Press "Enter" to skip to content

Antarctica: The ice cube at the bottom of the planet | Gary Wilson | TEDxScottBase


hi folks hey welcome to Scott bass

I’ve been undertaking research in

Antarctica now for nearly 30 years so

I’ve seen a few changes and perhaps the

most dramatic though are the increasing

complexity of the scientific questions

being asked by the scientists themselves

and the advances in technology and skill

to answer those questions and indeed the

degree of collaboration that’s now

required to answer some of those really

complex scientific questions my own

interest in Antarctica began with a

fairly rudimentary epiphany as an

undergraduate geology major and that was

that an ice cube on the bottom of the

world was not going to be very

compatible with a warming planet it had

to melt and if it did where did all that

water go and it’s a pretty significant

Ice Cube 26 quadrillion tons that’s 26

thousand million million for those of

you who are counting the zeroes and

that’s enough to raise sea level around

the globe by as much as 60 meters so I

started looking through the geological

record for evidence of past intervals of

warmth and higher sea level the journey

took me around New Zealand to South

America and of course here in Antarctica

and turned out not to be a very quick

job so I’ve teamed up with a lot of

people along the way and we’ve unearthed

evidence from beneath Antarctica’s ice

sheets and oceans that indicate past

intervals of warmth one of the

challenges of working here in Antarctica

is that evidence is hard to find

it’s either under the ice or under the

water around Antarctica but along the

way we’ve unearthed quite a lot about

this continent it’s ice sheets have

expanded and retreated on a periodic

basis as the planet has

and warmed and the ice sheets changed

more dramatically than you might expect

just a few degrees of warming of the

planet results in loss of between two

and twenty percent of Antarctica’s ice

sheets that’s partly because warming of

the planet is not uniform the poles tend

to warm at more than double the average

rate and think on this a meter of sea

level rise comes from only two percent

change in the Antarctic ice sheet in a

meter of sea level rise displaces a

hundred million people around the planet

now when Antarctica’s ice sheets cool

and expand and retreat the ocean follows

suit that’s because Antarctica is

cooling the ocean in driving ocean

circulation and atmosphere and climate

follows as well because the temperature

gradient from the equator to the pole

causes atmosphere to reorganize it turns

out that Antarctic has this huge

flywheel that translates just small

changes in warmth of the planet into

significant global changes in

circulation sea level and climate no

matter how you look at it small changes

in Antarctica have big impact on the

rest of the planet obviously the ice

sheets have a great deal of inertia so

you might think that these changes are

slow but it turns out from the

geological evidence not to be the case

as the earth warmed out of the last

glaciation between 10,000 and 20,000

years ago it did so in a stepwise

fashion long intervals of relatively

stable or slowly changing climate and

sea level punctuated by significant

episodes of melt with sea level rising

by as much as four metres per hundred

years in some of those

intervals of melt the other thing we’ve

learned along the way is that past

levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide and

the atmosphere have a huge effect on the

planet low levels of atmospheric carbon

dioxide result in relatively stable ice

sheets high levels of atmospheric carbon

dioxide less stable ice sheets the

Antarctic ice sheets have varied between

200 and 300 parts per million the ice

sheets have grown and retreated on a

periodic basis but 400 parts per million

seems to be a critical threshold above

that the geological record reveals

significant loss in the Antarctic Ice

Sheet and sea level rise as much as 10

metres and above 500 parts per million

as much as 20 meters rise in global sea

level so as the earth passed through 400

parts per million atmospheric carbon

dioxide a year or so ago at a rate not

previously seen in the geological record

we were left wondering how long would it

take for Antarctica and its ice sheets

to catch up the risk here is not in what

we know it’s in what we don’t know the

knowledge gap leads to uncertainty and

that uncertainty makes it difficult for

us to develop plans or take action it’s

further exacerbated by the potential

enormity of Antarctic as impact on the

globe but challenges only seem enormous

when we don’t know the pathway through

mountains our unscalable until someone

works out how to get to the top so what

we’re talking about here is the unknown

pathway the geological record has a

fairly low resolution we we have a

pretty good

where the system will come into

equilibrium as the planet warms what we

don’t know is the pathway to get there

the steps the thresholds the changes in

right on our way to a warming planet

now obviously solving this problem can

be done pretty easily if we develop a

comprehensive understanding of the ocean

ice climate system here in Antarctica

but we can make significant progress

around the edges where different parts

of the system come into contact we’re

Antarctica connects with the southern

ocean where the ocean connects with the

ice and where the atmosphere connects

with the ocean and the ice at the edges

we can learn about how one part of the

system drives change in another part of

the system at the edges we can learn how

indicative change in one part of the

system might be of the system of a whole

it’s pretty easy to fall into the trap

of observable change in one part of the

system driving our whole understanding

of the whole system

take for example growing ice sea ice

around Antarctica it may well indicate a

calling continent but not if the source

of the sea ice is the melting fresh

water from beneath

Antarctica’s ice shelves I’ve undertaken

quite a lot of work in the geological

record using sediment cores and the

whole aim of that has been about trying

to understand the rates of change and

trying to bring down their resolution of

understanding of the geological record

it turns out to be a pretty complex

system but one thing I’ve learned from

my geological training and that is that

past life is indicative of ocean and

climate condition change in environment

changes the life now on long timescales

species come and go but on shorter time

scales populations move and population

health changes the life integrates

across the environment

and the life integrates through time so

life is indicative of trend rather than

variability in the system what do I mean

by trend and variability

well variability is the backwards and

forwards the natural backwards and

forwards in the system about an average

state and trend is change in that

average state if we pick up well it

takes a lot to measure the difference

between Ted trend and variability a lot

of measurements through quite a period

of time if we pick up a change in trend

then we need to be able to attribute it

to a cause that way we can work out

what’s driving the system and the change

now if we take a whole of ecosystem

approach we can do that and that’s

because species in one part of the

ecosystem respond to different parts of

the environment that way you can work

out what’s driving change in your

ecosystem now one thing I’m working on

at the moment is trying to piece

together the modern change in Antarctica

from a series of long-term ecological

research and monitoring points around

Antarctica to try and pick up that

modern change and one place we’re

interested in is Cape adir some 700

kilometers north of here that’s got base

it’s pretty close to the Southern Ocean

at the northern edge of the Ross Sea

it’s also home to the largest Adelie

penguin rookery in Antarctica somewhere

upwards of a million birds and offshore

there are kelp forests not seen further

south here in the Ross Sea and at first

glance the water column seems to be an

extension of the southern ocean on to

the Antarctic shelf so it’s a great spot

to pick up the influence of the Southern

Ocean and

Antarctica it’s also one of the few

points in mainland Antarctica that

extend into the newly agreed raw sea

marine protected area so again another

spot to get some baseline understanding

of ecosystem health it’s a difficult

place to get to no one will argue with

that

but it’s an important place to

understand the impact of warming in the

southern ocean into Antarctica another

place that’s important to look at is the

sub-antarctic islands around the

northern perimeter of the Antarctic

circumpolar current with their own

iconic species that are also responding

to environmental but change but in this

case propagating north out of Antarctica

to the rest of the world so can we

actually do anything about this

obviously we need to solve this

knowledge gap to be able to make

informed decisions and do something more

about our future but you know we can

actually act on what we already know we

know that the planet is warming year

upon year we know that atmospheric

carbon dioxide levels and other

greenhouse gases have contributed to

that warming over the past few years

atmospheric co2 is increasing it 1/2 to

1% per annum so surely it’s possible to

turn that around 1/2 to 1% and we can

all do something about that it’s going

to be made a lot easier if we understand

more about our own carbon footprint what

it is that we use what it is that we’re

buying that contributes to this increase

in carbon dioxide that’s what the carbon

trading system was all about trying to

work out the origin of our carbon and

where it ended up in the atmosphere but

the reality is we all need to do some

saving that’s what the discussion in

Paris was about so we’re talking about

it we’re just not quite doing it yet

there’s a bit of a standoff here between

governments and individuals as

individuals we kind of rely on

government to have these big questions

sorted out in a plan in hand but the

government of the day is concerned with

the issues of the individuals today

that’s why they get elected and that’s

why they stay elected so we’re waiting

for government and they’re waiting for

us

let’s break the cycle that’s what the

New Zealand enteric Research Institute

is all about brokering a public-private

partnership to undertake research on

some of these more challenging questions

that transcend geopolitical boundaries

that’s the problem with climate change

no one country is going to solve it on

its own it’s going to take each and

every one of us to make a difference

together thank you you

Please follow and like us: