Press "Enter" to skip to content

How we can finally win the fight against aging | Aubrey De Grey | TEDxMünchen


I work on Aging and I’m not in favor of

it I’m trying to fix this and I thing to

be doing okay so um I’ve got a question

for you here’s the first question in

fact I’ve got a few questions over the

next few minutes um I decided when I was

really young like eight or nine years

old that I wanted to make a difference

in the world and that eventually led me

into science for several years I worked

in artificial intelligence research and

then when I was in my late 20s I

switched careers and became a biologist

now the reason I did so was because I

found out that hardly anyone was working

on the world’s most important problem

namely the fact that we get sick when we

were born a long time ago and then we

die and that’s kind of like not a good

thing so so I am you know I really want

to know why people don’t get this and at

Ted or TEDx events I have the right kind

of audience for this because these guys

people who can’t you guys people who

come to conferences like this ultimately

you are visionaries or at least you are

one of the visionaries right you you you

would kind of like to UM you know to

make a difference in the world so you

know let’s look at the let’s look at the

kind of things that I don’t think are

very controversial that that you

probably all agree with you know you

care about people

you’re not skating you’re a visionary

right you’re not scared to aim high you

see that there are lots of people out

there who are not visionaries who are

scared to aim high and ultimately it’s

not a crime not to want to aim high you

may not think much of those people but

the fact is you want to help them anyway

so um that’s it right what if I actually

mean well it means making a difference

perhaps making a really I mean really

big difference and the question that is

what is a bigger difference than what

he’s a smaller difference I think there

are two dimensions to that two things

that determine whether you’re how big a

difference you’re going to make number

one how important the thing is that

you’re going to work

to change and number two how easy it is

to change it those two things both have

to be looked at because unimportant

things we can forget about those they’re

definitely not big but important things

actually if they’re easy then they’re

already done or at least a lot of other

people are already trying to do them so

you’re not going to make much of a

difference by being just another person

who’s also trying to do them then again

there’s the other end of the spectrum

things that would be great but

unfortunately they are completely

impossible like perpetual motion okay

now that’s just you know life we know

that perpetual motion is genuinely

unsolvable but the thing is it’s

actually quite hard to tell whether

something is unsolvable by and large

really hard things are actually solvable

but they’re also the most important

things because they’re not easy so the

first step is to distinguish the two and

that’s not trivial most people get it

wrong most people think that hard things

actually are impossible unsolvable

that’s what we need to fix for now what

is the most important hard but not

impossible problem climate change well

it’s pretty hard

it’s probably solvable in the fullness

of time how about these you know I mean

well peace that’d be quite nice you know

prosperity stuff like that disease that

is everybody wants to be healthy being

sick is seriously no fun hand up anyone

who wants to be sick tomorrow right in

particular there are a particular subset

of diseases called the diseases of old

age diseases that people in the twenties

and thirties and forties basically never

get but pretty much everyone gets them

when they get to be seventy or eighty or

ninety what is special about those

what’s special about that means

everybody gets them because everybody

the other disease is so now the topic of

the talk the real topic why is it that

most infectious diseases

you know tuberculosis the theory or

things like that have been prevented now

you may not know this but 200 years ago

in every country even the wealthiest

countries more than one-third of babies

would die before the age of one more

than one-third was around 40% in any

country that tells you how far we have

come against infectious diseases but

age-related diseases ain’t the same

we’ve made almost no progress what’s

going on what’s so different well is it

like you know is it something that we

can solve or is it unsolvable first

thing I want to look at is the question

of what is aging because people think

well there’s aging and there’s the

diseases of old age and the aging is

this kind of natural thing that’s

universal and fixing it is like

perpetual motion and we might as well

just get over it but actually that may

not be true because there’s ‘yes’ of old

age we don’t think about them that way

we think of them as curable you know

things that we can’t cure yet but we’ll

now when you look at the problem of

aging and the ill health of old age most

people will say well actually the thing

is yeah maybe it’s solvable but it’s

just so intractable there’s so many

things that go wrong and they go wrong

almost at the same time and they

interact with each other and make each

other worse you know it’s just so

complicated that’s what’s been holding

us back don’t worry you’re not supposed

to be able to read this slide it’s just

right but actually that’s not the main

thing that’s holding us back so I’m

going to spend the next minute or two

telling you what is holding us back I’m

going to start by giving a definition of

aging that turns out to be necessary

because if you ask 10 people what that

what aging is then you’ll generally get

about 11 different answers the thing is

that people don’t have a good sense of

what aging really is so I’m going to

give you a definition of aging that is

first of all it’s it’s clear it’s

mechanistic it says what happens and you

know cause and effect but also this

definition demystifies aging it tells me

what aging is in a way that helps you

understand that you already do

understand what aging is aging is not a

phenomenon of biology really at all it’s

a phenomenon of physics which is to say

it’s the same process in the human body

or in any other living organism that it

is in a car or an aeroplane or any other

machine with moving parts whether or not

it’s alive

it’s the accumulation of damage that the

machine does to itself throughout its

operation as a side effect of the normal

operation of the machine damage is

simply the changes in the structure of

the body that are not automatically

reversed by machinery that’s built in

and the body like any simple machine can

tolerate some damage but no me some not

too much if you have too much you go

downhill so it’s like this in a living

organism metabolism is the word that

biologists use to denote the all the

entire network of processes that

that the body does to keep us alive from

one day to the next and damage happened

through our life even starting before

we’re born

and eventually that damage causes

pathology I’ve drawn these little arrows

in a strange way to indicate what we

would like to do we would like to slow

down those arrows but actually at this

point we can’t so here’s the problem I

told you earlier that the popular

conception of the problems of ill health

in old age is essentially this aging and

the diseases so we could say it in the

way that I’m describing on this table

there are in most people’s heads there

are three types of disease there are

infections that’s column one then there

are genetic diseases that’s column two

things that are few people inherit from

their parents and then there are the

chronic progressive diseases of old a

and then way out there in the

stratosphere there’s this completely

different thing that isn’t a disease

that the the somewhat like you know

nebulous things that we call aging

itself sarcopenia that’s the loss of

muscle mass as we get older that kind of

thing that’s what most people think but

this is how you ought to think all the

columns are the same as they were on the

previous slide but as you can see the

big black line is in a different place

the point here is that column three is

misinterpreted and misclassified the

disease is the chronic progressive

diseases of old age are not really

disease at all they are not things that

can be cured they are parts of aging the

only difference between column 3 and

column 4 is terminology we have chosen

to give some of the aspects of aging

disease like names and not other ones

and that’s all now once you get that

right a couple of things come into

perspective you get to understand a lot

of things first thing is you can

understand that the way that we’ve tried

to go about keeping people healthy and

old age is obviously never going to work

it’s called geriatric medicine and

geriatric medicine essentially consists

of attacking the things in column 3

as if they were in column one attacking

the diseases of old age as if they were

infections attacking the pathologies the

symptoms directly it’s never going to

work and in from this simple diagram

it’s obvious why it’s never going to

work because the damage that the body

does to itself in the course of life is

continuing to accumulate and so anything

that attacks the consequences of that

damage is going to become progressively

less effective as the person gets older

now I’m not the only person to point

this out this has been realized by a few

people for more than a century now and

that’s why we have a field called

gerontology

but unfortunately gerontologist don’t

get it right either

what John told us to do is they say well

okay some animals live a lot longer than

other animals they age more slowly

maybe if we study that variability and

we try to understand it really well

we might be able to translate that

understanding into actual treatments

it’s not work it’s actually this is wise

my work metabolism is rather complicated

this diagram is a simplified diagram of

a small so I’m sure I’m sorry it is of a

small subset of what we know about how

the body works and you know it’s rather

mess that handle up anyone who writes

software right if you boil it right so

anyway right software will understand

that this is the ultimate nightmare of

uncommented spaghetti code there is no

way there is no way that we’re ever

going to be able to tweak this thing to

stop it doing the thing we don’t want it

to do the creation of damage without at

the same time having unintended

consequences that stop it from doing

things we need to do and that’s actually

an understatement the real problem is

not that this is a simplified diagram of

a small subset of what we know about how

the body works it the real problem is

that it’s a simplified diagram of a

small subset of what we know about how

our body works which is tiny compared to

the astronomical amount that we don’t

know about how the body works even

ignoring all the stuff that we don’t

even know that we don’t know yeah so

ain’t going to happen all right

but luckily there is a common

alternative a third alternative that was

overlooked for a very long time until I

started to point it out about 50 and 15

years ago

rather than trying to slow down those

two arrows the process were metabolism

creates damage or the process where

damage creates pathology instead we can

separate the arrows from each other we

can go in and periodically repair the

damage so that even though it’s being

created at the natural rate nevertheless

it will not actually accumulate to the

point where it’s bad for you and of

course that’s what we already do coming

back to my point that Aging in the

phenomenon of physics it’s what we

already successfully do with simpler

machines with man-made machines this car

of course is more than 100 years old and

it’s was not designed to be that old it

was probably designed to last no more

than 10 years or 15 but because it had

periodic preventative maintenance

throughout its existence it’s doing just

as well now as when it was built so if

it’s so simple if it’s so obvious then

why the hell don’t have to but come and

give these bloody talks I mean I mean

honestly um the answer really is people

are scared of getting their hopes

up of believing that after the entire

history of civilization having failed to

bring the world’s most important problem

under control that finally we might be

in striking distance of doing it nobody

wants to get their hopes up so they like

to make their peace with aging and put

it out of their minds and get up with

them miserably short lives and and make

the best of it well I say that’s

I say that I say that we ought

to fight to actually save some lives and

that’s why I’m saying we need to wake up

and act decisively it turns out that we

can for the past 15 years I’ve been

working on essentially this dissection

of the problem the types of damage that

accumulating the human body can be

classified into only seven major

categories which I’m listening on the

left here of course I don’t have a

chance to go through them today because

I’ve only got another two minutes and 50

seconds but the what you really need to

know is that for each of those seven

types of damage there is a very

plausible and viable approach to fixing

it you’ve heard of stem cell therapy

that’s the way to fix one of those types

of damage the one at the top loss of

cells which is just cells dying and not

being automatically replaced by cell

division it seems very clear now that

this categorization this classification

really is actually exhaustive there’s

not some category number eight lurking

out there waiting to be discovered

furthermore this is getting traction

among very elite and authoritative

scientists this is here it’s just a

picture of our research advisory board

25 extremely prominent and world leading

specialists in their various areas who

are very much signed up for this damage

repair approach furthermore other people

are beginning at this point to actually

reinvent this idea and pretend it’s

original this paper came out three years

ago annex getting cited roughly once

every two days by other papers so it’s

really saying something that people

believe in and it’s identical to what I

just told you this is they divided Aging

into nine categories rather than seven

but it’s essentially the same idea each

of them they have a particular repair

approach so that’s all nice now the

question then is um what progress are we

making well the good news is quite a lot

of course there is progress worldwide by

various scientists and laboratories

around the world there’s also a charity

a foundation called cents Research

Foundation which we created around this

idea and which I’m the chief science

officer this is a selection of the

papers that we’ve published over the

past few years demonstrating our

progress so it’s happening it’s real

we’re really getting there it’s there’s

a long way to go that I mean if you get

this book which I wrote a few years ago

which actually was translated into

German it’s called niemals alt in german

and you can get it but yes it’s it’s

it’s detailed

there’s a lot of material here because

the fact is aging of the human body is

really really complicated and fixing it

is not going to happen overnight but we

are making more and more progress as

time goes on we’re going to get there

but the question is how soon the

question has it we actually

you have to remember how important this

problem is going back to the word I say

at the beginning of the talk this

problem the problem of aging kills

100,000 people every day that’s roughly

two-thirds of all deaths it’s about 70%

of all deaths worldwide in the

industrialized world it’s about 90% of

all deaths are caused by the ill health

of old age that’s quite bad you know and

we’ve got we’ve had a few we were under

lighted to say that we have had a few

wealthy supporters including a guy named

Michael graver from Berlin who started

web de and Flute de and last minute de

so you’ve probably heard of those

website you’ll hear of Michael graver as

well fairly soon because he’s giving us

quite a bit of money to get this done

but he’s not giving us enough we need

your money too we need every we need

everybody’s money so the fact is you

know think about it how much difference

do you want to make look at that bottom

line you can save a life with $1 if you

think about how quickly we’re going to

solve this I reckon that if we could get

maybe 10 20 30 40 million dollars per

year to do this rather than only four

million which is what we have at the

moment we could probably get this done

about 10 years more quickly and that

come at what if you work it out that

comes to about $1 per life so that’s

worth doing thank you very much [Applause]

Please follow and like us: