Press "Enter" to skip to content

Ignorance: Is It Really Bliss? A Deeper Analysis | Aidan Miller | TEDxValenciaHighSchool


hello my name is Aidan Miller and looks

give a great audience tonight what’s her

a round of applause all right so why am

I here let me give you some background

information

I have Asperger syndrome which is a form

of high-functioning autism what does

this mean it means I was born without

the ability to gauge normal social

expectations I actually had to be taken

out of class and schooled on basic

social functions it is how to make

friends hold an appropriate conversation

and vice-versa

I still struggle with some aspects of

the disorder it’s just failure to make

eye contact but of all the things I

learned these two are the most important

how to be empathetic and not be one side

in a conversation

I am sending here today because I hear

too often whether it be on the news of

some people off the distance fruitless

quarreling on philosophy and not a

simple light hearted disagreement but

bitter arguments that we people polarize

in the end not only is this

counterintuitive the way I was taught to

treat others I like to be treated but

it’s also propelled by destructive force

on his ignorance

I’m sending here today to help empower

you all with some tips to help suppress

this notion of ignorance and by no means

that perfect but I find that you helped

me in my day to day life so to start off

what is ignorance anyway well according

to the Oxford Dictionary ignorance is

the lack of knowledge information simple

enough right

well the Oxford Dictionary does a great

job at the finding what ignorance is we

need to further disambiguated to better

understand the problem at hand

so I’ve subdivided ignorant than two

different types direct and indirect

ignorance first is direct ignorant and

this is literally the Oblivion toward

the correct answer to a definitive

concept like mathematics are a foreign

language how do you overcome it easy you

just learn the concept simple enough

right

it gives a clear definite well-defined

concepts this comes an indirect ignorant

so this is where things get complex

it’s the oblivion toward the correct

answer to an indefinite concept although

Asafa code matters fall underneath this

type of ignorance questions like is it

right to abort a fetus or what’s the

ideal society or what’s the meaning of

life we all with this type of ignorance

each and every one of us not know the

Surefire 100% correct answer toward

concepts we’re indirectly ignorant

– as such it’s impossible to overcome

this type of ignorance but it seems like

we have in our own minds this is because

we come up with our own philosophies to

help compensate for this void in

knowledge your beliefs and ideologies

are all based on social constructs and

personal of experiences if you had in

the past this level personality is said

to be why it’s hard to change someone’s

opinions and keep in mind how I said

it’s only hard to but anyway these

compensations for indirect ignorance

vary from person to person that’s a very

diverse and definitive in our character

it’s what make each and every one of us

different now they’ve disambiguated

these two different types of ignorance

for you I want to ask you which one is

more destructive let’s take a few

it must be indirect ignorance right

never heard this saying better the devil

you know than the devil you don’t know

we as humans aren’t seen to be

uncomfortable what’s not familiar to us

our compensations for indirect ignorance

become our worlds and our outlooks on

life

likewise if someone were to come up to

you and challenge your beliefs they’d

appear to be wrong or even perverse from

their perspective then bitter hatred and

argument and polarization and so you try

to justify a seemingly correct concrete

answer to a concept which isn’t even

answerable in the first place so it must

be indirect ignorance right but it’s not

is it knowing that indefinite concepts

are an answerable definitive concept yes

it is and thirty recognizes principles

what enables indirect ignorance is

destructive ability because doing it

recognizes to be end up sparring one

another as if one compensation others

the correct one so how do we eliminate

this need to argue but the answer is we

can’t completely but we certainly can

channel it my tip to you is to avoid

argumentative debate as much as possible

because that assumes there’s a right or

wrong compensation just a note if these

tips took years to come to me they

should take seconds to come to you sit

down and converse with people with a

conflicting philosophies keeping in mind

their views will disagree with yours

take turns giving of your views in

different subjects ask them how you

think but they think what they think and

you may become more wise in a subject

being able to

from different perspective because

remember how I said that our opinions

are based on our own personal

experiences if we could ask why you

think what you think giving honest

answer and if you don’t know to say

that’s how I think because you do have a

reason why you think what you think it

just may be subconscious I don’t know

maybe just me saying we shouldn’t argue

because argumentative behavior a

non-violent sense can be a beneficial

thing in fact recently I saw a TED talk

with dr. Daniel Cohen about the benefits

of argumentative behavior well have no

fear

a man by the name of Socrates came up

with a method of constructively arguing

known as this is known as the Socratic

method 2500 years ago it’s basically a

form of organized debate but much more

effective than a traditional argument of

war and that it promotes critical

thinking they’re asking questions

furthermore through the cooperation that

do the cooperation it embraces it also

provokes critical thinking and a

possible revelation of a new concept

everybody said it’s hard to change

someone yes it’s hard to change someone

but not impossible and with a Socratic

method it holds a much greater potential

to do so than a traditional argument so

what I’ve done here is I’ve empowered

you all with means to help defect defend

yourself against direct ignorant son

indirect ignorance I encourage you to

set a positive example by using these

tips I just provided to you and chill

this form of direct ignorance and

hopefully others will follow suit with you thank you very much

Please follow and like us: