[Music]
we are sure that the only price
that we pay to use the mobile phone is the
flat rate
Spain is the country that has the most users
of the mobile phone together with singapore
approximately 92% of the population
has at least one mobile phone and
there are 120 lines for every 100
users
therefore we are even by
above the states in which the
mobile only have 90 percent of the
population in united states
precisely in michigan a judge has
sentenced to 110 years in prison to a
person Mr. carpenter that we’re going
to talk because he got involved in four
robberies to four shopping centers
precisely because of a piece of information that was
this mobile phone of your mobile phone
was the geolocation had the bad
lucky that the fbi geo located his
mobile in four moments in which
was producing four of the 16
robberies that were being played
precisely at that time the lawyer or
indignant in court and appealed
before the appeal circuit and alleged
that according to the fourth amendment of the
Constitution of the United States
you can not get information from a
personal record
if there is no order from a judge and there is no
however the response was that
gave the court of appeal was nobody
forces him to have a mobile
if you want it does not geolocate you in
and that you do not take out data that you do not
he used a mobile phone
the question is more rather that we are
willing or could today to
live without the technologies but mobile
the five companies that make the most money
invoice this year in 2017 the five are
American and the five are engaged
to the world of telecommunication and
technology are no longer the big
oil companies are no longer big
builders therefore oil
brick today is nothing more than
the data and the subject is that the data is
we give them we ask ourselves which one
that we fill out a form
terms clauses that we put each
Once we register a note
we do not put a social network to
work really we are we are
aware that we are giving something
we do not want to give it because it has been done
a test and the average term of time
that it takes to read the clauses and
terms to accept the consent
when you join a mobile social network
it’s 40 minutes you know what it takes
give the tic and say accept let me
rolls 8 seconds
there has been a gambling company
American that between the conditions
and terms to accept being able to play that
game
I asked to give up your weapon your immortal soul
well, 88 percent of the
people said take my soul but let
stop playing in europe
the most visited websites know the
average number of cookies that have captures
and data sensors
35 average cookies for each of
your web pages that we see and that you do not
we know that they are spying on us at the same time
that we are seeing one more thing
surprising 2020 is to say within two
years there will be 50 billion
I repeat 50,000 million devices
connected to the internet on the internet
things so the sum of the
capture of the data they get to
through these devices plus the
sensors being imposed more
processors that are capable of swallowing
those big data that huge amount of
data and draw conclusions as the
end the consequences that they know more about
us than ourselves because
study our behavior patterns and
all the technological traces that we’re going
leaving and they become knowledgeable
from us better than ourselves
what data are obtained in papyrus
High standard handles have a name and
national and language surnames do not have
relational data with which we
we relate leisure data has other
of our health has ideological data
religious politicians etc I do you for
they have the data of yesterday those of now and
those of tomorrow because they are able to read
what we put in our people what
let’s do or have our
self-censorship
everything we have thrown in the bin and
we have deleted is what we
self-censorship with which they can
work on the perspective of many
data or two data that are very scary
image not our normal image the
family image the image
sexual our image in general the
strength of the photo and geolocation and
If they do not tell the poor carpenter
who is now in jail in michigan
because he had the bad luck that the
aegean located those four points so
dangerous
I do not care about that, it seems very
well the technology is presented to me what
What worries me is that this capture of
data and what can be done with them
It can affect our privacy to
our privacy to our sameness to
our dignity to our reputation at
control of the data that should be
own control who is the owner of
the data because the beginning to me
they had said that the data is yours
it may be that it will control all but I
I think we have lost control of
your data every time we have had a
socially dangerous situation of
man has been able to react and by
so I’m not afraid of the present in
all the transformations that when the
absolute monarchy and it was what he did
the French revolution established
finally a very important solution
was the table of rights
fundamentals of man and citizen
then the constitution came
American that implemented more than
they metals the Russian revolution and
after the sad and huge wars
that they gave world with many
dead and that in general the UN does not
we were able to establish the letter of
social rights and rights that at
both put a red line in front of
state
therefore I am almost convinced that no
it’s a matter of being afraid is the
solution that I come to propose here is not
an involutionist solution to return to
past and leave things like this
technology has come to stay and
it’s very good it ‘s irreversible is
unrenounceable
the proposal that I come to do is
well let’s move forward with technology
logically but let’s humanize it
it’s very good the connectivity is very
well the gratuity is very well the
speed of communications the world
of opportunities that technology
gives on all fronts but what if
besides that we implement humanity
that we implement sameness we implement
respect for him because he is no longer a
merchandise for these companies so
great that the only thing that see us is a
source of data collection but
we are not merchandise we have
won
we are beings
a soul we are human beings and so
so much the answer that I come to
Propose them with technology
just mosley something very human that
is the right know that the story is
repeat and also give an example very very
Spanish that the pioneers will keep
they believe with right those who arrive first
something a phenomenon we are now of the
digital pioneers believe they have the right
to self-regulate how is the world what
they just invented them the Spaniards
we conquer American we distribute
america after the wild was divided
West
then the gold rush australia and
now they are dividing Antarctica and
tomorrow the moon and Mars will be divided and
it seems that the Roman principle will follow
of the first that arrives is the first
stays with things the first try
By e
bottiglieri lliure and I what I propose
is that this changes because
necessarily get the first one to a
site gives you powers that you have to
distribute with others and also ask for a
change
secondly also an urgency is
true that we think that slavery does not
is going to be able to open we can still
think that women do not charge the same
for doing the same job in all
parts of the world although in principle
he has already won the right to vote but in
some countries even still you
allows you to drive therefore there is a lot
that changing the problem is not that
let’s know what we have to change of
plans that we change it already because if
we wait for many centuries to pass
this is going to be very long and therefore
what I propose is more technology but
more controlled more humanized with the
right and not just economic norms
It is very good to advocate free
competition to do away with these
oligopolies of these digital pioneers
but also legal solutions
important so from here we go to
promote a group creating a
Expert group of all orders
other jurists but also politicians
ethical sociologists, physical, economists
that we try to do something that is very
difficult and is that in such a world
globalized in which there are 200 and peak
countries where there are 200 and peak
legal systems
where there are hundred-odd languages
how are we going to humanize and how are we going to
look for that lowest common denominator of
rights that allow that while
technology advances those rights
enter into that technology and humanize
and in me it occurs to me that that table then
is formed by the right to oblivion
is formed by the right to have
machines leave me alone and leave me
occasionally disconnect them
I ask for the right to the traces
technological I’m leaving all the
days at all times do not come
when is the future to remember the
past
I ask the right those and the authentic
owner and not because there is or not a
consent but the authentic owner
of the data and that the data is transferred if I
I leave and if not
and let me revoke with feelings
I can give the right to have
technological accessibility since nobody
of blackmail for economic reasons to
give me not certain possibilities of
connectivity but the right to be able
use that data but for defense
social to help fight the
terrorism to fight crime is
definitive and that when tomorrow
ask me what is the price you are
paying for the mobile phone arrives
exclusively the rate and not my
human rights
nothing more and thank you very much
[Applause]
we are sure that the only price
that we pay to use the mobile phone is the
flat rate
Spain is the country that has the most users
of the mobile phone together with singapore
approximately 92% of the population
has at least one mobile phone and
there are 120 lines for every 100
users
therefore we are even by
above the states in which the
mobile only have 90 percent of the
population in united states
precisely in michigan a judge has
sentenced to 110 years in prison to a
person Mr. carpenter that we’re going
to talk because he got involved in four
robberies to four shopping centers
precisely because of a piece of information that was
this mobile phone of your mobile phone
was the geolocation had the bad
lucky that the fbi geo located his
mobile in four moments in which
was producing four of the 16
robberies that were being played
precisely at that time the lawyer or
indignant in court and appealed
before the appeal circuit and alleged
that according to the fourth amendment of the
Constitution of the United States
you can not get information from a
personal record
if there is no order from a judge and there is no
however the response was that
gave the court of appeal was nobody
forces him to have a mobile
if you want it does not geolocate you in
and that you do not take out data that you do not
he used a mobile phone
the question is more rather that we are
willing or could today to
live without the technologies but mobile
the five companies that make the most money
invoice this year in 2017 the five are
American and the five are engaged
to the world of telecommunication and
technology are no longer the big
oil companies are no longer big
builders therefore oil
brick today is nothing more than
the data and the subject is that the data is
we give them we ask ourselves which one
that we fill out a form
terms clauses that we put each
Once we register a note
we do not put a social network to
work really we are we are
aware that we are giving something
we do not want to give it because it has been done
a test and the average term of time
that it takes to read the clauses and
terms to accept the consent
when you join a mobile social network
it’s 40 minutes you know what it takes
give the tic and say accept let me
rolls 8 seconds
there has been a gambling company
American that between the conditions
and terms to accept being able to play that
game
I asked to give up your weapon your immortal soul
well, 88 percent of the
people said take my soul but let
stop playing in europe
the most visited websites know the
average number of cookies that have captures
and data sensors
35 average cookies for each of
your web pages that we see and that you do not
we know that they are spying on us at the same time
that we are seeing one more thing
surprising 2020 is to say within two
years there will be 50 billion
I repeat 50,000 million devices
connected to the internet on the internet
things so the sum of the
capture of the data they get to
through these devices plus the
sensors being imposed more
processors that are capable of swallowing
those big data that huge amount of
data and draw conclusions as the
end the consequences that they know more about
us than ourselves because
study our behavior patterns and
all the technological traces that we’re going
leaving and they become knowledgeable
from us better than ourselves
what data are obtained in papyrus
High standard handles have a name and
national and language surnames do not have
relational data with which we
we relate leisure data has other
of our health has ideological data
religious politicians etc I do you for
they have the data of yesterday those of now and
those of tomorrow because they are able to read
what we put in our people what
let’s do or have our
self-censorship
everything we have thrown in the bin and
we have deleted is what we
self-censorship with which they can
work on the perspective of many
data or two data that are very scary
image not our normal image the
family image the image
sexual our image in general the
strength of the photo and geolocation and
If they do not tell the poor carpenter
who is now in jail in michigan
because he had the bad luck that the
aegean located those four points so
dangerous
I do not care about that, it seems very
well the technology is presented to me what
What worries me is that this capture of
data and what can be done with them
It can affect our privacy to
our privacy to our sameness to
our dignity to our reputation at
control of the data that should be
own control who is the owner of
the data because the beginning to me
they had said that the data is yours
it may be that it will control all but I
I think we have lost control of
your data every time we have had a
socially dangerous situation of
man has been able to react and by
so I’m not afraid of the present in
all the transformations that when the
absolute monarchy and it was what he did
the French revolution established
finally a very important solution
was the table of rights
fundamentals of man and citizen
then the constitution came
American that implemented more than
they metals the Russian revolution and
after the sad and huge wars
that they gave world with many
dead and that in general the UN does not
we were able to establish the letter of
social rights and rights that at
both put a red line in front of
state
therefore I am almost convinced that no
it’s a matter of being afraid is the
solution that I come to propose here is not
an involutionist solution to return to
past and leave things like this
technology has come to stay and
it’s very good it ‘s irreversible is
unrenounceable
the proposal that I come to do is
well let’s move forward with technology
logically but let’s humanize it
it’s very good the connectivity is very
well the gratuity is very well the
speed of communications the world
of opportunities that technology
gives on all fronts but what if
besides that we implement humanity
that we implement sameness we implement
respect for him because he is no longer a
merchandise for these companies so
great that the only thing that see us is a
source of data collection but
we are not merchandise we have
won
we are beings
a soul we are human beings and so
so much the answer that I come to
Propose them with technology
just mosley something very human that
is the right know that the story is
repeat and also give an example very very
Spanish that the pioneers will keep
they believe with right those who arrive first
something a phenomenon we are now of the
digital pioneers believe they have the right
to self-regulate how is the world what
they just invented them the Spaniards
we conquer American we distribute
america after the wild was divided
West
then the gold rush australia and
now they are dividing Antarctica and
tomorrow the moon and Mars will be divided and
it seems that the Roman principle will follow
of the first that arrives is the first
stays with things the first try
By e
bottiglieri lliure and I what I propose
is that this changes because
necessarily get the first one to a
site gives you powers that you have to
distribute with others and also ask for a
change
secondly also an urgency is
true that we think that slavery does not
is going to be able to open we can still
think that women do not charge the same
for doing the same job in all
parts of the world although in principle
he has already won the right to vote but in
some countries even still you
allows you to drive therefore there is a lot
that changing the problem is not that
let’s know what we have to change of
plans that we change it already because if
we wait for many centuries to pass
this is going to be very long and therefore
what I propose is more technology but
more controlled more humanized with the
right and not just economic norms
It is very good to advocate free
competition to do away with these
oligopolies of these digital pioneers
but also legal solutions
important so from here we go to
promote a group creating a
Expert group of all orders
other jurists but also politicians
ethical sociologists, physical, economists
that we try to do something that is very
difficult and is that in such a world
globalized in which there are 200 and peak
countries where there are 200 and peak
legal systems
where there are hundred-odd languages
how are we going to humanize and how are we going to
look for that lowest common denominator of
rights that allow that while
technology advances those rights
enter into that technology and humanize
and in me it occurs to me that that table then
is formed by the right to oblivion
is formed by the right to have
machines leave me alone and leave me
occasionally disconnect them
I ask for the right to the traces
technological I’m leaving all the
days at all times do not come
when is the future to remember the
past
I ask the right those and the authentic
owner and not because there is or not a
consent but the authentic owner
of the data and that the data is transferred if I
I leave and if not
and let me revoke with feelings
I can give the right to have
technological accessibility since nobody
of blackmail for economic reasons to
give me not certain possibilities of
connectivity but the right to be able
use that data but for defense
social to help fight the
terrorism to fight crime is
definitive and that when tomorrow
ask me what is the price you are
paying for the mobile phone arrives
exclusively the rate and not my
human rights
nothing more and thank you very much
[Applause]
Please follow and like us: