Press "Enter" to skip to content

“COMBATTING NATIONALISM BY LOVING AMERICA” | Naya Chang | TEDxMountainViewHighSchool


[Applause]

so fourth grade was the Native Americans

were killed by Spanish settlers and

fifth grade was Native Americans were

killed by English settlers and sixth

grade was slavery and seventh grade with

Yellow Peril in eighth grade was

Jefferson raped his slaves and Lincoln

was a racist and Jim Crow and KKK and

police raids on Stonewall and interment

camps and nuclear bombs so this is the

same my elementary education did not

glorify the United States right but this

is also to say that instead of being

disheartened by what I learned in my

American history classes I somehow

emerge from eighth grade I was 13 years

old thinking I love this subject so much

I want to be teaching it someday this is

true now I’ve heard few people of my

generation expressed similar sentiment a

similar degree of love for United States

as I’ve said education has not spared us

the details of past atrocities right so

we’re well aware of those and we were

able to view the current events that are

going on in a raw and often politically

liberal light right so as we see this

prevailing inequality and we see it kept

in place by social norms and crass

political administrations it would seem

almost ignorant to showcase American

pride and this has led me to wonder in

the crudest terms

is it possible today for a

self-respecting not Trump supporting

person to say they love America

now the short answer is yes right

exhibit a being myself but the longer

answer is that as this post 9/11 trump

era version of American nationalism

picks up steam it becomes less and less

possible to identify as a strong

believer in American ideals without also

implying you support a movement

synonymous with bigotry and chaos right

and as I’ve said in the San Francisco

Bay Area which is where I’ve lived my

whole life my peers realized that the

America that nationalists Revere is one

that glosses over the country’s crimes

one that promotes an agenda for the

white majority so we end up grappling

with how we can live in a country of

numerous sins

among these people these nationalists

who attempt to ignore them now observed

illness accumulates into kind of a

verbal backlash against America by my

generation in the form of kind of a

spoken disassociation with American

history with a current American culture

discernible during class discussions

which from my experience can go like

this so a person will say like the

founding fathers are racists or America

always a presence minorities are like

white people what are they doing like I

don’t I don’t get it and the person kind

of sits back in his or her chair like

the discussion has been started and

wrapped up in a single comment and

fellow classmates like not in general

consensus not like yeah like this is why

I come to school these are the

conversations that no no right and too

often have I listened to my classmates

denounced the United States in 30

seconds and too often have I been one of

those contributing voices because the

way I see it is that the amount of

terrible things that happened in our

past it’s daunting right but the

matter-of-fact way in which we can say

Oh founding fathers are racist or

America always oppresses minorities

reflects a massive degree of flippancy

for both the legitimacy of the claim

being made and anything positive the

country could stand for right and I get

why we do this with nationalists

preaching America’s and culturally

superior Haven for white people my

generation seeks to shoot off in the

opposite direction right but to prove we

don’t agree with bigotry is not to be

absolved of responsibility using blanket

condemnation to disassociate ourselves

with fundamental American flaws does not

make up for the fact that fundamental

problems still exist so real quick I

corroborated this tendency to

disassociate with an informal poll so I

pulled 200-mile View High School

students with a survey that I made based

on a study by two professors from

Harvard and NYU and pretty much with

those professors

they analyze data from the General

Social Survey which is a widely

referenced sociological survey and they

separated respondents into four

categories now these four categories had

to do with the relationship and

individual can have to the United States

and they range from our net nationalists

to disengaged

now the ardent nationalist exhibited the

characteristics you would probably

associate with nationalism which would

be high amounts of pride and being

American and a very strict criteria for

who else can be considered American and

will see the disengaged exhibited the

opposite now I predicted based on my

classroom observations that the

responses of my peers would reveal their

views to be most closely similar to the

disengaged

end of the spectrum and we’ll see this

proved true we can see this in a couple

ways one is that my peers respondents

very few of them felt very close to the

United States and just like how the

Nationalists felt this is the

demographics of the nationalist or sorry

the disengaged and Mountview high school

respondents are much more similar than

either of them are to the other end of

the spectrum and also very few of my

respondents believed in any statements

that show strict membership criteria so

this would be something like to be a

true American you need to have been born

in the United States you need to be a US

citizen and things like this and I bring

up these statistics just to draw a

similarity between the disengaged and my

Mountain View High School respondents

and I draw the similarity because if we

look back on the professor’s study the

disengaged respondents while claiming

the lowest amount of pride in America

and lowest identity with America also

reported the highest support for

principles like immigration for legal

protection for minorities for these

principles that are increasingly talked

about that I feel like generally my

generation here would support and these

things that I believe should define

America right but isn’t it interesting

that a group of Americans who believe in

following the inclusive values that have

made our country so diverse is also a

group that see

relatively anti-patriotic you know would

it not be contradictory to claim belief

and some of these American values but

then not claim belief in America and

again I want to reiterate that why it’s

understandable that we might ask

ourselves you know why should we believe

in America when we look in the past and

we see this terrible things when we look

in the present and we see these terrible

things but I would argue that if we

embrace a standard that we want for

America you need to embrace the country

as well to help it realize and reach

that standard right people are behind

progress that like plot of land can’t

change itself and I would say that we

can set an achieve a standard because

alongside the terrible and shameful

truths I’ve learned since fourth grade I

learned principles that most Americans

can unemotionally recite right freedom

of expression and democracy where all of

aged citizens can vote hardwork leading

to opportunity these things we take for

granted right but really really do

define America in a positive way right

these are positive things and be in a

distinct way even if we’re not as unique

as some nationalists would have us

believe right so I feel like we need to

realize that there is a way to reject

the beliefs of bigoted nationalism and

still express love for a country right

love for a country that’s imperfect but

has a good foundation you know I saw

legal institutions that rejected

progress at one point in time but later

turns such as in the case of same-sex

marriage I saw a constitution that was

written by slaveholding white men yes

but slaveholding white men who are now

less important and less alive than this

population right and no matter who wrote

the Constitution no matter what

prejudices they held if we today wanted

to argue that America inherently

supports equality our founding documents

would support us on equivocally right

while disavowing those who would argue

that the United States is only open to a

space

thick-set of people and something I like

to think about when I am discouraged by

the nationalist movement when I feel

like if I’m discouraged then immigrants

hoping for better lives must surely be

discouraged is I think of ghosts our

Father Kizer Khan and what he says to

these conflicted Muslim immigrants is

show me where in the Constitution the

United States is against Islam and then

he says that such a clause doesn’t exist

because these discriminatory nativist

and nationalists they don’t have

leverage right the things they advocate

for are not written into these American

doctrines and of course the country is

composed of more than value stated on

paper but I would say that the fact that

most much in my generation can find

issue with nationalism already shows

that there is hope for a more tolerant

future right but I think we need to take

the next step as I said realize that

there’s a way to reject the beliefs of

bigoted nationalism and still express

love for a country right and if you want

a definition for non nationalistic pride

you can take Dan Rather’s definition of

patriotism which is patriotism it’s a

dialogue about what you love about your

country but also about how it can be

improved a big part of being a young

person and I speak specifically to

self-respecting non Trump supporters in

my in this area I feel like is realizing

the United States is not finished you

know we don’t need to make it great

again because we need to make it great

for the future right it’s the American

experiment because it’s not over yet and

we can realize that when we commit to

being American we’re not committing to

defending the founding fathers hypocricy

we’re not committing to defending our

stiff immigration policy we’re not

committing to defending any chauvinistic

social norms or punitive political

legislation right but we are committing

to upholding the American dream and to

do this through maintaining tolerance

instead of condemning others when they

do not they’re not cynically stating

during class discussions maybe that

nativist and nationalist tendency have

wrecked opportunity through ending

conversations just like

casual conversations with something

better than dude Americans because it’s

a really easy end to a conversation I

know I’ve had way too many of those and

while acknowledging that my extreme

optimism about this country has so much

to do with my extreme privilege I don’t

think it’s ignorant to believe the

American Dream is real I think it is

dangerous to believe that it’s not and

I’m a third generation korean-american

and I have been advised on several

occasions to learn my real culture it’s

not a racist dig it’s usually from my

well-meaning peers but it’s sort of a

way to suggest I disassociate myself

with American culture right investing

some sort of get out of jail free card

so that whenever an event occurs that

goes against my liberal values I can

somehow prove that like this isn’t me

but I’ve never considered doing this and

nobody should feel I’ll ever feel

obligated to because I would rather

think of myself as a full American with

all the terms fluctuating implications

than to duck out right when the country

doesn’t go in the direction that I wish

for it so I’ve come to the conclusion

that yes it is possible today for a

self-respecting non Trump supporting

person to say they love America we just

have to realize that loving any country

requires a degree of humility and only

after we distinguish between what it

means to be a nationalist and what it

means to love a country can we choose

the latter to move forward and make

America truly great thank you [Applause]

Please follow and like us: