the dimensions
the artists themselves and so many other
things that must be considered before
judging another work of art la serie
precook Chanel dilemma alone the art is
the shortest path from man to man that
is very light importable dermal hole we
can get that artist he narrates our
heritage that arts are and have always
been part of what makes our society and
they’re an integral part of what makes
mankind in fact every society starts to
decline at the exact moment when one is
satisfied by a form of constancy coming
from artistic disciplines and it’s true
when we think about it we started to
create art for a peculiar reason
education we say
cream ice for Italian studies for making
history and transmitting our knowledge
to the next generations but not only
have we used it for doing bats but we
have also used it for building our
offices for making our temples and other
places of worship and also for making
our grades there they are it has
flourished in so many different ways
through art architecture design fashion
and so many different but how come is it
political well in order to respond to
this question I have chosen three
different perspectives for the simple
reason that I consider that the
difference of meaning conveyed by an
artwork now and by the time of its
creation is really important the first
aid way that I will be talking about is
knowledge enjoyment the Quebec the
origin of the world which was played in
1866 and now is at the side of all at
the Musee d’Orsay in Paris so what can
we see by looking at this painting what
can we call see what could we consider
well now we could consider it as
feminist and it’s true to some extent it
is feminist I mean it diffuses any
various to gaze and the nature of the
painting itself as much as this title
our feminist it raises even a lot of
questions some could consider a
blasphemous since it considers that the
most carnal part of a woman’s body is
the origin of the world but the thing is
that we only get to know the real
meaning and the real political
connotation of this artwork when we when
we see that a lot of artists have been
very inspired by it the first of them is
the body habitus who has made a
performance
on the 29th of May 2014 at the Musee
d’Orsay
so basically what she’s done is she sat
in front of the painting legs might open
while showing her warmest color to the
visitors by repeating over and over
again
I am the origin I am
woman you didn’t see me I want you to
recognize me virgin like water creator
of sperm until of course the people from
the security sr22 kindly follow them
another artist has been very well
inspired by it
her name is Allah when she has created
nourishing then again the origin of the
word in 1989 and I would like to take
this opportunity to thank her for giving
us the rights for displaying her work so
the point of you all out there is quite
feminist for the simple reason that she
doesn’t consider it she must ask to ask
yourself questions about feminism and
she considered that which shouldn’t see
feminism’s anymore as a form of exact
opposite of what machismo is but rather
as a form of a gamete organism the main
reason why both of these artists have
been very inspired by longish enjoyment
of Kobe is because even though now are
we could consider that it is feminists
in reality it’s not a new poll appears
in this very anachronistic form of
masculine feminism Quebec only cuts the
body to present us a trunk there is none
of an identity represented there there’s
only a sex a simple piece of flesh and
this example exactly show us that we
have to be more critical with what we
consider as sometimes the rarity is
quite different it also shows us that
art never stops evolving with time and
that even centuries after the
realization of an artwork it’s a
political connotation what might have
changed which brings us to the second
dimension of my expose art is used as a
medium for conveying political ideas in
order to speak about that I will start
by speaking at the eighth form of art
which is forecasting so my question is
what has been the very first political
word while life
broadcasted events well it has been the
opening speech of the 1936 Olympic Games
Organising Berlin and made by no other
than adult feature it has also been the
very first television transmission that
has been powerful enough to escape into
outer space
what does that mean that means that if
there are other forms of life in our
universe the first images that they will
receive from us how those cleanly has
benefited from from this outbreak for
his propaganda and as Marshall McGinnis
Mike Leland says the artist will only be
too happy to abdicate the politician
will only be happy to abdicate in favor
of this image because his image will
will be way more powerful than it could
ever be so recasting is is therefore
used as a way as a medium for conveying
ideas but still cinema the movie the
interview has been released in 2014 it’s
an American spy comedy movie that where
you have to interviewers that get to
meet North Korea’s leader but or in the
same time as in the same time asked by
the CIA to assassinate him it has had
two very strong reactions the very first
one has been in June 2014 when North
Korea threatens actions against the
United States the second one has been
made by a hacker groups group called the
borders of peace who threatened to
action against Sony and Columbia
Pictures if the movie were to be
released there by Sony had kind of no
choice to to take it off from the US
market then the out words are often
political but so are the artists quite
often let’s talk about Charlie Chaplin a
little bit
you couldn’t have been it couldn’t have
taken part in a more political artwork
than the Great Dictator that was
released in 1945 especially considering
is very known final speech
let’s under McCarthyism in the 50s
everything has changed it did under
Marcus’s influence in the United States
a form of friction high period hunting
down all the people that were suspected
to be communists a lot of artists were
in between all of them engage in those
people arrested goaded Charlie Chaplin
as well as many other people has been
blacklisted from Hollywood and of course
forbidden to to appear there sweetheart
street art is without any doubt one of
the most political form of it exists
it’s often a rebellious it’s often
rebellious and it’s it expresses freedom
of speech freedom of expression what has
been used in the framework of the
northern islands conflicts that lasted
in the late 20th century for over 30
years the birth it it pitted the
unionist and an alliance there were many
Protestants against the Republicans and
nationalists there were many Catholics
the basis mules constitute one of the
strongest form of low propaganda in the
world and they have been denouncing all
of the variances that occurred there for
over 30 years which brings us to the
third dimension of my expose how calm
cultural sites can be centers of
political tensions in order to talk a
little bit about that I will start by
talking about the ancient city of
Palmyra so what is Palmyra it’s an
ancient city that that is composed of
many temples in other places of worship
each praising different cultures and
beliefs so you have temples celebrating
local dailies mr. Pugh Tom Ian Greek
Roman Arabic and carefully gods that
constitute this ancient city uh nests
made of cultural diversity the premiere
and has a very strong connotation in the
confrontation of globalization of our
extremism for the simple reason that in
May 2015
highest has taken over the place I have
started destroying it’s started
destroying the UNESCO World Heritage
Sites the Syrian army’s thanks to the
help of the Russians have also have
taken it back in March 2016 and Palmilla
has had a very strong other political
connotation at that moment on the 5th of
May 2016 when a concert was organized in
the middle of the ruins by the symphony
orchestra of st. Petersburg
unfortunately ever since December 2016
Isis has taken back Palmyra and that
keeps on destroying its artworks and
when they are not destroying it and
their artworks they are sending them in
order to finance themselves now what I
am going to talk a bit about the
Acropolis unfortunately the person in
Greece in Athens it has been built in
the mid 50 centuries before Christ in in
the celebration of of a victory against
the Persian Empire it has also been
built in order to to hold the treasury
of Italian league that here’s a lake an
association that was made in between all
of the Greek city-states that most of
these frescoes and
but mostly housed at the British Museum
and some of them are do the new food has
before appear to have much as political
tensions between the United Kingdom and
Greece and the daughter who is defending
pregnant and rhesus in Greece is a well
to name particular so what is art and
where did we find it well are we can
find in these cultures we can find it in
performances we can find it in paintings
we can play music in cinema in
broadcasting which invited everywhere
for the simple reason that art is
nothing besides a certain way of saying
well I want to know if you text
I hope that thanks to my speech you are
able to see that there is so much to
learn from ours and there’s so much
chatter nice I hope that you will be
more critical in more curious into the
future but looking at something and that
she will understand that there are
consequences that explain what you’re
doing and everyone on really sad
[Applause]
[Music]
you
so first of all I would like to thank
you all
me today and giving me the opportunity
to express myself considering that I
will be speaking about political facts I
would like to start by making the
following statement nothing that would
be expressed to my speech should be
considered as a political opinion but
rather as neutral form of analysis so
the subject that I chose to talk about
in Miami throughout this conference
would be to show you our calm art is
political in so many different ways it
did the arts are often least perceived
because people don’t look at them
don’t sit back on message and and and
I’m sure meaning and rather look at them
in a very superficial manner I took two
about it with a friend of mine the other
day at a party he was telling me that he
didn’t really understand how come an
artwork that he considers beautiful can
be lets say estimated 1 million and how
come another artwork that according to
him is not that relevant can be
estimated more than 1 million because
this I’d point to him is not that
beautiful I don’t know maybe was saying
it in a very superficial way for the
simple reason that he was not
considering the colors the dimensions
the artists themselves and so many other
things that must be considered before
judging another work of art la serie
precook Chanel dilemma alone the art is
the shortest path from man to man that
is very light importable dermal hole we
can get that artist he narrates our
heritage that arts are and have always
been part of what makes our society and
they’re an integral part of what makes
mankind in fact every society starts to
decline at the exact moment when one is
satisfied by a form of constancy coming
from artistic disciplines and it’s true
when we think about it we started to
create art for a peculiar reason
education we say
cream ice for Italian studies for making
history and transmitting our knowledge
to the next generations but not only
have we used it for doing bats but we
have also used it for building our
offices for making our temples and other
places of worship and also for making
our grades there they are it has
flourished in so many different ways
through art architecture design fashion
and so many different but how come is it
political well in order to respond to
this question I have chosen three
different perspectives for the simple
reason that I consider that the
difference of meaning conveyed by an
artwork now and by the time of its
creation is really important the first
aid way that I will be talking about is
knowledge enjoyment the Quebec the
origin of the world which was played in
1866 and now is at the side of all at
the Musee d’Orsay in Paris so what can
we see by looking at this painting what
can we call see what could we consider
well now we could consider it as
feminist and it’s true to some extent it
is feminist I mean it diffuses any
various to gaze and the nature of the
painting itself as much as this title
our feminist it raises even a lot of
questions some could consider a
blasphemous since it considers that the
most carnal part of a woman’s body is
the origin of the world but the thing is
that we only get to know the real
meaning and the real political
connotation of this artwork when we when
we see that a lot of artists have been
very inspired by it the first of them is
the body habitus who has made a
performance
on the 29th of May 2014 at the Musee
d’Orsay
so basically what she’s done is she sat
in front of the painting legs might open
while showing her warmest color to the
visitors by repeating over and over
again
I am the origin I am
woman you didn’t see me I want you to
recognize me virgin like water creator
of sperm until of course the people from
the security sr22 kindly follow them
another artist has been very well
inspired by it
her name is Allah when she has created
nourishing then again the origin of the
word in 1989 and I would like to take
this opportunity to thank her for giving
us the rights for displaying her work so
the point of you all out there is quite
feminist for the simple reason that she
doesn’t consider it she must ask to ask
yourself questions about feminism and
she considered that which shouldn’t see
feminism’s anymore as a form of exact
opposite of what machismo is but rather
as a form of a gamete organism the main
reason why both of these artists have
been very inspired by longish enjoyment
of Kobe is because even though now are
we could consider that it is feminists
in reality it’s not a new poll appears
in this very anachronistic form of
masculine feminism Quebec only cuts the
body to present us a trunk there is none
of an identity represented there there’s
only a sex a simple piece of flesh and
this example exactly show us that we
have to be more critical with what we
consider as sometimes the rarity is
quite different it also shows us that
art never stops evolving with time and
that even centuries after the
realization of an artwork it’s a
political connotation what might have
changed which brings us to the second
dimension of my expose art is used as a
medium for conveying political ideas in
order to speak about that I will start
by speaking at the eighth form of art
which is forecasting so my question is
what has been the very first political
word while life
broadcasted events well it has been the
opening speech of the 1936 Olympic Games
Organising Berlin and made by no other
than adult feature it has also been the
very first television transmission that
has been powerful enough to escape into
outer space
what does that mean that means that if
there are other forms of life in our
universe the first images that they will
receive from us how those cleanly has
benefited from from this outbreak for
his propaganda and as Marshall McGinnis
Mike Leland says the artist will only be
too happy to abdicate the politician
will only be happy to abdicate in favor
of this image because his image will
will be way more powerful than it could
ever be so recasting is is therefore
used as a way as a medium for conveying
ideas but still cinema the movie the
interview has been released in 2014 it’s
an American spy comedy movie that where
you have to interviewers that get to
meet North Korea’s leader but or in the
same time as in the same time asked by
the CIA to assassinate him it has had
two very strong reactions the very first
one has been in June 2014 when North
Korea threatens actions against the
United States the second one has been
made by a hacker groups group called the
borders of peace who threatened to
action against Sony and Columbia
Pictures if the movie were to be
released there by Sony had kind of no
choice to to take it off from the US
market then the out words are often
political but so are the artists quite
often let’s talk about Charlie Chaplin a
little bit
you couldn’t have been it couldn’t have
taken part in a more political artwork
than the Great Dictator that was
released in 1945 especially considering
is very known final speech
let’s under McCarthyism in the 50s
everything has changed it did under
Marcus’s influence in the United States
a form of friction high period hunting
down all the people that were suspected
to be communists a lot of artists were
in between all of them engage in those
people arrested goaded Charlie Chaplin
as well as many other people has been
blacklisted from Hollywood and of course
forbidden to to appear there sweetheart
street art is without any doubt one of
the most political form of it exists
it’s often a rebellious it’s often
rebellious and it’s it expresses freedom
of speech freedom of expression what has
been used in the framework of the
northern islands conflicts that lasted
in the late 20th century for over 30
years the birth it it pitted the
unionist and an alliance there were many
Protestants against the Republicans and
nationalists there were many Catholics
the basis mules constitute one of the
strongest form of low propaganda in the
world and they have been denouncing all
of the variances that occurred there for
over 30 years which brings us to the
third dimension of my expose how calm
cultural sites can be centers of
political tensions in order to talk a
little bit about that I will start by
talking about the ancient city of
Palmyra so what is Palmyra it’s an
ancient city that that is composed of
many temples in other places of worship
each praising different cultures and
beliefs so you have temples celebrating
local dailies mr. Pugh Tom Ian Greek
Roman Arabic and carefully gods that
constitute this ancient city uh nests
made of cultural diversity the premiere
and has a very strong connotation in the
confrontation of globalization of our
extremism for the simple reason that in
May 2015
highest has taken over the place I have
started destroying it’s started
destroying the UNESCO World Heritage
Sites the Syrian army’s thanks to the
help of the Russians have also have
taken it back in March 2016 and Palmilla
has had a very strong other political
connotation at that moment on the 5th of
May 2016 when a concert was organized in
the middle of the ruins by the symphony
orchestra of st. Petersburg
unfortunately ever since December 2016
Isis has taken back Palmyra and that
keeps on destroying its artworks and
when they are not destroying it and
their artworks they are sending them in
order to finance themselves now what I
am going to talk a bit about the
Acropolis unfortunately the person in
Greece in Athens it has been built in
the mid 50 centuries before Christ in in
the celebration of of a victory against
the Persian Empire it has also been
built in order to to hold the treasury
of Italian league that here’s a lake an
association that was made in between all
of the Greek city-states that most of
these frescoes and
but mostly housed at the British Museum
and some of them are do the new food has
before appear to have much as political
tensions between the United Kingdom and
Greece and the daughter who is defending
pregnant and rhesus in Greece is a well
to name particular so what is art and
where did we find it well are we can
find in these cultures we can find it in
performances we can find it in paintings
we can play music in cinema in
broadcasting which invited everywhere
for the simple reason that art is
nothing besides a certain way of saying
well I want to know if you text
I hope that thanks to my speech you are
able to see that there is so much to
learn from ours and there’s so much
chatter nice I hope that you will be
more critical in more curious into the
future but looking at something and that
she will understand that there are
consequences that explain what you’re
doing and everyone on really sad
[Applause]
[Music]
you
Please follow and like us: