Press "Enter" to skip to content

There are Wrong Ways to Help: Examples from Afghanistan | Bethany Lerch | TEDxOshkosh


I never should have made it to

Afghanistan as a student of

international and terrorism studies I

had always wanted to go but it was never

really supposed to happen because even

though what I studied lent itself to

government I never seemed able to find

the right place apply at the right time

or quite frankly be the right person

until suddenly oddly someone thought I

was my qualifications to work in Kabul

were sufficient but they hardly compared

to the outstanding accomplishments of my

subject matter expert colleagues what I

lacked in skill I harbored an enthusiasm

for the mission to train advise and

assist Afghan so there I was I showed up

with big ears and eyes and believing and

winning without knowing like most

unfortunately what it takes to win for

the first seven months I trained the

trainer instructing coalition advisors

who in turn assisted Afghan civilians

police and military members over time

though my hopefulness faded and I found

a sad home in doubt and his trust by

chance I crossed paths with the former

governance and rule of law advisor to

five previous four-star ICF commanders

with his mentorship I learned a great

deal I sharpened my ability to discern

and I began to deal in realism for the

next nine months I worked off base

directly with Afghans in the end I came

away with cautious optimism for

Afghanistan in a real sense and

appreciation for pragmatism when it

comes to making a difference bearing in

mind that today is about ideas that

challenge us I’d like to share one with

you that I would have countered with

gusto just a few short years ago no no I

would have told you that’s not how it

now I know there are wrong ways to help

my shift in perspective came with those

sixteen formative months in Afghanistan

where I saw that sometimes it’s better

not to help at all than to do so

unwisely challenging though it would be

there are no answers for how to fix

Afghanistan today that’s not why we’re

here instead I have three theories about

how to help one another and how not to

help one another whether as states

communities or neighbors well we need to

be better at together is recognizing the

help we give is not wanted or working

because there is value in stopping not

repeating that which consistently fails

help that fails to make a positive

change my first theory is that bigger is

not better nor is more only in some

cases can success be had by blanketing a

problem with large sums of money and an

influx of people looking back Great

Britain’s 18th and 19th century exploits

in Afghanistan were mixed but the

Imperial model overall usually resulted

in growth for its colonies and one of

the reasons for this success was because

Great Britain deployed a smaller

footprint of highly qualified

individuals willing and able to sustain

the mission in one place for years on

end if not their lives the model of the

model if you will was a man named

Alexander burns flawed in some respects

but deeply talented in most others Burns

was the kingdom’s brightest political

officer to Afghanistan in the 1800’s

that that’s because he he took it upon

himself to live among the people he

learned the language and he spoke it

fluently he knew the culture intimately

he wrote prolifically about his travel

and experiences and his copious notes

went on to better explain Afghan

people’s tribes and ways of life and

they are still referenced today Burns

was much like Lawrence of Arabia both of

them career

British statesman in one place they

didn’t just balance the books they were

there to ensure that colonial governance

functions smoothly day to day and their

approach was anthropologists like

because they were patient and happy to

live with like the people this made all

the difference

fast forward to late 2001 to the West

arrival in Afghanistan since then in 15

years literally millions of foreigners

have rotated in and then rotated back

out

this modern revolving door of personnel

strains the crucial cultural element

needed in Afghanistan above all else and

that’s trust in counterinsurgency clear

hold build depends as much on human

capital as it does on financial capital

and both can be misused I would argue

controversial maybe perhaps people

should be screened before they go to

execute the strategy do they really care

about winning hearts and minds in my

time as a trainer in Kabul I met more

than a few who did not care once while

leading a session on Afghan culture and

the importance of greeting one another

greeting their counterparts in dari the

local language a DoD civilian rolled her

eyes and interjected why should we say

hello to them what have they ever done

for us I was shocked

mostly I was discouraged the mission is

to help Afghans in Afghanistan if you

cannot bring yourself to say hello what

are you doing here

[Music]

it made me wonder money-wise millions of

dollars are spent per hour in

Afghanistan a great many things have

been done with this amount though not

without error issues began when instead

of asking how much to borrow this land

often the modus operandi was to transfer

cash when additional space was needed at

a later time or in another space there

was less maneuverability to negotiate

the West’s habit of paying exorbitant

sums in a country with his staggering

poverty as Afghanistan it went on to

limit our long-term sustainability

influenced expectations on both sides

and affect their culture always

problematic in Afghanistan is a penchant

for graft tidal waves of money made it

worse corruption has been deemed the

most significant threat to stability in

Afghanistan two examples spring to mind

here one quite big and well known the

other less so but more prevalent first

Kabul Bank was new to the development

scene in the early 2000s by 2010 just

under 1 billion dollars had been

swindled from its depositors by the

Afghan elite second an Afghan military

commander part of a training facility

agreed to build a separation barrier

between male and female barracks because

the women were being harassed this was a

project to be done with foreign funds

when the money was allocated he took it

and he built himself a personal pool

people are an investment when it comes

to helping others especially in

Afghanistan where there is nothing

without trust what would it be like to

scale down the mission go back to those

willing and able to live work among

Afghans for the long haul I think there

would be value in that old-fashioned

diplomacy it would cost less there would

be less opportunity to steal

and I bet there’s a strong chance that

Afghans would enjoy more stability than

they do now my second theory is that

change is restricted when change is

forced during the Taliban there were no

women’s rights in Afghanistan

Afghanistan still ranks among the lowest

in the world at gender equality and

integration in March 2015 a young woman

named for Honda was violent and killed

by a mob in downtown Kabul President

Ghani promised justice when in reality

the lawyer representing the victim’s

family was quietly asked to step down

from the highest levels of government

judicial proceedings for the men and

some women actually who beat farkhunda

who ran her over and dragged her by car

and then lit her body on fire were

appalling there were hundreds in that

crowd only 49 were accused less than

half were formally charged and every

sentence was later reduced unfortunately

too many conservative Afghans women just

do not have the same rights or worth as

men even so there is concentrated effort

by the West for Afghanistan to

incorporate women into its national

security apparatus in order to do that

Afghanistan has agreed to implement

international law in the form of a UN

Security Council resolution that enables

women to participate in post-conflict

reconstruction now there are some who

genuinely wants and actively strive

toward gender integration in Afghanistan

but this decidedly new initiative is not

as idealistic as one would hope in fact

its bolstered in large part by

substantial financial incentive as seen

in the last case of that missing

separation barrier Afghan women are

primarily seen as wives and mothers and

often physically separated from men who

are not family to include women in

uniform like men with men makes for a

sudden switch it’s a presume to us for

foreigners to come in and announce we

have women in our armed forces so should

that’s misrepresentative of real change

I think real change is not that easy and

here’s why

in 2010 the Afghan government set a real

ambitious goal we want 10% of the

National Defense and security forces to

be women in ten years five years into

that goal 0.5% of the army was women and

1.5 percent of the police was women they

have since gone back to the drawing

board on that to find a goal that is

more feasible for Afghanistan at the

highest levels of government there is

support for gender integration at the

micro level sharing authority with women

is not popular as a consequence Afghan

service women have serious complaints

passed over for promotion no facilities

verbal harassment abuse threats hearing

about the challenges of Afghan service

women directly from Afghan service women

got me thinking and it got to me

mostly what if this kind of push for

this kind of gender integration

admirable though it is is too much too

soon if there is more harm than good in

action right now maybe there is more

good than harm and utility in

old-fashioned conversation think of it

like ink blotting one conversation is

one dot over time that dot gains

traction a little bit by itself but once

it hits other dots of ink it grows it

becomes a blot in order to have women in

the in the services in Afghanistan

there’s a prerequisite a woman cannot

sign up by herself she has to have the

permission of her father brother or her

husband that’s why this is called gender

integration both of them that’s why it’s

important to create that exposure first

if you’re going to have Afghan women

serving their country perhaps having

weapons this is a drastically different

thing you need to talk about it first

ergo the value of all encompassing

conversation

whereby you introduce an idea to a

people before that idea simply manifests

itself before people can accept it my

third theory is that there are cultural

limits to what is possible and that this

is actually okay being a new person in a

new place is about being aware who is in

the same space how do they interact this

takes a lot of looking and listening

because as a change agent you’re

expected to fit into that setting you

are expected to respect that culture and

adapt to it as best as you can

regrettably many change agents show up

and ask what are my goals according to

what I know when the wiser question is

what are realistic goals according to

the host audience and their culture some

years ago there were reports that

coalition personnel working with a

village without local access to water

bill to well in that village to help it

seemed logical it was part of

counterinsurgency strategy to assist

rural villages later when coalition

personnel returned they found the well

destroyed those of you who have seen

Tina Fey and whiskey-tango-foxtrot may

already be familiar now the reports they

suggested that village women were to

blame because they couldn’t walk and

talk on their way to get water had a

woman that involved in this an Afghan

woman been involved in the

decision-making maybe the outcome would

have been different I would argue that’s

that’s probably a measure that’s too

much too soon for Afghanistan and for

conservative rural areas which accounts

for 80% of the population had someone

been present someone else a foreigner

maybe who knew more about Afghan women

and village culture we could have

avoided the security risk for one and we

could have saved money spent on an

unwanted well to be a respected change

agent you have to know an audience so

well as to know what goals are

appropriate what goals will challenge

their cult

but also drive it forward in a quiet way

you have to be willing to guide that

audience many people at one time toured

and through that goal with confidence it

takes a lot of looking and listening and

adapting because they’re not going to

adapt to you it’s on you as the guest to

adapt and there are entirely too many

change agents who don’t but that’s

what’s expected of you you have to know

when to improvise when to modify your

goal when to scrap it and start

completely from scratch or do more

research in April 2015 after that

conference I got a chance to visit a

Kabul orphanage and in our multiple

convoys we carried monster sized boxes

brimming with different kinds of toys

the children all 88 of them were

overjoyed to see us and us them and then

they saw the toys and then chaos because

they had nothing they wanted everything

we were so looking forward to going

there to meeting them to seeing young

people giving them something we thought

they would like but we hadn’t

coordinated our gift with the orphanage

staff so we didn’t know and we didn’t

think that bringing toys would also

bring mayhem two months later we packed

88 mostly the same school kits the boys

and girls were happy we were happy it

was simple it worked

changing course with the kids was a

reminder that big go big this this does

not always apply and I know we like to

apply it but it doesn’t work all the

time it’s a reminder that force change

tends to be inadequate and it’s a

reminder that there are assistance goals

somehow I made it to Afghanistan and

what I learned and internalized is that

there are many ways people can make

change and help not all of which are

effective are appropriate for instance

you can

blast Rock to radically alter a

landscape or you can learn to control

explosions as in the kinds inside our

car engines that propel us and others

forward making and managing those bursts

of change among people takes profound

dedication helping Afghanistan it’s the

macro version of helping others where

the micro rule still applies help others

for the sake of helping them what Plato

would describe is truly noble and

morally right the only real reason to

give help helping others for the sake of

helping them forces us URI as a system

as change agents to be more deliberate

and if that’s not our reason it’s likely

the wrong way to help from the get-go

and that’s a problem for the change

agent not the audience a slower

old-fashioned road may very well lead us

to more valuable ways to inspire others

to create and control those bursts of

change for themselves

and not be afraid of it that’s when help

is right and when lasting change is possible thank you

Please follow and like us: