Press "Enter" to skip to content

We’re drowning in BS, but you can learn how to fight back. | Jevin West | TEDxSeattle


[Applause]

politicians are unconstrained by fact

disinformation has reached epidemic

levels even my field in science has been

tarnished by predatory journals and the

press release and yes even Ted has been

known to create a platform for a little

bit of stylistic BS now there’s been a

lot of talk over the last year about

fake news and the consequences really

should not be ignored but I have to

admit some of it’s actually kind of good

and pleasantly entertaining earlier this

year I learned the Taylor Swift is

dating Senator McCarthy now there are a

lot of fans that have been disappointed

with this they’ve been disappointed

because it was the fourth guy in six

months fortunately we do have we do have

fact checkers on the web and someone

noted that Senator Joseph McCarthy died

50 years ago so we’re good there now

this kind of fake news is a needed

reprieve from our intense politically

charged news cycle that we see every day

but what happens when news like this

starts moving around the internet

according to a wd news Israel was

threatening Pakistan with nuclear

weapons if they send troops into Syria

now this sort of thing you know we look

at this and we say well there’s

grammatical errors in the headline if

you look closely they were talking about

the wrong Defense Minister in Israel it

was irrefutably fake news it was taken

down there was no debate whether this

was real but it wasn’t taken down

soon enough in response to this fake

news item the Defense Minister of

Pakistan tweeted back with a sword

rattling tweet Israel forgets that

Pakistan is a nuclear state as well now

most of the fake news out there on the

web is a minor annoyance and as I

mentioned sometimes entertaining but the

kind of fake news we’re seeing now world

preservation is at stake now one of the

things that we’ve tried to do my

colleague and I is figure out how we can

bring our skills from what we do in

science in refutation and teach a class

on spotting and refuting BS we want to

teach students how to address these

kinds of things they’re seeing in the

news address them in dinner

conversations but we have a particular

emphasis on a new school kind of BS this

is BS that’s wrapped in data graphics

statistics it can carry this veneer of

authority that really is undeserving

earlier in January of this year on

January 11th we released the course we

woke up the next morning and there were

tens of thousands of people from all

over the world in one night it really

seemed to have struck a chord when we

officially made it a registered course

at the University it filled within less

than a minute 160 seats filled within

less than a minute from 40 different

majors across campus that’s what I’m

most proud of is that everyone is

recognizing this sort of thing but if

all the things that have made us get

most excited about it is that 60

universities have now contact us to

teach this kind of material now we have

a version that doesn’t have swear words

in it too so that’s good we have calling

ball org but it really does seem to a

struck a chord now we have 40 hours of

lecture we continue to make this content

available but one of

most important principles that we want

to teach to students and the general

public it’s something that comes from

Brandolini x’ BS asymmetry principle

it’s it’s a great principle if you study

studies and that is that it’s

an order of magnitude it takes an order

of magnitude more energy to refute BS

than it does to create it in other words

yes is easy to create there’s incentives

to do this it doesn’t cost that much

money there’s not really legal

ramifications for it but once it gets

out there even after refutation it’s

hard to clean up now the recent pizza

gate scandal is really a perfect example

of this according to the conspiracy

Hillary Clinton was running a pedophile

ring in the pizzeria of Comet a comet

ping pong it’s a restaurant in DC Edgar

Welch a citizen of Salisbury North

Carolina wanted to do something about it

he’d been reading it on the Internet he

decided to pick up his gun get in his

truck and drive to this pizzeria luckily

no one was hurt but even after he found

out that it was fake

even after Alex Jones who was one of the

primary promulgator ‘s of this

particular news after he apologized and

admitted that it was not true earlier

this year after all of that families

felt so strongly that this was a

cover-up that the conspiracy was alive

that they went to the White House lawn

and protested so Brandolini say symmetry

principle we see it all the time even

after you clean up now the creators of

this fake news and the propagators are

certainly to blame they share most of

the blame but we the readers are to

blame as well earlier this year science

Post published a story saying that 70%

of Facebook users only read the headline

I hear some laughters in there so I

think I know what’s coming at the time

of this screen capture by the way

this was a real headline there were tens

of thousands of people that had shared

this but if you were one of those rare

readers of stories one of those rare

readers you would have found lorem ipsum

random text this was not a real story it

was a joke on readers who only read

headlines about a story that only read

so that’s lesson number one let’s read

beyond the headlines it takes a lot of

effort and we are inundated with

information we can’t read everything so

people have said give me one slide that

you want to give to the class if that’s

all you could give it’s four words it’s

an addendum to this first lesson and

that is think more shared less instead

of share more but I will say that it’s

not the headline spread spreading that

concerns me the most it’s the imagery

spreading it’s those deep emotion of

voguing memes that pass around the

internet that drive wedges between us in

January of last year Seattle Seahawks

thumped the Arizona Cardinals yeah and

they were celebrating in the locker room

but they weren’t celebrating over the

victory they were celebrating over

Michael Bennett burning the American

now of course this was photoshopped and

the Facebook page that put it up

originally did take it down they even

admitted that it was fake but not soon

enough it’s these kind of images that

are driving wedges between us that are

so watch out for those emotional hooks

get in our way of being able to truly be

s detect they get to the deep centers of

our brain and it’s hard to think

logically now I will say that students

are good at finding these things we’ve

done lots of little tests back and forth

we do quizzes fun quizzes in class where

we have them sort of differentiate

between the real and not real they can

identify those memes and those headlines

and they’d even create good habits of

mind by reading headlines but the thing

that we’re finding most people are

struggling with the most is this BS

wrapped in charts they’re everywhere now

in this world of big data now there’s

been a lot of discussion around the gun

laws one of the controversial laws that

was enacted in 2005 in Florida was a law

the stand-your-ground law the idea was

that if you feel threatened in your home

or in your place where you deserve you

can respond with lethal force now

there’s there’s been lots of debates

backwards and forwards on whether this

would create decrease or increase crime

decrease or increase gun deaths but if

you look at this chart the gun law was

enacted in 2005 and you see that the

black line goes down but something

highly unconventional is going on with

this graph most of you have noticed it

the 0 was put at the top now that tells

a much different story but I’m starting

easy for you there are many more subtle

ways to manipulate data arguments

because that’s where they’re coming now

if I was if I wanted to write a story

about the industriousness of German

Workers compared to those lazy French I

could make a chart like this you know in

this chart the line itself is more than

three times bigger than the other line

but you can clearly see that 40 and 37

are not that different so what am I

doing here

I’m simply zooming in and I can zoom in

enough to exacerbate those differences

so much I can make any argument I want

with a chart there’s many easy ways to

manipulate with axes

and this is where we all can can become

good BS detectors because it’s easy to

manipulate but really easy to call BS on

a more honest way of reporting this is

to include the zero simple but you’ll

see this all the time I see it every day

literally every day now there’s also

been a lot of discussion about climate

change and the raising temperature NASA

makes these data available so anyone can

plot them they typically look like this

over the last hundred years from the

1950s we see a general two degree

increase now we can debate whether

that’s significant or not but this is

the data now I can do something magical

by just zooming out far enough I can

create a graph like the National Review

claimed was the only graph you needed to

see on climate change

zoom far enough out and you can even

take a diagonal and make it look flat so

that’s the lesson here it sounds a

little more technical but everyone in

this room can start sounding smart in

the board meeting or anytime they read

their newspapers look out for axis

manipulation both zooming in and zooming

out you can create different arguments

all the time but people ask me aren’t

these honest mistakes and actually yes

I truly am an optimist on of people and

I think most of the time they’re honest

mistakes but how can you tell honest

mistakes from shenanigans

ask three questions they’re really

useful ask who is telling me this how do

they know it and what do they have to

gain from it imagine that I am telling

you right now I’ve got a new vitamin

it’s gonna make you 24% smarter just

meet me after my talk I’ll give you a

great deal

now you will call BS on that that’s easy

but we want to do that in all

circumstances in graphs as well but what

we’re seeing in our media every day is

the selling of narratives from our left

media and our right media we need to be

aware of this earlier this year MSNBC

tweeted the following during the debate

on the immigration policy whether you

agree with it or not this

was tweeted it said that international

applications at American schools were

down 40% now something I tell my

students all the time

dig to the source students have been

hearing this since the early days of

librarian exposure as elementary kids

but do this so thank you librarians good

job but here’s the actual report if you

dig to the report by the American

Association of college registrar’s here

is the main finding the finding was not

that the applications were down 40% they

were down at 40% of the schools which is

a much different story

1% 2% in these 40 percent of the schools

but here’s on top of that you find that

it was up at 35 percent of the schools

so much different stories now you know

if it sounds too good to be true

or too bad in this case it probably is

this is a favorite among the students I

have this almost every day in class

they’ll come running up to me in class

and they’ll say I found something that

sounded too good to be true and they’re

just so excited they’re pulling up their

computer we look at it and they

generally a’right use this one this

one’s a lot of fun I use this one every

day as well now this narrative selling

is not just a left media problem the

right media has been known to share a

few narratives of their own the food

stamp discussion has certainly been won

last year they reported that 70 million

dollars had been lost to fraud

sounds like a big number should we even

keep the program around that’s a lot of

wasted money but one thing I tell my

students is that you need to put those

numbers in context 70 million dollars

means nothing unless you know what it is

in the full budget in this case or the

context for which that number came now

we teach students how to do Fermi

estimations and ways of testing the

plausibility of an argument I won’t go

through that but I will show you that if

you do that quickly the actual budget is

about 30 billion it’s actually high

but through this estimation through the

behind the napkin kind of calculation

you find that it’s an incredibly small

loss rate most of retail and Nordstrom

here in Seattle and and Starbucks they

would love the kind of loss rate that’s

been shown here but that’s not the best

part of this story the best part of this

story was that the Agriculture

Department was a little bit irritated

and they demanded a retraction Fox News

did acquiesce and admitted that the

number was not real but here’s the best

part it was actually much higher the

fraud way was actually about 10 times

greater than that they were fine saying

that because the conclusions held the

fraud rate is actually quite small

should we cancel a program were 499

people out of 500 are properly using the

program I don’t think so

so you know in in Seattle we are proud

of our environmental conscience but

instead of just being carbon neutral I

encourage us all to be neutral

we’re humans we make mistakes we create

and we promulgate when we don’t

even know it but we need to start

cleaning up this mess I have found in

teaching this class that students love

to call BS but they generally like

calling BS on the other team the left

team the right team the red the blue but

to be sophisticated detectors

we need to be able to call BS on our own

team and then clean up our own yard

first as Neil postman said so eloquently

more than 50 years ago exactly 50 years

ago at any given time the chief source

of that we must contend is

ourself if we want to maintain

a strong democracy and we want to

strengthen collective decision-making we

need to be able to look at our own

communities call BS on ourselves and

we’ll be better off thank you

you [Applause]

Please follow and like us: