
Dehida is a modern French intellectual
One of the most famous and controversial figures
He pioneered deconstruction
Fundamentally change our understanding of many academic fields
Especially literary studies.
Dehida was born in the suburbs of Algeria in 1930 and was a French colony at the time.
He was born in a Jewish family and his father is a member of a local wine merchant.
His learning started slowly and he dreamed of becoming a professional football player.
In 1942, a new law was enacted by the French Vichy regime.
Jewish children like Dehida are forcibly excluded from public secondary schools.
Most of his time and his mother stayed at home.
Because of the large Muslim population in Algeria, he is excluded by many anti-Semitism.
And left a deep mark on the inferior experience
Three different religions
Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all claim to be truth
But don’t know how to treat other beliefs with respect
In 1949, Dehida was just 19 years old and went to the Paris Normal School.
He is an excellent student but in a strange position
He is very good at education.
But as a Jew, it is completely marginalized in the French metropolis.
Although Dehida is not a biographer
It is hard to read his work and not to be paranoid and repulsive to him.
Since 1960, Dehida has begun to have a famous idea.
As time progressed, he became a famous intellectual in Europe and America.
He is very tasteful about his clothes and hairstyle, and looks glamorous.
He has a rich and complex history of love
In 1980, he was arrested on suspicion of smuggling drugs.
But supported by the French president and politicians from the left and right
He likes to play snooker, most of the afternoon is playing
Even technical demonstrations
He died of pancreatic cancer at the age of 74 in 2004.
Dehida wrote 40 books, esoteric and subtle
But his importance to us can be revealed through the three verification methods that are often used.
Deconstruction, defamation, and logocentrism.
Behind the exaggerated vocabulary, there are some very important ideas buried.
Deconstruction is the most commonly used noun to connect with Dehida.
It is described as the way he thinks
But when others start using this method, he often feels
They misunderstood what he meant
Deconstruction dismantling our over-loyalty to any idea
And learn to explore the other side buried in truth.
In 1967, Dehida published his first important book: “Thesis”
The subject of its disclosure is rather strange, even boring
Dehida believes that Western philosophers since Socrates
Organized speech, regarded as true communication
Deprecated text is simply a tool for recording spoken speech
Lack of real feedback from conversations
It’s almost impossible to feel an important issue.
But Deschida’s plays are derived from the concept he developed.
His primary ambition is to promote this broad claim.
But once we start to look closely, almost all thinking is full of falsehood
There is one thing that goes beyond another. This is unreasonable and unhelpful.
Speech is better than writing
Reason overcomes passion
Men are better than women anyway
Text is better than picture
Vision is better than touch
Dehida’s focus is on the advantages and values we have not seen.
Not so much that Dehida is nihilism, everything is worthless.
He stressed
The other side that we ignore is worthy of being loved and concerned.
In his 40 books, Dehida deconstructed a series of key binary terms.
Rational relative sensibility, men versus women, utilitarian relative generosity, high culture and relatively vulgar culture
He hopes that we can learn a smarter lifestyle.
Under these conflicts
We can take a look at both aspects
Both of them are a little wrong, both need each other, between tense relationships
Will necessarily prove to be indispensable
It seems that Dehida seems to always attack the tradition with deconstruction.
And free market, promoting leftist egalitarianism
But it is a wonderful idea
For example, in the deconstruction of his concept of equality,
Dehida suggested that equality is always better than inequality.
Although equality may be the modern freedom truth
But in fact it is uncertain and unclear
He takes some outstanding people we know as an example.
Derrida is a devout professor and father.
Well-managed students and teachers, children and parents
Deconstruction should show that it is confusing and has the drawback of having logical defects
Moreover, we must always keep in mind its confusion
Derrida criticizes people tend to imagine, behind every problem
Have correct and suitable answers
We offer life that is destined to live without a clear answer.
And the desire for him is the root of our problems.
He wants to correct our original simple love
Let us have the wisdom of immortality and be more comfortable
For example, he believes that we may naturally be confused about the advantages of capitalism and socialism.
Or the relationship between love and sex, but we should not rush to the conclusions around these topics.
Useful things are on both sides of these equations
To conclude that capitalism is either splendid or sinful, or that love and sex are either
Very close contact or have nothing to do with each other
In order to avoid the ever-changing nature of fraud and reality.
Confusion and conceptual uncertainty around it
Not a sign of weakness or stupidity. This is the central symbol of Derrida’s maturity.
Derrida’s strategy is to beautify the situation and give it a positive ring.
That’s why he brought it back to use a beautiful Greek word:
Oh, it means deadlock or confusion.
He proposed that we should be proud of the right to know and the status of regular visits.
The world of Derrida is confusing and suspicious, not a dead end.
They are just evidence of adulthood in the heart.
The chief goal of a Derrida’s criticism is to call him a way of logocentrism.
Through his understanding of impatience, innocent and rational, logical and clear definition,
The basis of faith in the natural and best way of communicating through language.
Derrida, who loves music and art, emphasizes many of the most important things that we feel
It has never been neatly expressed verbally or in writing, as logoscentism is often forgotten.
An example of logocentrism, which is particularly interested in the prestige of Derrida’s ideas.
IQ, this is mainly a measure of the logical ability of a person to solve problems.
But this largely ignores many other qualities of the mind,
For example, tell us that we know a person’s ability as a friend, as a parent,
ROR to play or manage your emotions
Derrida believes that some people may not be so brilliant in completing the geometric sequence,
But this will tell us that knowing their skills is the success of marriage,
A business, a holiday or a party.
All of its importance is well known to Derrida.
As a respected professor, who is the best university in the world to deliver a speech
Derrida, who is also a billiard and football hobby of Algerian Jews,
The entire basic doubts of the worldview of the modern intellectuals being cast.
Like many important thinkers,
Derrida cherishes her attitude as a correction for some excess.
In his case, he is too passionate about giving rational and clear answers.
Derrida does not want to delete all hierarchies.
He knows that this is correct, goodness should end cruelty, wit over dullness, generous and mean privilege
But he also understands how we close people and thoughts that are unwittingly dismissed.
What can be arbitrary when they are facing the opposite side.
At its best, Derrida is a humble and patient voice
Ask us to see what might be the value of these ideas
We are too easy to ignore and get curious as to why this may be good all the time,
Even for a little while, the other side of any argument.
One of the most famous and controversial figures
He pioneered deconstruction
Fundamentally change our understanding of many academic fields
Especially literary studies.
Dehida was born in the suburbs of Algeria in 1930 and was a French colony at the time.
He was born in a Jewish family and his father is a member of a local wine merchant.
His learning started slowly and he dreamed of becoming a professional football player.
In 1942, a new law was enacted by the French Vichy regime.
Jewish children like Dehida are forcibly excluded from public secondary schools.
Most of his time and his mother stayed at home.
Because of the large Muslim population in Algeria, he is excluded by many anti-Semitism.
And left a deep mark on the inferior experience
Three different religions
Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all claim to be truth
But don’t know how to treat other beliefs with respect
In 1949, Dehida was just 19 years old and went to the Paris Normal School.
He is an excellent student but in a strange position
He is very good at education.
But as a Jew, it is completely marginalized in the French metropolis.
Although Dehida is not a biographer
It is hard to read his work and not to be paranoid and repulsive to him.
Since 1960, Dehida has begun to have a famous idea.
As time progressed, he became a famous intellectual in Europe and America.
He is very tasteful about his clothes and hairstyle, and looks glamorous.
He has a rich and complex history of love
In 1980, he was arrested on suspicion of smuggling drugs.
But supported by the French president and politicians from the left and right
He likes to play snooker, most of the afternoon is playing
Even technical demonstrations
He died of pancreatic cancer at the age of 74 in 2004.
Dehida wrote 40 books, esoteric and subtle
But his importance to us can be revealed through the three verification methods that are often used.
Deconstruction, defamation, and logocentrism.
Behind the exaggerated vocabulary, there are some very important ideas buried.
Deconstruction is the most commonly used noun to connect with Dehida.
It is described as the way he thinks
But when others start using this method, he often feels
They misunderstood what he meant
Deconstruction dismantling our over-loyalty to any idea
And learn to explore the other side buried in truth.
In 1967, Dehida published his first important book: “Thesis”
The subject of its disclosure is rather strange, even boring
Dehida believes that Western philosophers since Socrates
Organized speech, regarded as true communication
Deprecated text is simply a tool for recording spoken speech
Lack of real feedback from conversations
It’s almost impossible to feel an important issue.
But Deschida’s plays are derived from the concept he developed.
His primary ambition is to promote this broad claim.
But once we start to look closely, almost all thinking is full of falsehood
There is one thing that goes beyond another. This is unreasonable and unhelpful.
Speech is better than writing
Reason overcomes passion
Men are better than women anyway
Text is better than picture
Vision is better than touch
Dehida’s focus is on the advantages and values we have not seen.
Not so much that Dehida is nihilism, everything is worthless.
He stressed
The other side that we ignore is worthy of being loved and concerned.
In his 40 books, Dehida deconstructed a series of key binary terms.
Rational relative sensibility, men versus women, utilitarian relative generosity, high culture and relatively vulgar culture
He hopes that we can learn a smarter lifestyle.
Under these conflicts
We can take a look at both aspects
Both of them are a little wrong, both need each other, between tense relationships
Will necessarily prove to be indispensable
It seems that Dehida seems to always attack the tradition with deconstruction.
And free market, promoting leftist egalitarianism
But it is a wonderful idea
For example, in the deconstruction of his concept of equality,
Dehida suggested that equality is always better than inequality.
Although equality may be the modern freedom truth
But in fact it is uncertain and unclear
He takes some outstanding people we know as an example.
Derrida is a devout professor and father.
Well-managed students and teachers, children and parents
Deconstruction should show that it is confusing and has the drawback of having logical defects
Moreover, we must always keep in mind its confusion
Derrida criticizes people tend to imagine, behind every problem
Have correct and suitable answers
We offer life that is destined to live without a clear answer.
And the desire for him is the root of our problems.
He wants to correct our original simple love
Let us have the wisdom of immortality and be more comfortable
For example, he believes that we may naturally be confused about the advantages of capitalism and socialism.
Or the relationship between love and sex, but we should not rush to the conclusions around these topics.
Useful things are on both sides of these equations
To conclude that capitalism is either splendid or sinful, or that love and sex are either
Very close contact or have nothing to do with each other
In order to avoid the ever-changing nature of fraud and reality.
Confusion and conceptual uncertainty around it
Not a sign of weakness or stupidity. This is the central symbol of Derrida’s maturity.
Derrida’s strategy is to beautify the situation and give it a positive ring.
That’s why he brought it back to use a beautiful Greek word:
Oh, it means deadlock or confusion.
He proposed that we should be proud of the right to know and the status of regular visits.
The world of Derrida is confusing and suspicious, not a dead end.
They are just evidence of adulthood in the heart.
The chief goal of a Derrida’s criticism is to call him a way of logocentrism.
Through his understanding of impatience, innocent and rational, logical and clear definition,
The basis of faith in the natural and best way of communicating through language.
Derrida, who loves music and art, emphasizes many of the most important things that we feel
It has never been neatly expressed verbally or in writing, as logoscentism is often forgotten.
An example of logocentrism, which is particularly interested in the prestige of Derrida’s ideas.
IQ, this is mainly a measure of the logical ability of a person to solve problems.
But this largely ignores many other qualities of the mind,
For example, tell us that we know a person’s ability as a friend, as a parent,
ROR to play or manage your emotions
Derrida believes that some people may not be so brilliant in completing the geometric sequence,
But this will tell us that knowing their skills is the success of marriage,
A business, a holiday or a party.
All of its importance is well known to Derrida.
As a respected professor, who is the best university in the world to deliver a speech
Derrida, who is also a billiard and football hobby of Algerian Jews,
The entire basic doubts of the worldview of the modern intellectuals being cast.
Like many important thinkers,
Derrida cherishes her attitude as a correction for some excess.
In his case, he is too passionate about giving rational and clear answers.
Derrida does not want to delete all hierarchies.
He knows that this is correct, goodness should end cruelty, wit over dullness, generous and mean privilege
But he also understands how we close people and thoughts that are unwittingly dismissed.
What can be arbitrary when they are facing the opposite side.
At its best, Derrida is a humble and patient voice
Ask us to see what might be the value of these ideas
We are too easy to ignore and get curious as to why this may be good all the time,
Even for a little while, the other side of any argument.
Please follow and like us: