I was looking at as many of you
final but long franzen don of the open of
China and the thing that strikes you is that ad
but there is one point that makes a long
dribble of straight ok the dribble is
the most defensive shot of the pong team
understood and dribbles is not against is a
Parisian tic tick and on the other side the
his opponent mistakes the context
important to understand that his
opponent fans and on is a car from
war is one that pulls a little backhand
300 to the right lot he said then
he has two legs so I look like a scooter
and he is one who never misses the ball
easy of course I looked at the whole thing
temptation was to think about seeing
bucket and sequel palleggi rue malonga
I could even put in trouble
that other player
the truth is that this deduction is one
big bullshit because out of context is
what I like to call blinding
I like it so much in detail
why trouser farinas works like that
the blunder of the detail that
we extrapolate I do it in
continuation of this error on the job
conclusions totally wrong
because if you take that element out of it
out of its context
skip everything in the case of our friend but
longhi why he does that
many points dribbling is but a
crazy draw so obvious that to a
crazy dribble very good and so on
etc. so obvious that maybe dribbles
in a certain way when one expects
a short ball arrives lengthens or changes
placing other variables but the reason
true is that in its overall context
when you play against us you know that if you up
that dribble do not do something
wonderful
this also pulls your ears away
why are they going to bomb 300 at the time of
sweep away the waves off your whole
part of the field is the context
overall 6 that same shot that
another dribble makes it another
player see that funds and not of
turn is not wrong because he does not know
that anguish on him given by the context
overall to play with him is a bit
how to say why you are concerned with the sun
nba finals eg every two minutes is
arrived a fake naive of
player who jump completely
out of position it seems there are those who have na
nova appear to be extras, but says
like that it bites so to the fake but in
that case the same stuff is obvious that that
hours ago a good pretend but the problem is
that the player
worried by the fact that hours if it
let pull is 3 also by pulling out
from the sports hall you are
forced to jump on him trying to
stop it and then a simple fake
born makes it jump away like an artichoke
whatever and the detail of the glow
from another influencer example I felt
talk a guy who said see now
It’s easy because everyone can become
it is enough to pay for the search
nick has changed not on the platforms in
reality is not true but it has never changed and
it always changes the algorithms and then you
to have visibility you have to pay then
at that point anyone enough that you pay e
it becomes good and is the detail of the
bay is not true
if it were enough to pay all companies with
a budget in all companies in the world
all the professionals in the world
anyone with money needs a super
influencer would be with tens the least
crazy the truth is that it’s not like that
but if you are not competent, do not enter
merit of these dynamics clearly
of the easiest part of it
extrapolate and take out a rule
general is the lack of context in the
our assessment that makes it totally
useless in most cases i
books that we read formulas and methods
frameworks do not work because
extrapolated from that context
they mean nothing that is a formula
marketing worked in a certain
historical moment has done to all and not
it works more or one in good faith
think what I do often
exposes a method and says look I did
so but it is not said that it works
same way for you because changed the
historical wind because the variables are
different but the overall context that
you have to consider think other channels
that explode to maybe it’s one that does
gameplay and five of his friends already have
of the other channels of gameplay that it
signal and then you see it grows the
cicas and this is a phenomenon to phenomenon
maybe yes, however, to a context that
it helps to grow
if you remove that from your equation
evaluation is always always wrong
altered you can not not consider all
these variables
every time we turn off the light of the
context from our equation e
we end up making choices that fuck and
we end up crying in the darkness of the
our bedroom but as the wise says
bergonzoni when I see a man who
he cries in the darkness of his bedroom
I wonder what drives him to not
turn on the light
final but long franzen don of the open of
China and the thing that strikes you is that ad
but there is one point that makes a long
dribble of straight ok the dribble is
the most defensive shot of the pong team
understood and dribbles is not against is a
Parisian tic tick and on the other side the
his opponent mistakes the context
important to understand that his
opponent fans and on is a car from
war is one that pulls a little backhand
300 to the right lot he said then
he has two legs so I look like a scooter
and he is one who never misses the ball
easy of course I looked at the whole thing
temptation was to think about seeing
bucket and sequel palleggi rue malonga
I could even put in trouble
that other player
the truth is that this deduction is one
big bullshit because out of context is
what I like to call blinding
I like it so much in detail
why trouser farinas works like that
the blunder of the detail that
we extrapolate I do it in
continuation of this error on the job
conclusions totally wrong
because if you take that element out of it
out of its context
skip everything in the case of our friend but
longhi why he does that
many points dribbling is but a
crazy draw so obvious that to a
crazy dribble very good and so on
etc. so obvious that maybe dribbles
in a certain way when one expects
a short ball arrives lengthens or changes
placing other variables but the reason
true is that in its overall context
when you play against us you know that if you up
that dribble do not do something
wonderful
this also pulls your ears away
why are they going to bomb 300 at the time of
sweep away the waves off your whole
part of the field is the context
overall 6 that same shot that
another dribble makes it another
player see that funds and not of
turn is not wrong because he does not know
that anguish on him given by the context
overall to play with him is a bit
how to say why you are concerned with the sun
nba finals eg every two minutes is
arrived a fake naive of
player who jump completely
out of position it seems there are those who have na
nova appear to be extras, but says
like that it bites so to the fake but in
that case the same stuff is obvious that that
hours ago a good pretend but the problem is
that the player
worried by the fact that hours if it
let pull is 3 also by pulling out
from the sports hall you are
forced to jump on him trying to
stop it and then a simple fake
born makes it jump away like an artichoke
whatever and the detail of the glow
from another influencer example I felt
talk a guy who said see now
It’s easy because everyone can become
it is enough to pay for the search
nick has changed not on the platforms in
reality is not true but it has never changed and
it always changes the algorithms and then you
to have visibility you have to pay then
at that point anyone enough that you pay e
it becomes good and is the detail of the
bay is not true
if it were enough to pay all companies with
a budget in all companies in the world
all the professionals in the world
anyone with money needs a super
influencer would be with tens the least
crazy the truth is that it’s not like that
but if you are not competent, do not enter
merit of these dynamics clearly
of the easiest part of it
extrapolate and take out a rule
general is the lack of context in the
our assessment that makes it totally
useless in most cases i
books that we read formulas and methods
frameworks do not work because
extrapolated from that context
they mean nothing that is a formula
marketing worked in a certain
historical moment has done to all and not
it works more or one in good faith
think what I do often
exposes a method and says look I did
so but it is not said that it works
same way for you because changed the
historical wind because the variables are
different but the overall context that
you have to consider think other channels
that explode to maybe it’s one that does
gameplay and five of his friends already have
of the other channels of gameplay that it
signal and then you see it grows the
cicas and this is a phenomenon to phenomenon
maybe yes, however, to a context that
it helps to grow
if you remove that from your equation
evaluation is always always wrong
altered you can not not consider all
these variables
every time we turn off the light of the
context from our equation e
we end up making choices that fuck and
we end up crying in the darkness of the
our bedroom but as the wise says
bergonzoni when I see a man who
he cries in the darkness of his bedroom
I wonder what drives him to not
turn on the light
Please follow and like us: