[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
no
[Music]
Today more than ever mention the disasters is
fundamental according to the united nations
between 2000 and 2011 about 2.7
billions of people involved in
disasters all over the world and because of the
climate change natural disasters
in the last ten years I’m more than
doubled and brings natural disasters
a scarcity of resources to conflicts
social migrations wars mine
security coordinator experience
civil has taught and changing the
perception of risk many lives
can be saved and many disasters
can be avoided I put one
question you are more afraid of undergoing a
terrorist attack or to take
your car
how many of you are more afraid of suffering
a terrorist attack
and how much instead of taking one’s own
car
OK perfect
well as the majority of the
people obviously more frightened by the
suffer a terrorist attack
the chances of dying in an accident
road are much higher then me
I recommend when you come home tonight
and brings you another example of how
a bad perception of reality e
therefore of the risk or to compromise the
our actions
let’s take what happened to
example last year in turin there were
some sounds shots people who
they escaped and in a few minutes they are there
been dead and over 1,500 injured
simply verona bad perception
of what was happening
the fear of the attacks was really
very strong at that time and then the
people have interpreted so
wrong what was happening
but why is there a perception of the
risk so different from reality
well some studies had shown that
there is obviously a distinct gap of
knowledge among the data that they had
experts those of the population in fact
it was tried to try to give access to
this information also to
normal population and yet perception
of the risk continued to not coincide
and in fact you have been seen that not
it simply depends on factors
rational from the data but the perception of the
risk depends a lot on the messenger
rational automatic and which are therefore
these factors that influence ours
perception of risk I will tell you about
three factors the first is that of the
familiarity for example the inhabitants ai
nowadays bradyseism is living in the Phlegraean fields
with an almost normal form because it is a
recurring phenomenon and therefore they are
they perceive as much less dangerous
compared to those who maybe dance and hear
some jolt because obviously it is not
used and people who live
habitually risky situations
they perceive the dangers so much
different because they mix it almost with
normality
a second factor is that of
control because we overestimate ourselves
we always do it and more and more
risky to take the car that the plane
but if we are in control
motor vehicle we think
that we will certainly not do
accidents and perhaps the human mind thinks
even if we were the guide
of the plane we could drive it better than the
professionals because we
we think we are very good and therefore a
keep under control of reality
obviously this is not the case
the third to the voluntariness when there
example a weather alert who chooses to
leave home who chooses not to
feel that you are not listening in fact
from the weather warning of the protection
civil perceives records in a lot
inferior to those who maybe see the alert and
you barricade in the house now be a
knowledge of these three factors
obviously he manages to help us out for
understand the connection between
perception and behavior and certainly
the risk and reduction of risks from
disasters surely influenced by
social anthropic factors but above all
from the choices we take to ask the
just common to know the plan of
civil protection or will require one
practical training can do the
difference know what to do in case of
a storm can definitely do it
difference often I find myself to
go to the schools the boys are
always really very very interested
to this topic and often do some
questions could also seem almost
trivial but if they do not do it if i
guys do not pose certain problems
when they are then in a real one
emergency do not know what to do one
question that arises very often
it is about information that arrives
partially or during a shock
of earthquake tell us not to take
the elevator and do not use the stairs
so if I ‘m on the fifth floor that
I’ll throw myself down obviously not then
the answer immediately no then the second
answer is definitely not the elevators
should be taken regarding instead
stairs must not be used during the
shake, however, immediately afterwards
it was inside wall you can use and
talking about schools
the istat has found that they are among the
buildings in Italy most at risk ie the
Most schools are not up to date
safety
now of course we are all in favor of
greater infrastructural investments
but something too much would be enough
more almost trivial to reduce the lot
risk also simply decrease the
therefore, the number of students per class has
it would obviously make the procedures for us
much faster evacuation and then the
risk would decrease significantly but
we zoom further on ours
territory we are now in Campania
and the campania is known worldwide for the
its history the beauty of the territory the
food and obviously protect these
resources is everyone’s interest
yet a church that collapses or a
landscape defaced by a landslide or
still food poisoned by pollution
they are all things are all things that
we have already seen and that obviously
they compromise our territory
our identity is our essence e
so we all have to do something
to preserve these resources
what can we do well, surely
education participation information
they are all things that help us to have
the tools to better understand the
risk and therefore to know how
behave in case of emergency because
we are all part of the system of
civil protection
this thing means that we all
we must try to create communities
seeley silent Community bodies that
so they can adapt to resist
better to change for a development
sustainable that takes into account
the environment in which we are the
sustainable development definition
internationally recognized is that
of a development that takes into account the
needs of the present without however
compromise that of generations
future and all of us together can
help create a future with
fewer risks because we are all in fact
part of the civil protection system
thank you
no
[Music]
[Music]
no
[Music]
Today more than ever mention the disasters is
fundamental according to the united nations
between 2000 and 2011 about 2.7
billions of people involved in
disasters all over the world and because of the
climate change natural disasters
in the last ten years I’m more than
doubled and brings natural disasters
a scarcity of resources to conflicts
social migrations wars mine
security coordinator experience
civil has taught and changing the
perception of risk many lives
can be saved and many disasters
can be avoided I put one
question you are more afraid of undergoing a
terrorist attack or to take
your car
how many of you are more afraid of suffering
a terrorist attack
and how much instead of taking one’s own
car
OK perfect
well as the majority of the
people obviously more frightened by the
suffer a terrorist attack
the chances of dying in an accident
road are much higher then me
I recommend when you come home tonight
and brings you another example of how
a bad perception of reality e
therefore of the risk or to compromise the
our actions
let’s take what happened to
example last year in turin there were
some sounds shots people who
they escaped and in a few minutes they are there
been dead and over 1,500 injured
simply verona bad perception
of what was happening
the fear of the attacks was really
very strong at that time and then the
people have interpreted so
wrong what was happening
but why is there a perception of the
risk so different from reality
well some studies had shown that
there is obviously a distinct gap of
knowledge among the data that they had
experts those of the population in fact
it was tried to try to give access to
this information also to
normal population and yet perception
of the risk continued to not coincide
and in fact you have been seen that not
it simply depends on factors
rational from the data but the perception of the
risk depends a lot on the messenger
rational automatic and which are therefore
these factors that influence ours
perception of risk I will tell you about
three factors the first is that of the
familiarity for example the inhabitants ai
nowadays bradyseism is living in the Phlegraean fields
with an almost normal form because it is a
recurring phenomenon and therefore they are
they perceive as much less dangerous
compared to those who maybe dance and hear
some jolt because obviously it is not
used and people who live
habitually risky situations
they perceive the dangers so much
different because they mix it almost with
normality
a second factor is that of
control because we overestimate ourselves
we always do it and more and more
risky to take the car that the plane
but if we are in control
motor vehicle we think
that we will certainly not do
accidents and perhaps the human mind thinks
even if we were the guide
of the plane we could drive it better than the
professionals because we
we think we are very good and therefore a
keep under control of reality
obviously this is not the case
the third to the voluntariness when there
example a weather alert who chooses to
leave home who chooses not to
feel that you are not listening in fact
from the weather warning of the protection
civil perceives records in a lot
inferior to those who maybe see the alert and
you barricade in the house now be a
knowledge of these three factors
obviously he manages to help us out for
understand the connection between
perception and behavior and certainly
the risk and reduction of risks from
disasters surely influenced by
social anthropic factors but above all
from the choices we take to ask the
just common to know the plan of
civil protection or will require one
practical training can do the
difference know what to do in case of
a storm can definitely do it
difference often I find myself to
go to the schools the boys are
always really very very interested
to this topic and often do some
questions could also seem almost
trivial but if they do not do it if i
guys do not pose certain problems
when they are then in a real one
emergency do not know what to do one
question that arises very often
it is about information that arrives
partially or during a shock
of earthquake tell us not to take
the elevator and do not use the stairs
so if I ‘m on the fifth floor that
I’ll throw myself down obviously not then
the answer immediately no then the second
answer is definitely not the elevators
should be taken regarding instead
stairs must not be used during the
shake, however, immediately afterwards
it was inside wall you can use and
talking about schools
the istat has found that they are among the
buildings in Italy most at risk ie the
Most schools are not up to date
safety
now of course we are all in favor of
greater infrastructural investments
but something too much would be enough
more almost trivial to reduce the lot
risk also simply decrease the
therefore, the number of students per class has
it would obviously make the procedures for us
much faster evacuation and then the
risk would decrease significantly but
we zoom further on ours
territory we are now in Campania
and the campania is known worldwide for the
its history the beauty of the territory the
food and obviously protect these
resources is everyone’s interest
yet a church that collapses or a
landscape defaced by a landslide or
still food poisoned by pollution
they are all things are all things that
we have already seen and that obviously
they compromise our territory
our identity is our essence e
so we all have to do something
to preserve these resources
what can we do well, surely
education participation information
they are all things that help us to have
the tools to better understand the
risk and therefore to know how
behave in case of emergency because
we are all part of the system of
civil protection
this thing means that we all
we must try to create communities
seeley silent Community bodies that
so they can adapt to resist
better to change for a development
sustainable that takes into account
the environment in which we are the
sustainable development definition
internationally recognized is that
of a development that takes into account the
needs of the present without however
compromise that of generations
future and all of us together can
help create a future with
fewer risks because we are all in fact
part of the civil protection system
thank you
no
Please follow and like us: